ipl-logo

Ward Churchill's Using Indian Names For Sports Team

644 Words3 Pages

In Using Indian Names for Sports Teams Harm Native Americans, Ward Churchill discusses why using names like the Washington “Redskins,” Colorado “Savages,” or Kansas City “Chiefs,” are a racist practice and should be put to stop. The team’s mascots also use feathers, beads, spears, and “war paint” in an attempt to look like stereotypical Native Americans. Churchill says many American Indians have been against he uses of native names, gestures, and symbols. Churchill recognizes the rough historical relationship between natives and the non-natives. Certainly, colonization detrimentally effected many Natives, and the American Government historically has moved Natives out of their own land. Native Americans still fight for their land, which is evident …show more content…

The teams claim they do not want to insult but honor Native Americans, and it is all in “good, clean fun.” They claim sports should be fun and leisurely without complaining because there is enough bad in the world. Churchill counters by saying if it is all in playful fun then why not use certain names and symbols from other ethnic groups. Churchill suggest using the N-word to honor Afro-Americans, and players will wear leopard skins and fake bones in their noses. Churchill includes other groups like Hispanics, which could be the Galveston “Greasers” or Wisconsin “Wetbacks”. Asian Americans could be represented by logos that have slanted eyes, buck teeth, big glasses. Churchill continues by saying there are white teams that are centered on ethnicity but could be renamed. The Fighting Irish of Notre Dame can be called “Drunken Irish”. Churchill even includes gender and sexual preference like the St. Louis “Sluts,” or Detroit “Dykes,” Churchill says, “None of this is demeaning or insulting, at least now when it’s being done to Indians.” He explains why there are demeaning names and symbols used. Compared to other groups Native Americans are seen as a small group of people and are too weak to defend themselves against offensive …show more content…

The university dropped the name “Indians” and attendance was not affected. Churchill believes other teams should follow Stanford and treat the situation as dehumanization as Germans did Jewish people in Nazi Germany. Julius Streicher, a publisher and editor, was known for publishing many anti-Semitic articles. The articles dehumanized Jewish people and was declared “a crime against humanity.” Churchill says, “[Dehumanization] In turn, made it possible-or at least easier-for average Germans to later indulge in the outright liquidation of Jewish vermin.” He explains Native Americans have faced a serious decline in population as a result of dehumanization. Native Americans have been forced out of their land, forced to assimilate, been subjects of forced sterilization, and given vaccines already banned by the government. Churchill attributes this to a “crime against humanity” and should be treated as

Show More
Related
736 Words | 3 Pages

In the book, Benching Jim Crow: The Rise and Fall of the Color Line in Southern College Sports, written by Martin H. Charles. Charles H. Martin is an associate professor of history at the University of Texas at El Paso. The book, is divided into different eras that range from 1890 to 1980. Charles’ reveals how southern colleges implemented their racially exclusive programs and then integrated to a diverse competition. The first section of the book is called “Gentlemen’s Agreement” which occurred from 1890 to 1929.

Read More
124 Words | 1 Pages

When people talk about mascots being named after Indian cultures they think that the Indians being recognized should feel honored. However, when that team plays their rival the other fans are taught to hate those people causing them to hear hateful and degrading comments throughout their lives. “If it’s the team’s tradition, then it’s a legacy of bigotry.” (Wulf). People don’t show respect for Native Americans they use them to create a profit.

Read More
704 Words | 3 Pages

In August 2011, when Jack Shakely’s article “Indian mascots — you're out” first appeared on the op-ed page of the LA Times in August 2011, I was attending college in China as a member of a minority nationality. On campus, the majority students, which are the Han nationality, often laughed at the customs of ethnic minorities. It is so similar to the status of the Native American that I support Shakely’s assertions that we should leave the logos of minority out of school. In his article, Shakely elaborated that the first lesson he learned from his mother about the Indians portrayed as sports team mascots left an indelible impression on him; likewise, he mentioned about the controversy between the tribe and some universities about the use of Native

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

Stretten uses this example with the Washington Redskins. "The team's owner, Dan Snyder, refuses to change the team's name despite the obvious offensive nature of the imagery and name itself." (Stretten 524-25) Appropriately, she also talks about the fans who, some of which, go to football games arrayed in offensive Indian-looking garb, and wear war paint on their faces while they attempt to impersonate a stereotypical Indian. And although some claim that it shows respect, she retorts that she doesn't, "understand how face paint purchased from a drug store and a faux headdress made of brown construction paper and dyed arts and crafts feathers was respect."

