Voting Rights Act Of 1965: A Comparative Analysis

1271 Words6 Pages

In order to ensure that all racial/ethnic minority groups in the United States have the equal rights as their majority counterpart, Congress passed the Voting Rights Act (VRA) and the Immigration and Naturalization Amendments (INA) in 1965. Both the Voting Rights Act and the Immigration and Naturalization Amendments were of civil rights origins: they were enacted in the midst of the civil rights movement. And each of them served a function in a reaction to overtly racist legal practices that marginalized communities of color for generations. On one hand, The Voting Rights Act of 1965 reflects Congress’ intention to rid of the racial discrimination in voting such as changes in elections. On the other hand, the Immigration and Naturalization Amendments shows for Congress’ intention to remove all formal racial restrictions from immigration law by changing immigration policy. In other words, Congress sought to alter the United States’ long engagement with racism by enacting these two pieces of legislation in 1965 (Hernandez, 2015: 168-173; Shaw et. al., 2015). My thesis is that by allowing these two pieces of legislation to become laws, Congress has succesfully extended the same rights to other non-white minority groups in the United States. …show more content…

In other words, the Voting Rights Act was passed to make sure that every American citizen, regardless of their race/ethnicity, has an equal opportunity to raise their opinions and vote for their