ipl-logo

Warren's Objection To The Abortion Debate

699 Words3 Pages

Abortion is controversial issue, which is debated around the world. People have different views of reason why, it should be permissible or impermissible. Abortion is topic that challenges the ideals of many people’s views. The specific view that is going to be discussed is the Warren and the infanticide objection argument. This argument implies having an abortion should be permissible, but it holds a moral objection to abortion. Since abortion has been a very controversial issue in our country for the past couple of decades. Several people argue that when a woman gets an abortion, she is taking away a life. The guilt and sorrow that comes along with having an abortion is very challenging. But who is anyone to tell anyone, what to do with his or her body and life. However, I think that abortion can be seen as a form of taking away an innocent life, it is important to take into reason that some circumstances leave some women with no other option to have the abortion. So in general, I think there is nothing wrong with women getting abortions because it is their own body, their life, and ultimately their choice. …show more content…

This brings up the distinction between a “person” and “biological human ”. This means before a woman gives birth to a baby, she has a biological embryo inside her womb. Which makes the point that the embryo has right to have a conscious. This conscious that baby have can be able to feel pain and emotion. Warren does not claim that the embryo has a right to live because it’s not a person, therefore a person has a right to live, which it has a right to

Show More
Related
625 Words | 3 Pages

However, she continues on to state that neither the abortion of a fetus nor the killing of a neonate could count as murder of a person because both, a fetus and an infant, lack all of the plausible components of personhood. Warren explicates that in an impoverished society that is unable to care for its infants without jeopardizing the health and safety of its members, infanticide cannot be deemed morally wrong. She also claims that infanticide is morally justified in the form of euthanasia where the child is born with severe abnormalities and the parents are unable to afford the financial and emotional burdens of its treatment. Warren’s response to infanticide is completely justified because in case of life or death, the life of an actual person far outweighs the life of a potential

Read More
769 Words | 4 Pages

Abortion Is Morally Permissible written by Mary Anne Warren, argues for abortion. Warren claims that there are five traits of personhood. Since the fetus doesn’t have any of the five traits, they’re not a person and therefore abortion is permissible. She also mentions that in the case of late term abortion of a pregnancy that may cause inconvenience, it is morally permissible. Also the fetus’s potential right to live doesn’t outweigh the women’s right to an abortion.

Read More
1111 Words | 5 Pages

She then goes on to infer that a fetus is only a genetic human, not morally human, based on the rejection of five traits that, in her opinion, are “most central to the concept of personhood…and [moral] humanity,” which are the following: consciousness, reasoning, self-motivated activity, the capacity to communicate, and the presence of self-concepts. Regarding these characteristics, Warren believes it is “so obvious” that a fetus is not a person because it does not satisfy “none of” the traits and thus does not have “full moral rights.” Lastly, regarding genetic and moral humanity, Warren states that there are “people who are not human beings,” and, in the case of fetuses, “human beings [who] are not people…” Thus, Warren argues that abortion is morally permissible because fetuses are not people and do not have a right to life.

Read More
542 Words | 3 Pages

The Keynote Address: Untying the Moral Knot of Abortion, was given by Caitlin E. Borgmann at the Washington and Lee School of law on November 8, 2014. Borgmann’s main goal of her address was to bring back to attention that abortion should be seen as a woman’s own right in making decisions regarding her own body. She talks about how people have become so focused on the morality of the fetus that they have lost sight of the real reason that abortion should be legal. Borgmann feels that it is the woman’s right to have a choice and freedom over their body and the freedom to choose whether or not to have an abortion. The speaker asks why people question the age and status of the fetus, but do not concern themselves to question the rights of the woman that carries the fetus.

