ipl-logo

Domino Theory Vietnam War

1211 Words5 Pages

America’s involvement in the Vietnam War can be explained by a series of events and decisions taken from around 1939 to 1965. The falling Domino principle is a wide accepted explanation that urged the U.S. to support the French in the Franco-Vietminh war, and eventually, after France’s withdraw, increased its involvement. This investigation will examine the Domino theory, the context and other accepted interpretations from historians, in order to answer the question of to what extent the domino theory explains U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War.
The domino theory was fist mentioned at press conference in 1954 when President Dwight Eisenhower is asked about the strategic importance of Indochina to the free world. The president answers this …show more content…

The tensions between the U.S. and the USSR after WWII had gradually increased towards a Cold War period. This period without actual fighting had a significant impact on America’s attitude towards the situation in Vietnam. Losing Vietnam to communism would not only threaten the world it would also, maybe more importantly, expose America’s weakness. Whereas the orthodox interpretation praises America for its bravery in their fight to save the world from communism, revisionist’s historians see the Vietnam War as a futile small factor in the larger Cold War Context and criticize America’s actions as aggressive and acquisitive. (21)6America would have the desire to shape the world in its own ideal image. Revisionist historians Duiker (1994) and Berman (1982) accused Kennedy of exaggerating the strategic importance of Vietnam. The territorial loss of Vietnam would not be as much as the psychological loss if America failed to contain communism while the world is watching its moves. …show more content…

to take action in the Vietminh’s fight for independence. The domino theory, which reflects America’s fear and the conviction that communism appeared to be a danger for the world, is accepted as the main reason for America’s involvement in the Vietnam War. The American presidents shared the orthodox interpretation, all believing in the containment of communism. Other factors that explain America’s involvement in the Vietnam War are the quagmire and Stalemate theory and the commitment trap. The increased commitment from previous presidents made it more difficult and challenging for the successors to withdraw from the Vietnam. Opposed from the mainly accepted orthodox interpretation, revisionist historians argue that the Vietnam War was a futile part in America’s power struggle with communist Russia in a larger Cold War context. As the tensions rose between the Soviet states, so did America’s commitment in the Vietnam

Show More
Related
700 Words | 3 Pages

Furthermore, United States’ support in Vietnam was initially supposed to be limited to training support (source A). As even United States president, Lyndon Johnson, was aware of the potential escalation of the war in Vietnam if American military forces were to involve themselves in the Vietnamese conflict. President Johnsons statement that “… we could get tied down in a third world war” (source A) substantiates the idea that America feared the worldwide consequence of American support in Vietnam (Source A). Contrary to this however,

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

A. Plan of Investigation This investigation will assess the effectiveness of Nixon 's Vietnamization Policy of the Vietnam war to end U.S. involvement. The scope of my research will assess the effectiveness of Nixon’s Vietnamization Policy to end the U.S. involvement during the Vietnam war, as well as the involvement of the women in the military, Nixon’s Doctrine, and the new economic policy that caused the end of the U.S. involvement of the Vietnam war between 1945-1975. The methods to be used in this investigation will be primary and secondary sources historical textbook in search of Nixon, 1972. This investigation will evaluate the effectiveness of the new economic policy In Search of Nixon: A Psychohistorical Inquiry.

Read More
818 Words | 4 Pages

In an attempt to rally congressional and public support for increased U.S. aid to the French, President Eisenhower gave an historic press conference on April 7, 1954. Eisenhower spent much of the speech explaining the significance of Vietnam to the United States. First was its economic importance, “ the specific value of a locality in its produce of materials that the world needs”. There was also the “possibility that

Read More
349 Words | 2 Pages

They, as conservatives, feel the extreme change in society during JFK’s presidency created problems. The authors feel Kennedy ruined America’s reputation, caused citizens to rebel, and somehow disrupted family life. This is an unfair interpretation. As, multiple times earlier in their accounts, Schweikart and Allen have shown obvious bias towards leaders who promoted change, such as FDR.

Read More
891 Words | 4 Pages

One of the most controversial wars in history and a turning point in American foreign policy, the emotions and events surrounding the Vietnam War capture the essence of the era. The rise of rebellious youth culture and anti-war and anti-draft movements were key social aspects of American life leading up to and during the fighting. (Doc 2, 3) On the political side, Congress aimed to control the Chief-Executive with legislation such as the War Powers Act of 1973, requiring the president to remove all unreported troops in Vietnam and report any further sent. (Doc 7) To say the country was divided would be a massive understatement.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

The United States was involved in the Vietnam War in the 1960s in order to support South Vietnam’s fight for an economic and cultural ties to the West. On the other hand, North Vietnam supported the ideas of a communist economy. However, the United States’s involvement in the war caused a million of dollars and lives lost, lost of faith towards the country’s government, and divided the nation instead of uniting as one. More than three million people in the war died, and out of those three million, 58,000 were Americans. The Americans and the people in South Vietnam had fought for their beliefs of a modern Westernized country while North Vietnam had fought for a communist economy.

