During the early years of America, agricultural demands drove most of the economy allowing the South to demanded political protection. One of the protective measures was the Three-Fifths Compromise in 1787. The South wanted to count the slaves toward its population allowing for more representation. At the Constitutional Convention, the delegates decided to count a slave as three-fifths of a person for the purpose of determining the population for how many seats each State would have in the House. This solidified Southern control over Politics for several years to come.
DBQ: Political Disputes 1820-1860 For forty-four years, the United States of America was a thriving country. We had won our independence from Great Britain and we had started to create a country that would change the world. Yet, in the year 1860, a joined country and political agreement between all states seemed utterly impossible. People fought with each other so deeply about slavery, the country was divided between slave and free states. By the time of 1820 through 1860, political disagreement grew so large, there had been only one answer.
The Compromise of 1850 was an attempt by the U.S Congress to settle divisive issues between the North and South, including slavery expansion, apprehension in the North of fugitive slaves, and slavery in the District of Columbia. The Compromise of 1850 failed because Senator John C. Calhoun from the South and Senator William Seward from the North could not agree on what Henry Clay was putting down. Part of the compromise was to make California a slavery free state which benefits the North, and enforcing a stricter fugitive slave law which benefits the South. Both the North and South opposed what the other was benefiting from. What sparked the failure of the Compromise was the Fugitive Slave Law of 1850.
During the Compromise of 1850, there was a law called the Fugitive Slave Act. Many black families have been captured and sold into slavery. It was the federal law that allowed to captured and return runaway slaves back to their owners. Many Northerners wanted to help the slaves to escape instead of help capturing them. Harriet Beecher Stowe had written a novel as a cry against the Fugitive Slave Act of 1850.
Secondly, the Nullification Crisis and Force Act, this really created more hate between the North and the South. In the Nullification Crisis Jackson created and law and it was passed but the state of South Carolina did not want to follow it. Andrew Jackson threatened South Carolina that he would kill if they didn’t follow the law. It was and is still against the constitution for any state to not follow a federal law.
Slavery was one of the biggest problems between 1820 and 1860. Sometimes two states had to be added to the Union at the same time, to make things fair. The North and the South fought almost constantly over the issue of slavery, sometimes things were able to be worked out about it, but as the years passed, the problems with slavery and territory started to become too big to ignore or
It is undeniable that the passing of The Fugitive Slave Act changed the lifestyles of many such as slaves, fugitive or not, Free African-Americans, and the abolitionists, further displaying itself as the trigger point of the Civil War. The implementation of the Fugitive Slave Act caused a major change in life for free African-Americans. This act addressed the fugitive slaves who were running away to the Northern states. It was originally signed by Washington in 1793 but was later made into a federal law by Henry Clay.
The North and South were polar opposites. This lead to many disagreements between the states due to conflicts of interest. In order to improve relationships, the convention had made the states compromise so that everyone would be pleased. One of the compromises made addressed North and South conflicts regarding slaves.
The Fugitive Slave Act was part of the group of laws referred to as the "Compromise of 1850. " In this compromise, the anti slavery people gained the admission of California as a free state and the prohibition of slave-trading in the District of Columbia. This law allowed slave hunters to gather any runaway slaves who escaped from one state into another or into a federal territory. It also allowed them to seize alleged fugitive slaves without due process of law and it it was often presumed that a black person was a slave, so the law threatened the safety of all blacks even the free ones. Passage of this law was so hated by abolitionists, however, that its existence played a role in the end of slavery a little more than a dozen years later.
Slavery had led to a division in the United States. Northerners expressed the abolishment of slavery while the Southerners were in favor of it. During the 1850’s, the United States became polarized due to slavery sentiments on both sides and Congress passed Fugitive Slave Laws. Congress passed the fugitive slave laws in 1793 and 1850 to return slaves who had escaped from a slave state into a free state or territory. The ideology of the fugitive slave law was borrowed from the Fugitive Slave Clause in the United States Constitution (Article IV, Section 2, Paragraph 3).
The Compromise of 1850 was not the only compromise that caused disputes between the North and South. The Compromise of 1850 turned all Northerners into slave catchers and enforced the fugitive slave law. This angered the Northerners because they could get fined or imprisoned for not following it. So Northerners simply didn't follow it because they thought it was unjust, which made the Southerners mad. Some people may believe that if both sides never made certain compromises that the Civil War would not have happened, but without compromises the Civil War may have even occurred earlier because the the North and South could not agree on much at the time.
While some sought to end slavery other tried to save the owner 's right to slaves. In 1793 and 1850 the fugitive slave act was instated. It helped give owners the return of runaway slave. The owners would stop at nothing to have their slave back. Sometimes owners would even have a bounty on them.
Second Great Awakening: The Second Great Awakening was an Evangelical Protestant revivals that swept over America in the early 19th century. The movement began around 1790 and gained momentum by 1800 and after 1820 membership rose rapidly among the Baptist and Methodist congregation whose preacher led the movement Fugitive Slave Law 1850: The Fugitive Slave Law was passed in 1850. this federal law made it easier for slave owners to recapture runaway slaves; it also made it easier for kidnapper to take free blacks.
Since the law basically approved the hunting of fugitive slaves, Northerners took offense to this and intentionally refused to enforce the law and then set up resistance groups and built safe houses to aid the slaves in their escape to the North. They even went a step further by passing what they called “Personal Liberty Laws”, which protected free blacks and gave the accused fugitives the right to a jury trial. The North’s blatant disregard of the law basically nullified the law which greatly angered Southerns. This soon resulted in the second fugitive slave law being passed in 1850, which gave stricter guidelines and harsher punishment, which caused even more controversy and intensified the tensions of the states to the point of secession and
The Fugitive Slave Acts were an act of rebellion against slaves escaping. There was already the fugitive slave act that was created in 1793 to allow slave masters to force slaves back into captivity, but it was not enforced that much. By 1850, there were many slaves that escaped and the since there could not be any more slaves imported, the price of a slave rose exponentially. The new acts in 1850 forced any citizen who saw a runaway slave to catch them, and “It also denied slaves the right to a jury trial and increased the penalty for interfering with the rendition process to $1000 and six months in jail” (History.com). This was a method rebellion against slaves for escaping, but the act fell through quickly because by then, almost no one
