ipl-logo

Tort Reform Essay

454 Words2 Pages

In today’s economy, there lies an ambivalent nature towards government interaction with business behavior. The diametrically opposing ideas battle for supremacy in order to distinguish whether to keep the current tort reform policies or abrogate the notion and let the market stabilize the inconsistencies.
The primary and most salient argument for reform is that tort laws undermine the essence of businesses. Advocates for business and professionals have insisted that it is a drag on innovation, quality, and competitiveness. Quite possibly the most profound rhetoric lamented by reformers is that expansive product liability stifles economic activity by imposing excessive and unpredictable liability cost on businesses. Furthermore, cost inequalities are another aspect which ignites vehement discussion amongst business owners. According to the Small Business Administration (SBA), small businesses are hit harder; firms with fewer than 20 …show more content…

Specifically, these policies explicitly establish an amalgam of benefits for the customer. First, the threat of liability might incentivize manufactures to sell safer products and second, the imposition of liability could help ensure that products’ prices reflect their true social cost. Through the apparatus of government, certain victims can beseech laws to substantiate their claims in order to formulate an outcome that is more congenial to their needs. In both principle and practice, tort law’s particular form of accountability has an egalitarian aspect that renders it distinctive and valuable, and the law of products liability is in this particular way equality reinforcing. Despite the injurious slander being tossed around about several cases, the seemingly endless juxtaposition of tort reform has prompted several axiomatic arguments which express several caveats to our

Show More
Related
838 Words | 4 Pages

“The defendant is liable only if the product is defective when it leaves his hands. There must be something wrong with the goods. If they are reasonably safe and the buyer’s mishandling of the goods causes the harm, there is no

Read More
1403 Words | 6 Pages

This essay will be organized by answering the questions in chronological order; to which in the first question, I will be looking heavily into the case of R.v. Saulte Ste. Marie and Roach. It will incorporate the regulatory offences and the mental blameworthiness and how strict liability acts as a balance between the two. It will also include the defence of due diligence.

Read More
556 Words | 3 Pages

Julian wants to sue David, the other player. In his complaint, which tort theory is Julian’s attorney most likely to allege and what will he have to prove for Julian to be successful? 
Julian’s attorney is most likely to allege Intentional Tort for his complaint to be successful. An intentional tort occurs whenever someone intends an action that results in harm to a person’s body, reputation, emotional well-being, or property. During the game David kicked Julian in the head while Julian was in possession on the ball.

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

The second chapter of “Pop Torts”, William Haltom and Michael McCann explains the issue of greed playing a role in the courtroom, along with the occurrences leading up to the problem. The chapter goes in depth with the issue legal degeneration and moral regeneration of “Pop Torts” as a man was using an electric power mower for the wrong reason, in which he ends up cutting off his own fingers without even turning off the power in the first place. The man fought back and won the case, while playing the victim for his very own actions. Haltom and McCann continue with chapter three of “In Retort: Narratives versus Numbers” as the issue of filing a lawsuit is quite easy, as individuals fight for an issue that was technically their fault. Issues

Read More
1347 Words | 6 Pages

As long as torts are committed in the line of duty then the employer is liable to some extend on the employees actions. Betty Duke’s malicious and criminal torts are within the category of respondent superior in law despite the fact that Wal-Mart could not have authorized the commission of the said acts (Toobin, 2011). This doctrine therefore makes Wal-Mart totally accountable for their employee’s acts. Wal-Mart is thus liable for any acts committed by the Betty Dukes and in a small way had control over her. This was somewhat associated with the Wal-Mart’s risk of conducting

Read More
661 Words | 3 Pages

After serving 24 years in prison for a crime that he did not commit, Andre Hatchett was finally released. This is important to know because so many people have been accused and or convicted of crimes that they did not have any part of. Andre Hatchett was wrongfully convicted of murder because of witnesses and problems with the trial but, was later proven innocent. Many different reasons led to the conviction of Andre Hatchett.

