Was Andrew Jackson A King Than The Hero Of Common Men?

691 Words3 Pages

President Andrew Jackson was a good president. He let all people know they were all equal and even let the economy know they were equal. Even though he did great business in the United States, he still acted more as a King than a common man. He made all his decisions based on what he thought, in all, the Spoils System, Hard Money, and the Indian Removal Act. Here are some reasons of why he is more of a King than the “hero of common men”. To begin, President Jackson was a powerful man. He had many people who worked for him, but he wanted new workers. (Andrew Jackson Slideshow) Jackson fired most of the people who worked for him because he believed the government needed new faces. Jackson got all the new workers, he wanted. Most “common man” …show more content…

(Indian Removal Policy) The Indians were civil people, they didn't want to fight to get the land they deserved, they wanted to go to the courts. Indians brought Jackson to court so they could claim their land. The judge in the Supreme Court ruled in favor of the Indians, therefore Indians could stay/keep the land they were living at. Jackson said “the supreme court made their ruling, but watch me enforce it”. President Jackson took into his own hands to force the Indians out west. He had no right to do so because the ruling had already been in place, they won, making them have the right to stay. Jackson was supposed to let them stay, but instead, he disregarded the Supreme Court's decision and the moved the Indians himself, causing the “Trail of Tears”. On the other hand, Jackson did expand voting requirements for the white men, and if it wasn’t for Jackson, most men would not have been able to vote that soon. (Jacksonian Democracy Characteristics) On that note, Jackson was the “Hero of common man”. Also Jackson said all people are equal, which let others do as they wanted. He made sure everyone was safe in the US, while he was president. Jackson also limited the power of the federal government because he wanted to make clear that all the components of the government didn’t have more power than the others, they were all