ipl-logo

Trinity Lutheran Church V. Comer Case Study

1843 Words8 Pages

Case Information: Trinity Lutheran Church v. Comer will be argued in the Supreme Court on April, 19, 2017. The case deals with the First Amendment, freedom of religion, the 14thAmendment, Equal Protection Clause, and the Establishment Clause. Background: Trinity Lutheran Church is a church that has operated for 90 years in Columbia, Missouri. The church provides several services that include: foster care, volunteering, providing food for the less fortunate, helping fund local food bank, helping with building projects in its community, as well as running a community daycare center and preschool for children in the community, called the Learning Center. The Learning Center operates using an open admission policy and …show more content…

Board of Education a New Jersey law gave finical compensations to families whose children who were driven on buses operated by the public transportation system. This was also given to families who kids attended Catholic schools. The Court found that this law did not violate the Establishment Clause because public services and protection for religious schools are separate from their religious function and does not violate the First Amendment. The law did not financially support religious programs directly. It was enacted as a "general program" to aid parents in their children’s transportation regardless of their denomination. Everson v. Board of Education is a prime example of the distinction between religious advancement and religious discrimination. The Court made a clear statement regarding religious groups receiving government funding, if the purpose of the funds is to aid a secular purpose, or involves a general program to promote the public welfare, then it is …show more content…

The funding that occurred in Lemon and Locke went directly to religious purposes, so the State was right to not fund them. In the Trinity case, the funds are at least partially for secular use since the playground is open to the public after hours and admission to the school is open to anyone from the community. Despite that, Missouri argues that it is not discriminating by barring all religious groups from receiving any public funds even if they are used for partially secular purposes. In Luetkemeyer v. Kaufmann, 364 F.Supp. 376, 383–84 (W.D.Mo.1973), aff 'd,419 U.S. 888, 95 S.Ct. 167, 42 L.Ed.2d 134 (1974). which evaluated a similar Missouri provision in determining if the State could refuse to provide bussing services for parochial schools, the Court held that maintaining a wall between Church and State is a legitimate State interest sufficient to overcome an equal protection and free of religion argument. The State’s provision is constitutional under the Freedom of Religion Clause of the 1st Amendment because it does not discriminate between religious groups, since no group is eligible. The State is allowed to deny religious organizations funding from secular programs and benefits that are not widely and generally available to the public at large. The State only awarded 14 grants to carefully selected organizations, and the State had a rational basis for using religious

Show More
Related
178 Words | 1 Pages

The supreme court case of Trinity Lutheran Church vs. Comer, is a case in which the supreme court of the United States of America held a Missouri Program that denied funding to religious groups that would be used for profane purposes, that is provided to non-religious groups violated the First Amendment’s guarantee of freedom of religion. “The Trinity Lutheran Church Child Learning Center is a Missouri preschool and daycare center. Originally established as a nonprofit organization, the Center later merged with Trinity Lutheran Church and now operates under its auspices on church property.” The Trinity Lutheran v. Comer case finds that governments can not discriminate against churches that would otherwise qualify for funding just because

Read More
312 Words | 2 Pages

(2) Background Information As well as the lawsuit filed by Alton Lemon, this incident involved two other cases that fell under the same issue, Earley v. DiCenso and Robinson v. DisCenso. Both conflicts involved a state law passed, through the Non- public Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1968, by the state of Pennsylvania and Rhode Island. This act gave the government permission to fund religious based or parochial schools. Although the schools provided textbooks and instructional materials for secular subjects, a Pennsylvania instructor believed that this act violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion” Lemon argued that that by providing this money

Read More
672 Words | 3 Pages

TWU presented its proposal to the Federation Approval Committee for a law school to open, in which TWU was granted preliminary approval by the federation. Following the preliminary approval, TWU requested for the LSUC to accredit its law school, and when deciding whether to accredit a law school, the LSUC is not restricted simply to considering standards of competence; a broader spectrum of considerations with respect to the public interest is engaged; The LSUC deciding not to accredit TWU’s proposed law school because of the discriminatory code of conduct would infringe TWU’s freedom of religion under s. 2(a) of the Charter; however In assessing the “public interest”, the LSUC is entitled to consider that the impact of TWU’s Community Covenant on members of the LGBTQ community is contrary to the equality rights protections in the Charter, therefore upon further consideration balancing TWU’s freedom of religion granted under section 2 of the charter, on one hand with the equality rights of the LGBTQ community granted under section 15 of the charter. Ultimately with a vote of 28 to 21 with one abstention The Law Society of Upper Canada decided not to accredit TWU due to the fact that it was found not to be in the public interest to provide accreditation to a law school with discriminatory admissions

