ipl-logo

What Is Toulmin's Model Of An Argument

1007 Words5 Pages

Toulmin’s model of argumentation breaks down an argument into six parts, the claim, data, warrant, backing, qualifier and rebuttal. The claim is the thesis of an argument and the data is what evidence is used to support the claim. The warrant is usually not as clear, it is the information that connects the data to the claim. Backing is similar to the data, but it is what influences the speaker to argue their specific claim and the qualifier reveals how strongly the speaker feels about the topic. Finally, the rebuttal is where a potential opposing view is included in the argument and denounced to help strengthen the claim. Toulmin’s model also describes the force of an argument which refers to the way certain phrases are put together to impact …show more content…

First, the repetitiveness of the claim that is found in both the first and last paragraph creates force in Iveson’s argument by using the same words in a childlike and an adulthood voting context, because everyone has special connections to their childhood fantasies. The other place force was used, was at the end of the second paragraph, “as if clarity comes from volume alone.” This phrase has force because it has a sarcastic tone and it makes the reader think about this circumstance where there is truly no correlation between volume and clarity. This relates to her argument by demonstrating the ineffectiveness of trying to change someone’s beliefs and instead we should recognize the value of all different opinions. Each element of Toulmin’s model of argumentation is present in Cande Iveson’s “The Value of the Middle.” Because of this, her argument is concise and effective in just one page of writing. Toulmin’s model can be used to analyze any effective argument and his concepts can even help when creating one. I think that Iveson’s claim that “…the middle can, once again, seem extraordinary, magical and fabulous – the best place to be” is morally sound because this argument seeks to better society by opening our eyes to understanding points of view different from our

Show More
Related
963 Words | 4 Pages

She addresses the other side of the argument which is a really good push forward for her ethos because it shows that she sees the other side, but she is still able to argue against it. Another big appeal to her ethos is a simple two words. She pulls more factual evidence but this time presents it as “Dr. Michael Bell…told me…” (192). In saying that he himself told her shows that she did her research and this is a big appeal to her ethos because it makes the reader create the undeniable trust in her because you know she put in her efforts to make sure she was completely informed about the

Read More
115 Words | 1 Pages

Greg Olsen is entering his fifth season with the Carolina Panthers and become the most underrated tight end in the league in my opinion. He has no doubt become old reliable for quarterback Cam Newton to play breaks down or he just needs to find his rhythm. Olsen is coming off his best year as a pro with 84 receptions for 1,008 yards and six touchdowns that productivity resulted in his first Pro bowl selection. 2015 I predict much of the same especially with the loss of Kelvin Benjamin and the sudden inexperience at the wide receiver position. Thank you Chicago Bears for giving us one of the best tight ends in football much

Read More
328 Words | 2 Pages

To start off, Mr. Herbert challenges the rights of the slogan that both the Coca-Cola company and Mr. Seaver’s Grove Press company have been using. Herbert attempts to emphasize the size of the problem, claiming that “Several people have called to our attention…” the trouble of both companies using the slogan (line 1). Herbert underscoring the problem creates the effect that it is a noticeable problem that needs a solution as soon as possible. In addition to that Herbert uses a professional tone, introducing his claim in a formal manner, and not plainly demanding for Grove Press to stop using the slogan. Establishing a professional tone can help in an argument as that makes the writer seem like credible, which connects back to ethos.

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

The Toulmin method is an effective tool that helps determine the efficacy of an argument by using this method the author’s argumentative strategies are evaluated to determine their strength. This essay will use the Toulmin method in order to assess the strength of James E. McWilliams’ argument. The Toulmin method will break down the author’s argument into components—the claim, evidence, warrant, qualifiers, and rebuttal. Through using the Toulmin method, Williams’ argument and the components of his argument will be dissected and individually analyzed to determine each component’s effectiveness and how it contributes to the overall power and credibility of Williams’ argument.

Read More
1123 Words | 5 Pages

The rhetorical situation consists of four aspects of the speech. The first aspect is to

Read More
627 Words | 3 Pages

Arguments happen everyday in history and now a days. Weather the arguments come from speeches, debates, body language, or even a paper; they contribute to everyday life. These arguments can happen by audio or visual rhetorics which help to strengthen the argument and its purpose. Both Daniel H. Cohen and FDR use great rhetorics in their speeches, ethos and pathos, while keeping in mind the audiences they are speaking to. These two men both had a purpose in their speeches, weather it to argue the importance and ways of argument winning, or the future of the country.