Read More
1362 Words | 6 Pages

America’s fear of communism stretched beyond the western hemisphere; the Domino Theory became popular in the 1960s as the Vietnam War was increasingly seen as a threat to democracy in Asia. The Domino Theory is the belief that a communist victory in one nation would start a “chain reaction of communist takeovers in neighboring states. ”(Domino Theory) In the Vietnam War, this theory was used as a justification for American involvement. Communism, as understood by the American people, was a threat to peace and liberty.

Read More
473 Words | 2 Pages

The United States of America aim, since it became one of the leading World’s powers, was to fight against injustice, inequality, and for freedom of those who were jeopardized. Also, The United States of Americas was fighting for containment of communist power and stopping its spreading. Except joining World War I, with the same aim America got involved in other conflicts such as World War II, The Vietnam War, and many other conflicts. This paper will explain how these principles to fight for freedom, justice, equality and against communism were involved in American international warfare and America’s participation in World War I, World War II and The Vietnam War.

Read More
1609 Words | 7 Pages

A surprise attack led by communist troops on South Vietnam took place that day. The result was the death of over 500 American troops per week and psychological damage to the American morale. Despite American victory to drive out North Vietnamese troops out of South Vietnamese cities, the public began to question how such an attack became possible if U.S. government claims were true. Questions also arised about why the United States had to result to bombing the cities they claimed to be saving during this attack. The people were in disbelief the troops had to resort to such extremes when the government expressed military dominance throughout the war.

Read More
151 Words | 1 Pages

When political decisions are out of the hands of the public, popular ideas about how those decisions are made are likely to be astoundingly wrong. That so many Americans still believe that this country 's military presence in Vietnam was the consequence only of accidents, miscalculations, and basically benign intentions is the most striking recent example. Such popular misconceptions are strengthened by the mass media 's failure to place contemporary events in a larger historical context. While the forms of American expansionism have changed over the past 200 years, and several major shifts in the ideology surrounding U.S. imperialism have occurred, it is possible to trace this history of change systematically. Each era of expansionism

Read More
1101 Words | 5 Pages

“I thought the Vietnam war was an utter, unmitigated disaster, so it was very hard for me to say anything good about it” - George McGovern. There are numerous controversial topics dispersed among the subject of American history due to the amount of unethical decisions that have been made in order to improve the lives of the people or keep America out of the clutches of war. Throughout American history, historians have debated the ethical impact that the Vietnam war had on the United States. Although some people may believe that the Vietnam War achieved the goal of avoiding communism and protecting the people, the overarching idea is that it was an unjust war because of the countless lives that were lost from the participating countries, the

Read More
483 Words | 2 Pages

Ever since France and England at the Munich Conference in 1938 followed a policy of attempting to appease Adolf Hitler instead of challenging him after his conquest of Czechoslovakia leading to further aggression by Hitler, U.S. foreign policy has consistently veered away from appeasement toward engagement against aggression. The “Munich analogy” or the appeasement of Adolf Hitler and the disastrous results it produced has formed the underpinnings for U.S. military and foreign policy since with limited success in the few instances it has been followed. The Munich analogy was the rationale for Presidents Kennedy and Johnson for first sending troops to Vietnam to stop communist expansion into weaker countries and then again for escalating U.S. involvement in that region by sending more and more troops and resources in attempting to curtail communism. In the case of Vietnam,

Read More
969 Words | 4 Pages

Many realized that the Soviet Union was a terrible foe to face, as George Kennan, a respected American diplomat, noticed. He said in “The Sources of Soviet Conduct,” “This means

Read More
902 Words | 4 Pages

The top reasons that United States of America lost in Vietnam War was because, corruption, climate and the lack of interests. The people in the United State of America did not support the war and certainly did not appreciate how the government decided to put their hands in the foreign countries. The young soldiers when they first arrived Vietnam their bodies did not adjust to the temperature and weather in Vietnam. When the United State government sent supplies and money over to the South Vietnamese military the money went to the pocket of the people in the upper power. Back in the 1960s the technology that United State of America had was way more advanced than Vietnam.

Read More
555 Words | 3 Pages

This essay will investigate to what extent did the Strategies and Tactics used by the United States, North and South Vietnam, and the Soviet Union influence the outcome of the Vietnam war? The Vietnam War was one of the most significant war in American History. It was a war that will not be forgotten in a long time due to its surprising outcome and length of the war. One of the key roles in the war that had affected the outcome of the war were the tactics and strategies that were used by different countries. To investigate this question you will need to know about the strategies and tactics that were used by different countries.

Read More

More about Domino Theory Vietnam War

Related Topics

Open Document