Two Key Assumptions Of The Field Of Anthropology

1132 Words5 Pages

1.What seems to be some of the assumptions of the field of anthropology (based on evidence from you book)
This linguistic turn makes problematic two key assumptions of qualitative research. The first is that qualitative researchers can directly capture lived experience. Such experience, it is now argued, is created in the social text written by the researcher. This is the representational crisis…. The second assumption makes the traditional criteria for evaluating and interpreting qualitative research problematic. This is the legitimation crisis. It involves a serious rethinking of such terms as validity, generalizability, and reliability. … This crisis asks, how are qualitative studies to be evaluated in the poststructural moment?
2.What Material is studied (based on book evidence)
Focusing on a particular area of the U.S.-Mexico border, Ciudad Juarez-El Paso, Ethnography at the Border brings out the complexity of the border experience through the voices of the diverse people who inhabit the region. In a series of ethnographic essays that investigate specific aspects of border existence, the contributors provide rich and detailed insights into such topics …show more content…

4 were sociology students (Leslie Salzinger, Tim Dunn, David Spener, and I), 1 a communications graduate (Eduardo Barrera), 1 a human geography graduate student (Melissa Wright), and the final 1 a literature student (Socorro Tabuenca). It is important to remember this diversity and above all the prominence of sociologists among the “non anthropologists” in the group, because much of the debate about “natives” and “non natives,” the West and the rest, was much more important for those contributors who were part of anthropology departments than for the rest of us. →