Read More
1025 Words | 5 Pages

The Divisional Court upheld LSUC’s decision to not accredit TWU’s law school. The reasons for the following decision are albeit TWU’s freedom of religion rights are infringed upon, the LSUC has a duty to consider the public impact of accrediting a law school, and accrediting a law school that inherently has discriminatory policies was not in the interest of the public. The LSUC proportionately balanced TWU’s freedom of religion and the right to equality, and it was concluded that it was a reasonable limit to breach religious right’s, as it was of more importance to advocate for the right to equal treatment and access to

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

Abington SD vs. Schempp This case concerns Bible reading in the public schools of Pennsylvania. When the students who attended arrived for school, they were required to read at least ten verses from the Bible. After that, they were required to recite the Lord’s Prayer. The only way to avoid these activities was written note from the parents. The United States Supreme Court favored Schempp and declared this Bible reading to be unconstitutional.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

This shows that after this case study, it was established that US Citizens have the right to a K-12 education, one that is equally funded so that all students are learning on a level playing field. For this case study, the Texas Supreme Court established the right for students to receive a public school education Texas citizens have the responsibility to take action against an issue they find unconstitutional, either by voting or joining an interest group.

Read More
2001 Words | 9 Pages

Vitale. The case of Engel v. Vitale was brought up by a group of families from New Hyde park, New York, they were up against the voluntary prayer written by the state board to God, in other words, the study board wrote a Christian prayer up for public students who wants it. A group of parent under their leader Steven Engel(a jihadist) were not Christians and they believed this prayer contradicted their religion, they argued opening a public school with such prayer violates the clause of the first Amendment and the fourteenth amendment. At the end of this case, the court ruled government- written prayers may not be recited in public schools because it violates the first amendment. However these public school students were given a choice they were not forced to pray this prayer, moreover, this particular prayer was not sponsored by taxpayer’s money.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

The issue in this case was whether school-sponsored nondenominational prayer in public schools violates the Establishment clause of the first amendment (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This case dealt with a New York state law that had required public schools to open each day with the Pledge of Allegiance and a nondenominational prayer in which the students recognized their dependence upon God (Facts and Case Summary - Engel v. Vitale, n.d.). This law had also allowed students to absent themselves from this activity if they found that it was objectionable. There was a parent that sued the school on behalf of their child. Their argument was that the law violated the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment, as made applicable

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

In 1962, the Supreme Court case “Engle v. Vitale” ruled that school prayer could no longer be performed in public classrooms because it was offensive to some families’ religious beliefs. The arguments revolved around the different interpretations and understandings of the 1st Amendment that stated, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof;” Those opposed to school prayer claimed that it violated their personal/religious beliefs; because their children were forced to pray to a God they did not believe existed. They thought that religious activities should be separate from government policies and remain a “function to the people themselves.” On the other hand, those supporting

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

“The students alleged that Westside 's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requires that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages” (Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens by and Through Mergens). Many still argue today that Westside 's prohibition against the Christian club, consistent with the Establishment Clause, makes the Equal Access Act unconstitutional.

Read More
306 Words | 2 Pages

The first major case brought to notice was West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette. Before this court decision, it was common for children to be expelled from school for not comply with the pledge. The Board of education wanted the pledge to become a regular part of public schooling and refusing to obey was an Act of insubordination which ended in expulsion. If the child still did not conform, they would be considered unlawfully

Read More
650 Words | 3 Pages

On June 25, 1962, a Supreme Court case, Engel v. Vitale, 370 U.S. 421, was decided. The lawsuit was brought to the United States Supreme Court by parents (of students who attended schools in the Herricks School District) who complained that a nondenominational prayer instituted by the New York Board of Regents in their district was unconstitutional. The parents argued that the prayer, although optional, violated their First Amendment Rights. When the 6-1 (two justices did not vote) decision was made, it was ruled that voluntary prayer in public schools violates the Establishment Clause in the First Amendment of the United States Constitution. One concurring opinion was given, and the single judge that did not vote the same as the rest provided

Read More
1972 Words | 8 Pages

Board of Education is a very important landmark case. This case addressed the constitutionality of segregation in public schools back in the early 1950s. When the case was heard in a U.S. District Court a three-judge panel ruled in favor of the school boards. The plaintiffs then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. The Supreme Court went through all its procedures and eventually decided that “Separate educational facilities are inherently unequal” ().

Read More
1003 Words | 5 Pages

Before this case, schools were segregated, but deemed “separate, but equal”. This

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Decades ago, children of various races could not go to school together in many locations of the United States. School districts could segregate students, legally, into different schools according to the color of their skin. The law said these separate schools had to be equal. Many schools for children that possessed color were of lesser quality than the schools for white students. To have separate schools for the black and white children became a basic rule in southern society.

Read More

More about Trinity Lutheran Church V. Comer Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document