Voltaire And John Locke Similarities

Locke
John Locke obtained wisdom from his perception of the world through senses and was an empiricist. Due to this, Locke thought in the idea of tabula rasa that humans have no inherent beliefs or concept about anything without the use of the senses. Any experience had two components, sensation and consideration. The occasions of experiencing new things that later on grew through reflection to contrast qualities to name such particular action were sensations. Essentially being able to differentiate experiences through qualities and quantities can somone reflect on what is new or old. Similar to Descartes, Locke believed in two principles primary and secondary. Main features were quantifiable and unchanging attributes that were consistently

Its geographical influence was particularly from France throughout the eighteenth century. Many philosophers, Montesquieu and Voltaire being two of the more prominent examples, began to realize basic principles to mankind. There was a movement leading to resistance to the established rule as people started to understand the concept which was that all people had natural rights. These rights are justified to be acknowledged and protected by their government. Due to the logic and what was clear was the key factor the philosophers used, the general public was beginning to become aware with the notion that ignorance could lead to poverty and superstition was a tool for those in authority to keep the masses in check. This era of philosophical movement was known by its effect on the general public to demand what was naturally theirs, natural rights, and to end the free rule of tyranny by their governments through the use of free thinking. Many of the principles of this movement were key benefactors in the formation of the United Nations as the principles had the public realize their desire to unite for the achievement of equal

Kierkegaard constantly battled the idea that other well-known philosophers have failed to represent the true essences of self-responsibility. Growing up and experiencing a majorly overbearing life, Kierkegaard grew older as a critic of his surroundings. Out of the countless of factors that Kierkegaard did not tolerate, individuals who neglected their religion was number one on his list. This is due to the fact that religion played a very important role in his life, and it was a method of living rather than the ordinary weekly meetings that many Christians attended on Sunday. The ideal train of thought and field of philosophy of Kierkegaard was majorly focused on existentialism. Existentialism to him had to deal with the living, human beings and their ways of interacting with their surroundings. One of his many arguments that he has constantly emphasized was objectivity. Objectivity to him meant that every single individual possesses their way to a truthful life. He was a strong critic of conformism and as a result, highlighted the three stages of life which include the following: the ethical stage, the aesthetic stage, and finally the religious stage. Additionally, he emphasized that individuals are held accountable for the many times they alternate between all three of these