Unknown In Literature Essay

In literature, the concept of unknown results from using suspense. These unknowns make readers have a feeling of discomfort about the occurrence of events based on the traits of the characters or flow of events. They make it difficult for the readers to comprehend why the characters used in the literature behave in a certain way or why certain events occur (Cunningham, Fisher, and Mays 26). This paper will explain how both Thomas Mann and Franz Kafka used the idea of unknown in their books, ‘Death in Venice’ and ‘The trial’ respectively (Mann).
The use of unknown in the book ‘Death in Venice’ has a significant impact on the message that the narrator is communicating. The author of the book has used interruptions to make the traits of Aschenbach

Quotation marks are used to show the direct words said by Aschenbach for instance when he says "too late" and also when he describe himself as ‘aging man,' here the narrator distances himself or herself from the commentary and let the characters of the novel dictate the flow of events on their own. The Internal monolog combined with self-questioning that Aschenbach engages, in contrast, the assertion of the narrator that he was not inclined to self-analysis. The rhetorical questions used by the narrator serve to interrupt Aschenbach thoughts

The book indicates that all individuals are liable for something which may be unknown, and the punishments that a person receives for his or her mistakes are not proportional to the transgression. In this novel, which bases on a secret story, mentally and logically, the author frantically tries to find the way of his guilt. In each sense, our consideration ought to be engaged principally in the court of equity the undetectable power whose impact is depicted in this book. There are indicated by two streams going through the book in a different direction. One is the endeavor by the court to influence the consciousness the court does this by attempting to make advances into the still and small voice of Joseph K's. Another is to make him understand his guilt, and give penance for it. Then again, he endeavors to get directly into the court, and in so doing he achieves some level of comprehension about the way of his guilt. It is as though both are frantically seeking after each other yet never meet hence deemed to be unknown. This is finished with something that is surrealistic and impalpable, however, a conscious masterful type of practical