Read More
763 Words | 4 Pages

However this fuels the social attitude in which women must seek permission, when many consider abortion to be a right which all women should have access too. This poses the question of if limiting the rights of women is ever justifiable in the best interests of the baby, the roman catholic church argue that a foetus is a person from the moment of conception this means that they to are entitled to the same rights of the mother and to have an abortion is to murder a living being. From this perspective it is apparent that they argue it is justifiable to put the rights of the foetuses; despite this point when a foetus is though to gain rights is a key point to this argument. As personhood would determine when a foetus is able to gain rights, although critics would argue that even still this does not warrant them to have the same full rights that the mother would

Read More
794 Words | 4 Pages

Warren’s claim is meant to support the idea that is acceptable to abort a fetus, which is considered a “potential person,” no matter what stage of development it is in because that would then be taking away the rights of the woman, which is considered an actual person. Unlike Warren, Patrick Lee and Robert P George claim “…

Read More
1103 Words | 5 Pages

The issue of abortion creates questions such as whether or not abortion is morally justifiable, rights of a fetus, and explores the criteria necessary to be proven as a person. To summarize, Mary Ann Warren believes the choice of abortion is always the mothers choice. Warren continuously supports this statement through the argument that a fetus is not a person unless they exhibit a sense of moral being, demonstration of the five traits of personhood, and secures the rights that true human beings rights prevails the rights of fetus, regardless of potentiality or value of any

Read More
1000 Words | 4 Pages

Abortion is one of the most argued topics for several different reasons, and while abortion kills a fetus to end a woman’s pregnancy, supporters of abortion say that abortion is beneficial to many women in society. One of the reasons why people argue about abortion is that in some perspectives, abortion is preserved by the United States Constitution, while other perspectives show that there is no connection between abortion and the Constitution. The impact of the Roe v. Wade supreme court case involving abortion resulted in the decision making process of women about having an abortion, though abortion was not considered to be a constitutional right by some people in the United States (Sullivan). In contrast to how abortion was not considered

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

Judith Jarvis Thomson, the author of this article, provides several defenses for abortion, but makes it crystal clear that possessing the right to abort does not equal to the right to kill. A fetus may be seen as an innocent human being with the right to live, but there are plenty of reasons why abortion may be justified. This is an issue that anti-abortion protestors seem to overlook. Pro-life advocates seem to sympathize and empathize with a pregnant woman’s right to decide whether motherhood is just for herself and just for society. Human development is the premise for Pro-Life advocates.

Read More
353 Words | 2 Pages

Controversy surrounds almost every modern issue we face. One of the most controversial topics is abortion. Some believe that women should get the choice to abort their baby and others believe that abortion should be outlawed as they see it as a form of murder. In the article “Government had no role in my late-term abortion struggle. Let's keep it that way” by Brie Loskota, she discusses her perspective on abortion.

Read More
1322 Words | 6 Pages

A right is that of an entitlement to be free to engage in some activity, to exercise a certain power, or to be provided with some benefit. As people, we all have specific rights that allow us to do as we please, to a certain extent. In this argument on abortion, people have the right to make their own decisions. Warren’s ethical thesis shows that because a fetus is not human, it is not morally wrong to terminate the pregnancy. After this is shown, the “rights holder” makes the decision based on this conclusion.

Read More
991 Words | 4 Pages

But when it comes down to it who should have the say in the abortion ? It should be the women

Read More
430 Words | 2 Pages

Abortion is the intentional removal of a fetus from the womb. The Traditional Argument against Abortion asserts how unethical it is to kill an “innocent human being.” This argument also says fetus are considered innocent human beings; therefore, it is wrong to kill fetuses. Warren often critiques this and believes abortion is ethically admissible under any conditions and at any point of pregnancy. The traditional argument against abortion uses equivocation where one uses the same word, human, but shifts the meaning of it.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

Regardless of what the right to life arguments states, Judith Jarvis Thomson argues that abortion is morally permissible even if a fetus is granted its right to life. In Thomson’s “In Defense of Abortion” takes apart the right to life argument and finds its hypocrisy because some prohibitive views go against its own belief. She mentions that the right to

Read More
863 Words | 4 Pages

Abortion is a very sensitive issue. Many people are constantly debating whether or not abortion should be allowed or not. Some people think abortion is very bad and that it should not be allowed at all. They think abortion is like committing murder as it is killing the human fetus. Others feel that the parents should have the right to choose and it is not murder until the baby is born.

Read More

More about Warren's Objection To The Abortion Debate

Related Topics

Open Document