ipl-logo

Tybalt Is To Blame In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

702 Words3 Pages

Every Action Has a Reaction People often do senseless actions that they don’t realize the consequences to, until it is too late. Tybalt is guilty of this. In the tragedy, Romeo and Juliet, William Shakespeare depicts a tragic and heart-wrenching story about two star-crossed lovers. These two lovers, Romeo and Juliet, die a horrendous death where they both commit suicide. Many characters in this drama could be to blame for their death, but logically the best character to blame is Tybalt. The reason Tybalt is to blame is because he started a chain reaction that lead to the deaths of many characters, including Romeo and Juliet. This chain reaction includes three main events. The first event is Tybalt having a hot-head and over reacting at a party. …show more content…

From the beginning of the play it is evident that Tybalt is a strong willed and anxious character. This does not play a key role in the play until the party at Capulet’s house. Tybalt notices Romeo and his friends at the party and becomes extremely angered because they are Montagues at a Capulet party. Instantly Tybalt says to his Page, “Fetch me my rapier, boy” (1.5.54). Tybalt has such an infuriating personality that he intends to kill poor Romeo, who is just trying to have a good time. Capulet luckily calms him down and stops Tybalt from acting out. What one doesn’t know, is that Tybalt will remember this intrusion for the rest of the play. This all starts a chain …show more content…

Tybalt always kept Romeo’s intrusion in the back of his mind, until one day when he decided to act upon it. “Turn and draw” (3.1.38), he tells Romeo. Romeo being a wise young man doesn’t fight him. Tybalt has to take his rage out on someone, so he decides to fight and kill Mercutio. Romeo then kills Tybalt and gets banished. If Tybalt wouldn’t have started this fight, then Romeo and Juliet wouldn’t have died. Romeo and Juliet wouldn’t have died because if Romeo wouldn’t have had to end the fight, then he wouldn’t have gotten banished. If he wouldn’t have gotten banished, then friar wouldn’t have had to make a faulty plan, which made Romeo and Juliet commit

Show More
Related
440 Words | 2 Pages

Tybalt’s violence starts at a Capulet ball, continues when he kills someone and ends with him being responsible for the death of many people and the rest of the tragedies. Tybalt recognizes Romeo Montague’s voice when he showed up uninvited to a Capulet masquerade ball. Tybalt was furious and wanted to kill Romeo but Tybalt’s uncle stopped him. At the ball, Romeo saw Juliet Capulet for the first time and they fell madly in love instantly before they even knew each other’s names or that they were from the different families. Tybalt still felt disrespected that Romeo and his friend had come to the ball and wasn’t going to let it go.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

Tybalt instigates Romeo when he said, “Romeo, the love I bear thee can afford no better term than this: thou art a villain” (3.1.31-32). Tybalt is insulting Romeo by calling him a villain, thus adding more tension to the situation. By doing so, this made Romeo more willing to fight. Romeo tried to avoid the fight more than once. Tybalt was determined to fight someone, which is supported by the fact that he went through with fighting Mercutio even after Romeo rejected the initial altercation.

Read More
755 Words | 4 Pages

Tybalt has been reckless through this whole event and due to this, it gets him killed in the end, but if he didn’t gotten himself involved at all maybe had more control over his horrible anger issues Romeo wouldn’t have been banished from Verona in the first place. Tybalt’s involvement made multiple paths to disaster and Friar Lawrence’s plan wouldn’t have been ruined in the first place. Even at the party, he tried to start something. Romeo even tried to be civil with his new cousin-in-law but Tybalt was to blind to see

Read More
432 Words | 2 Pages

But even if Tybalt had not of gotten Romeo banished, the relationship between Romeo and Juliet would have been revealed. Friar Lawrence would try to help Romeo and cause somebody else to find out. So Tybalt did have an effect on the ending, but not as large as Friar

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Later in the play Tybalt's recklessness reaches its peak when he challenges Romeo to a fight on the streets of Verona. Romeo, who has just married Juliet, is refusing to fight and tries to de-escalate the situation by saying, "I do protest I never injured thee, But love thee better than thou canst devise, Till thou shalt know the reason of my love" (Rom 3.1.64-66). Tybalt hates Romeo with his whole heart and does not care about the consequences that will happen by doing so. After Romeo marries Juliet, fighting her kinsman Tybalt is the last thing that he wants to do. Further in the book, Tybalt is not interested in hearing

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

Firstly, Tybalt is a hot-headed character who is quick to react with violence. In the play, he is the one who starts the fight with Romeo and his friends, which ultimately leads to the banishment of Romeo. If Tybalt had not started the fight, Romeo would not have been banished, and he would not have felt the need to take drastic measures to be with Juliet. Secondly, Tybalt's actions lead to a chain of events that ultimately result in the deaths of both Romeo and Juliet.