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

Recently, the use of controversial words has become a heavily debated topic and has gained international attention as seemingly truthful statements to some, cause insult to others. The Times article "Why 'Redskins' Is a Bad Word", by acclaimed linguist and professor John McWhortor, was published around the time the use of the word Redskin was being debated. In the article, McWhortor aims to clarify the condemnation of the word Redskin, by suggesting that the offence does not stem from the literal definition of such words, but instead the negative and often derogatory connotations the words have. McWhorter begins by introducing the recent discussions surrounding the use of the word Redskins, especially the actions taken by Californian schools

Read More
1043 Words | 5 Pages

“Redskin” is an extremely derogatory term used to describe the reputed color of a Native American 's skin tone. Along with the simply disrespectful terminology, the phrase has a history of being used alongside bounty for the scalping of Native Americans, so it is without a doubt offensive to many people. Washington 's choice to continue using the word as a name for their popular sports team has been the cause of much controversy. Despite the pleas of millions of people, advocacy groups and even government officials to change the name, the sports team remains unchanged. Even the United States Patent and Trademark Office has refused the renewal of their name, logo and likeness, citing the combination as “disparaging to Native Americans" National public opinion polls have found that 60 to 83 percent of the general public supports the teams ' decision to continue using the name, yet only a small majority of fans think the term is offensive to Native

Read More
534 Words | 3 Pages

They do not view this as honorable, it is seen as their name being worn as a costume. The cultural appropriation that comes along with these mascots lead to the stereotypes being seen as a reality. So many Native Americans are now fighting for this, they have created a twitter campaign to spread awareness to this. The term “redskins” comes off as racist; it is basing them off of their skin tone and color. Many people who argue that the team name should remain are the same ones who say they do not see your “color of skin”.

Read More
522 Words | 3 Pages

Thesis: The English were a prideful group, entangled in ethnocentrism, that caused a condescending and harsh treatment of the Native Americans, while the Native Americans were actually a dynamic and superior society, which led to the resentment and strife between the groups. P1: English view of Native Americans in VA Even though the English were subordinates of the Powhatan, they disrespected him and his chiefdom due to their preconceived beliefs that they were inferior. “Although the Country people are very barbarous, yet have they amongst them such government...that would be counted very civil… [by having] a Monarchical government” (Smith 22). John Smith acknowledges the “very civil” government of the Natives but still disrespected them by calling them “very barbarous,” which

Read More
1398 Words | 6 Pages

Another argument against using Native American mascots is that banning them is an important step toward creating a more inclusive and respectful society and environment in schools and sports. The use of Native American mascots can create a hostile environment for Native American students, families, and fans, who may feel belittled and disrespected. By banning these mascots, schools, and sports teams are taking an extreme step toward making a more welcoming and inclusive environment for all students, families, and

Read More
847 Words | 4 Pages

Native Americans flourished in North America, but over time white settlers came and started invading their territory. Native Americans were constantly being thrown and pushed off their land. Sorrowfully this continued as the Americans looked for new opportunities and land in the West. When the whites came to the west, it changed the Native American’s lives forever. The Native Americans had to adapt to the whites, which was difficult for them.

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

Over the past few years, the controversy over sports names or mascots has increasingly become an uproar. The main sports teams being targeted due to controversial mascots are programs having names that deal with Native Americans. Well known programs, such as, the Atlanta Braves, Cleveland Indians, and the Washington Redskins are just a few of the many teams being targeted due to controversial team names and/or mascots. Currently, the Redskins are receiving the most heat from racial groups. However, professional sport teams are not the only teams receiving negative remarks; there are well known colleges that are also receiving huge blows for racial symbols.

Read More
951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More
946 Words | 4 Pages

The final concern in which needs to be addressed is the fact that these negative stereotypes of Native Americans make it very dangerous for them because of the rise of crime rates against the Natives. The rates for crimes against the Natives has increased and puts many of them in danger. These crimes are classified as hate crimes because of the fact that these crimes are done in hatred of them as a people and not a personal cause. According to Department of Justice analysis, "American Indians are more likely than people of other races to experience violence at the hands of someone of a different race." These factors only show that we need to take serious actions soon in order to prevent this violence to continue before its too

Read More
526 Words | 3 Pages

This causes people to get upset over it and try to get the team to change the name. “The use of racially derogatory or discriminatory school or

Read More
1058 Words | 5 Pages

Adam Sorenson Prof. Riggs COMP 01112 2/12/18 Misrepresentation of Native Americans Native American’s for many years now have been viewed as lone warriors or squaw, some people don’t even know that they still exist! People just think of the Native American people in storybook tales and nothing more then that. The Native Americans have been living in the United States for awhile now and were the first ones on the country’s soil. They were here way before Christopher Columbus and the other European Colonists even discovered America and they are still present in the U.S.

Read More

More about Ward Churchill's Using Indian Names For Sports Team

Related Topics

Open Document