Virtue Theory On Abortion

1493 Words6 Pages

Thesis paper 1
Introduction
Right to life is a sophisticated idea as demonstrated by Thompson, Rachel, Marquis among other philosophers who hold different perspectives. All the cases talk about abortion and the right to live where the arguments revolve around fetus to be human, and therefore there are moral values that when applied then the fetus should not be killed. The issue of killing and then letting just to die also comes in to show the need for high moral values that are required while dealing with life issues. The philosophers, therefore, argue on life concerning abortion, killing someone and just letting someone die.
Q1
The discussion on the right to life is given a different perspective by Thompson when in the article she …show more content…

The proper position does not only mean the word right but an exemplary and accurate stance on specific issues, and in that case, it is precisely on the power of the fetus. The suggestion given is that fetus is also relevant to the wrongness or rightness of abortion. But according to the argument then it is imperative to know the status of the fetus so that one attains the wisdom and be a virtuous person into knowing the truth about the state of the fetus (Hall, 411). The virtue theory seems confusing since it is coherent for some reasons as to why the fetus has the right to life when it talks about the truth and virtue. Some people will not have the moral certainty and will kill the fetus for that reason. Of course in the argument the author gives choices, and the decision depends on the understanding of that individual towards …show more content…

Active euthanasia considers the role that ethical issues do to differentiate between euthanasia from other forms of killing and just letting someone die. Let’s take an example where a patient is responsible for their death, then that can be called suicide (Hall, 416). Therefore, euthanasia, whether it is active or passive merely imply the engagement of other individuals and thus the motives of the patient, is not a pivotal issue to decide on the morality of euthanasia but the reasons of those who bring about the personal death is considered. There Is a significant disparity between active and passive euthanasia in their motivation where active euthanasia in only a riding factor in the society of those individuals who are a burden to that society while passive euthanasia while passive is the intentions of those who contribute to the