Read More
802 Words | 4 Pages

Tybalt is antagonist person in this book because he had to be selfish, hard headed and try to take Romeo's life. Romeo went to Capulet’s party and Tybalt recognize him and he’s going to expel Romeo to the party. He said to Lord Capulet, “Uncle, this is a Montague, our foe; A villain, that is hither come in spite to scorn at our solemnity this night” (1.5.60-61). “It fits when such a villain is a guest. I’ll not endure him” (1.5.74).

Read More
1009 Words | 5 Pages

In either situation, he would have been killed. Romeo killed Tybalt but only got the punishment of banishment because “His fault concludes but what the law should end, the life of Tybalt” (3.1.184-185). Lord Montague is saying that Romeo’s punishment is fair because he killed Tybalt for revenge and it’s what the law would’ve done anyway. So Tybalt would be killed anyway for his actions no matter the outcome of the

Read More
397 Words | 2 Pages

Juliet’s cousin, Tybalt, is one person who is responsible for the death of Romeo and Juliet. Therefore, Tybalt should be given death for his actions in Romeo and Juliet First, Tybalt was the aggressor for the entire story. He started fights and killed multiple people throughout the story. For example, the very first scene of the story is Tybalt starting a fight, setting up all the the events of the play. When facing off with Benvolio, he yells, “What, drawn, and talk of peace?

Read More
596 Words | 3 Pages

When Romeo refuses to fight, Tybalt and Mercutio become angry and fight each other. The result of this fight is that Tybalt stabs Mercutio underneath Romeo's arm. Once realising what he has done Tybalt flees from the scene of the fight. When he comes back to finish what he started, he ensures Romeo, “Thou, wretched boy, that didst consort him here. Shalt with him hence.

Read More
759 Words | 4 Pages

Many times, decisions can often be changed or supported by other people. However, one still is the one who chooses what to do, the only thing other people can do is convince you or help you. At the end of the day, it’s your decision. This is why Romeo and Juliet’s tragedy was in their own hands. Had they not done one thing, the other would not have occurred, leading to a domino effect of nightmares and just nothing going right for the two young lovers.

Read More
745 Words | 3 Pages

In William Shakespeare’s The tragedy of Romeo and Juliet, Tybalt was the cause of his own life because Tybalt has a listening problem, Tybalt has anger issues and Tybalt has grudges. Tybalt was the cause of his own death because Tybalt has a listening problem. For example, Prince says to the people who were fighting at the beginning of the story, including Tybalt, “If ever you disturb our streets again, your lives shall pay the forfeit of the peace.” (1.1.87-88).

Read More
988 Words | 4 Pages

Lastly, Tybalt is the most to blame for the events that occur in Romeo and Juliet because of the the first events he caused leading to the suicides of Romeo and Juliet. The confirmation that Tybalt is the cause of the terrible events in Romeo and Juliet is shown in the play “Romeo and Juliet” when Romeo says, “Is it even so? then I defy you, stars! Thou know ' st my lodging: get me ink and paper, and hire post-horses; I will hence tonight.”

Read More
1095 Words | 5 Pages

Tybalt is a character that highlights the theme of hate in this play right from the beginning, and is a major contributor to the tragedy between the two lovers. Tybalt's quick tempered behavior is shown at the Capulet Ball when he says, “This, by his voice, should be a Montague./ Fetch me my rapier, boy. What, dares the slave/ Come hither, cover’d with an antic face,/ To fleer and scorn at our solemnity?/ Now, by the stock and honour of my kin,/ To strike him dead I hold it not a sin.” (1.5.53-58).

Read More
560 Words | 3 Pages

Was ever book containing such vile matter So fairly bound? Oh, that deceit should dwell In such a gorgeous palace!” Juliet was sad and wanted to kill herself because Romeo got banished. Those are the 3 reasons why Tybalt is to blame for Romeo and Juliet.

Read More

More about Tybalt Is To Blame In Shakespeare's Romeo And Juliet

Open Document