Read More
788 Words | 4 Pages

Chris McCandless was in his early 20’s, he was the kind of that guy that wanted to learn and experience life without all of the material things. He wanted to be independent from his parents and friends so Chris did something that would be insane for most of us humans but to him, it wasn’t. He went into the wild of Alaska for months, in fact, McCandless even thought he could make it out alive at the end of his journey. As a matter of fact, he was known as being a risk taker and enjoyed being out and about in the nature side of the world. Many would believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild to purposely kill himself; however, I myself believe that McCandless did not do it purposely.

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

In the argument between Mr.Gilmer and Atticus In to kill a mockingbird about Tom Robinson being found guilty for raping Mayella. There was impressive work of rhetorical analysis (Logos, Pathos, and Ethos). This argument takes place in a courthouse in Maycomb which if packed with the people of Maycomb. The argument between Atticus and Mr.Gilmer was about Tom Robinson to find out if he truly raped and abused Mayella. In the argument between them both used Logos, Ethos, and Pathos.

Read More
748 Words | 3 Pages

The relationships between the elements of the rhetorical triangle are crucial to forming an effective argument. If the rhetor understands these relationships and masterfully ties their text to other texts, their audience makes connections between them. The elements of one text can fuel the argument of the other. The rhetor is more likely to persuade their audience if they implement this strategy, and the more connections the audience makes between texts, the more successful the argument will be. This can be demonstrated using the order of an episode of a TV show and a commercial: the audience links the purpose of the episode to the commercial, which in turn develops its argument.

Read More
1883 Words | 8 Pages

Argumentative Essay Bartleby the Scrivener is a story narrated from the perception of a Manhattan lawyer responsible for managing an interesting office. The center of this narrative is Bartleby, and it concentrates on the affiliation between him and the narrator who hires him to work in his office. There is not much clarity as to how the narrator finds Bartleby, but this is not an issue of concern until matters take a different direction. Bartleby is revealed as a good worker in comparison to other employees in the office that tend to show their faults like partly being excellent employees.

Read More
1354 Words | 6 Pages

It took just forty five days for United States citizens to acquiesce their rights to freedom and privacy for the sake of safety following the events of September 11, 2001. Forty five days is how long it took the United States Congress to pass a law that gave up the very concept of liberty upon which this country is founded. The morning sky was a brilliant shade of blue with not a cloud in sight in New York on that fateful day of September. That all changed at 8:45 AM when a Boeing 767 jet plane tore into the north tower of the World Trade Center. Eighteen minutes later, a second Boeing 767 bit into the sixtieth floor of the south tower.

Read More
173 Words | 1 Pages

Through the analysis of the numerous arguments throughout the course, I was made aware of the detrimental effects logical fallacies have on an argument if left undetected or detected. Although the use of appeals was a review from high school, I initially had trouble distinguishing the appeals from each other.

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

Lavi is a Bookman in training and an exorcist, meaning he possesses several powers and abilities. eidetic memory | Both naturally intelligent and highly trained, Lavi has a photographic memory. He identifies one real key from hundreds of counterfeits in minutes only using his one eye and provides comprehensive details of past occurrences. education | As a Bookman 's apprentice, Lavi has a vast arrange of general knowledge. medicine | He has been formally taught and practiced first aid as well as specific medicinal remedies.

Read More
667 Words | 3 Pages

Every day humans encounter rhetorical situations, yet hardly ever is a heated conversation or debate though of this way. Rhetoric, which is the art of conversation has been used for thousands of years across the world. Rhetorical situations constitute of four elements, the exigence, rhetor, audience, and constraints. All of these are equally the most important elements, because without each other the conversation would make no sense. The action or statement that sparks a discourse, or the exigence is one of the four constituents of a rhetorical analysis.

Read More
1257 Words | 6 Pages

A good reasoning is a reasoning that leads to certain, true and valid conclusions. There are two kinds of reasoning, inductive and deductive reasoning. Both processes include the process of finding a conclusion from multiple premises although the way of approach may differ. Deductive reasoning uses general premises to make a specific conclusion; inductive reasoning uses specific premises to make a generalized conclusion. The two types of reasoning can be influenced by emotion in a different manner because of their different process to yield a conclusion.

Read More

More about What Is Toulmin's Model Of An Argument

Related Topics

Open Document