Read More
189 Words | 1 Pages

As a consequence, of the legal case between Mrs. Liebeck (plaintiff) and McDonald’s (defendant) many companies and citizens started a campaign against this kind of lawsuits. In fact, they considered the Hot Coffee lawsuit a frivolous one that took economical advantage of the legal system to make some “easy money.” So, the media turned it up side down the “Hot Coffee” legal case and Mrs. Liebeck and the entire situation became a joke. As a consequence, this case became the example and the propaganda of why the Tort reform was “necessary” or that was what the media and the government made us believe. So, a Tort Reform limits the general public’s rights to go to court.

Read More
703 Words | 3 Pages

Although it is designed to assist employees who have sustained a workplace injury, the author continuously illustrates how injured workers are worse off after coming through the machine of workers’ compensation. Barnetson concludes that the “moral commitment to worker welfare is clearly absent,” as employers design jobs to maximize profit regardless of the harm to workers. Weak legal regulations also indicate “intentionally prioritizing profitability over safety.” The author

Read More
917 Words | 4 Pages

It was stated by Charles Evans Hughes in a court case (Document F) that “[the] authority of the federal government may not be pushed to such as extreme.” This court case was in context of the government’s control over the poultry industry and he believed that the expansion in power, and specifically on businesses, was too much. Yet another example of businesses being put down is given by John L. Lewis in a NBC radio broadcast (Document G) where he talked about how business leaders “have no right” to not listen to union employees and cooperate with them. While corporate-union relationships ought to exist and facilitate workers with fair pay and conditions, it is also important especially during this time of hardship for businesses to be able to thrive so that the economy can be revived. Along with the control that they have, the government isn’t helping businesses either by giving them the backhand for not complying with the demands of unions; they are hindering businesses from growing.

Read More
908 Words | 4 Pages

Many small business owners couldn’t compete with bigger owners, due to the fact that big business owners had such a grasp on their markets. In primary source H, a small oil business owner explain why he could never compete with bigger owners, forcing him to raise his prices for customers to keep his business alive. But, even though his oil was better, his competitors was cheaper, he soon learned that big businesses had deal with the railroad, to supply the oil cheaper. In document J, the pictures shows women working hard in a labor mill, typing up documents all day with little pay. Hard working Americans received little pay of benefits, compared to their bosses who took all the money for themselves.

Read More
1504 Words | 7 Pages

Neff Said: Mise-en-scene and Sound in Double Indemnity Film Noir is a genre filled with many interesting conventions. The films within Film Noir use narration, performance, lighting, and blocking in order to tell tales of murder, betrayal, and questionable morals.

Read More
1826 Words | 8 Pages

Introduction: The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) was signed into law by President Obama in 2010 in response to the financial crisis of 2008. The act aimed to regulate the financial industry and prevent a future economic collapse. It proposed the creation of new regulatory agencies, increased transparency and accountability for financial institutions, and consumer protection. However, since its passage, Dodd-Frank has been controversial, with critics arguing that it is too complex and burdensome for the financial industry.

Read More
1617 Words | 7 Pages

As Americans we are not subject to dictatorship; someone having complete authority over our lives. In fact, The United States of America gets praised for not being a communist country. The government does not control every aspect of society but Tort Reform challenges the idea of Americans free will and put a cap on the compensation that is legally and morally right for the sake of big business corporations. Tort Reform is the complete opposite of a taboo topic. Tort reform is such a controversial topic that is still talked about in the newspaper and other social media outlets even today.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

Another reform that must be made is raising the limit of full time employee equivalents that defines a business as small. A significant amount of small business have been choked out by being forced to pay high premiums for their employees. If this limit is raised by even 50, a large amount of businesses will have room to grow until they can actually afford it. It is also important that SHOP is not only raised to whatever a small business will be designated as, but also the amount of benefits should be increased too.

Read More
700 Words | 3 Pages

Being formed in 1948, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights helps recognize “the inherent dignity” and the “equal and unalienable rights of all members of the human family”. Based on this very concept of the person, and the fundamental dignity and equality of all human beings, that the notion of patient rights was developed. Patient rights involve those basic rules of conduct between patients and medical caregivers as well as the institutions and people that support them. A patient is anyone who has requested to be evaluated by or who is being evaluated by any healthcare professional.

Read More

More about Tort Reform Essay

Related Topics

Open Document