Thought of conquering the world passes through the borders, disrupts the world and ponders a kind of a novel isomorphism. Slow trend of the tradition era's utilitarianism exploits dauntlessly and speculatively the context in the modern era and future is sacrificed for the moment. Try to fill the gap of the context facts, with current comfort-seeking of users, has turned into a reverse trend and in an effort to change, industrial tools have changed into the agent of destruction, and in the aftermath of this overturn, successive crises are flaunting. Previous century began with the slogan of intervention and change. And rootless cities grew in the land instead of rows of trees and disturbed move of the means of communication filled the path of waterways, and hard - live lands got more arid and barren. The present century, the relative wakefulness of the developed part of the world challenges, with caution, previous experiences, while the developing part still has a muddled dream of the previous century in its head and aggravates the ravages. Earth like all the phenomena of life has a limited capacity that cannot be ignored, let alone the hard-live lands that rarity dominates them. At this time, contextualism engages in alarming the present trend and providing reformist solutions to prevent further destruction of the environment. …show more content…
In this architecture, beauty is attained by the manner of compatibility and sometimes case conflicts that highlight the natural values. Morphological nature, available materials, building combination with the natural environment and the collective environment are used in such a way that three elements of architecture, green space, and the city are integral part of each other. Issues such as diversity, transformability, recycling and so on are other features that form the foundations of aesthetics in this