ipl-logo

Was Andrew Jackson Justified In The Indian Removal Act

1296 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Consequences of indian removal act

The authors of each article tackle the daunting task of representing the Indian Removal Act, the Trail of Tears, and president Andrew Jacksons approach, appropriately while also including their own personal opinions. They also must back up their points with fact and reason. Each author has a unique opinion compared to the others, and when read all together, provide a better understanding from multiple sides and sources. The question the authors debate is whether Andrew Jackson was justified in his removal of Native Americans by use of the Indian Removal Act of 1830. Was he protecting the safety of the Native Americans by moving them, or was he only progressing the agenda of the white man? The last two articles are primary sources from Andrew …show more content…

On one hand there’s Wallace’s work, which condemns the president, calling him cowardly and weak. While Remini’s work says the complete opposite, describing Jackson as a man of the people who did what nobody else would. The authors use lots of primary sources including the address to congress. Wallace writes about how during the address Jackson does not seem interested in personifying the natives. They also use historical events, such as the trail of tears to further their points. After reading the articles it is clear that both authors make great points that leave the reader thinking. However, Andrew Jackson should be blamed for the horrible injustice that occurred to the Native Americans. In no way shape or form can the death of some 4,000 people, guilty by only the color of their skin and the place in which they were born, be defended let alone justified. Indian Removal was a terrible disaster that should never occurred. Indians should’ve been allowed to keep their land and keep their ideals. With more thought and time Andrew Jackson could have come up with a way to integrate natives into society, without removing them entirely. It seems as though America gave up on a people willing to sacrifice their heritage and forget their culture to be a part of this country, and that in itself is a monumental

Show More
Related

The Long Bitter Trail Summary

1426 Words | 6 Pages

The Long, Bitter Trail: Andrew Jackson and the Indians written by Anthony F.C. Wallace is the story of the Native Americans being forced to move west in America in the 19th century. Wallace begins by introducing the desire for Native American land in the U.S. and ends with the aftermath of the Removal Policy and the legacy that still lives today. The book is organized into four chapters; The Changing Worlds of the Native Americans, The Conflict over Federal Indian Policy, The Removal Act, and The Trail of Tears.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

170 Words | 1 Pages

In the article “Abuse of Power: Andrew Jackson and the Indian Removal Act of 1830,” the author, Alfred A. Cave, writes about President Jackson’s abuse of power. He is arguing that Jackson abused his power when he was enforcing the Indian Removal Act. He argues that Jackson broke guarantees he made to the Indians. He uses a political methodology and uses secondary sources.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Jackson Dbq

982 Words | 4 Pages

Jackson was a democratic republican who was voted into office in 1828. During the election against john quincy adams , he appealed to the people through the common man. Because he was born in North Carolina , he presented many ideas that would benefit the common man. He also used the spoil system in order to gain supporters. The spoil system enabled people to get a position in government as long as they voted for him.

Read More

Summary Of Andrew Jackson And His Indian War

995 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States of America, was elected to presidency in the country’s 1828 elections. It was however on June 28, 1830, that Jackson signed the Indian Removal Act and in turn, allowed the relocation of Indians in areas far from the white settlements. The new law gave Jackson power to provide the voluntary relocation of Indians to the trans-Mississippi West. In “Andrew Jackson and His Indian Wars” Remini gives insight in the relationship Jackson had with the Native Americans. Whilst Jackson is portrayed as a slave owner and racist, Remini explains the man’s logic with regard to the hierarchy of men in the United States.

Read More

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 Dbq Essay

684 Words | 3 Pages

A Shameful Part of American History The Indian Removal Act of 1830 was America’s first attempt to legally remove Native Americans from their land. This primary source was created by the Senate and House of Representatives, and it was backed by President Andrew Jackson. Passed on May 28th, the act allowed the for the relocation of Natives west of the Mississippi River. This order was a result of Manifest Destiny which was the belief that it was the United State’s God-given right to expand westward.

Read More

Indian Removal Act Of 1830 DBQ

1184 Words | 5 Pages

The lack of respect through the spoken word of Jackson proved to be racist to the Indians. Andrew Jackson wanted to obtain the land from the Native Americans,and he wanted to keep on pushing them westward until they were annihilated or just disappeared somewhere where they were not in the way of white men. It’s quite obvious through his statements that Jackson cared very little for the Indians. If you don’t respect someone, then you can’t possibly care for them. Andrew Jackson, a leader for our nation, went around calling the Native Americans “red men”, “savages”, and people with “rude institutions.”

Read More

On Indian Removal Speech, And Samuel's Memory

671 Words | 3 Pages

Both show an event in history in very different lights, showing the world that words have the power to make something into something it’s not. In his speech, Jackson makes the Indian Removal sound like a great idea, why Rutledge shows the horrors that his ancestor and their people had to endure during this horrible period in history. One very obvious difference in the texts is bias. Bias is a very important thing to consider in documents, especially when considering why something bad may be shown in a good light.

Read More

Andrew Jackson Hero Research Paper

480 Words | 2 Pages

Although this act was harsh, to some it overshadows the good that Jackson did. In the source: Letter from Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Indian, Elias says, “Removal, then, is the only remedy, the only practical remedy. Our people may finally rise from their very ashes, to become prosperous and happy, and a credit to our race.” The quote is from a Cherokee Indian agreeing that the removal might be the best thing for the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson is a hero because he worked to bring more democracy to the

Read More

Westward Expansion Dbq

893 Words | 4 Pages

So what? Comparably, President Andrew Jackson’s message to Congress on Indian removal discusses Jackson’s plan to remove Indigenous peoples from inhabited lands. Jackson said that Indigenous peoples were just a few thousand “savages” who were the reason why America was not growing and expanding economically (Document E). By removing those few thousand Indigenous peoples, Jackson promised that the other twelve million Americans would prosper economically, as well as civilly, religiously, and flourish as a nation. So what?

Read More

Trail Of Tears Research Paper

1086 Words | 5 Pages

The Genocide: Trail of Tears/ The Indian removal act During the 1830s the united states congress and president Andrew Jackson created and passed the “Indian removal act”. Which allowed Jackson to forcibly remove the Indians from their native lands in the southeastern states, such as Florida and Mississippi, and send them to specific “Indian reservations” across the Mississippi river, so the whites could take over their land. From 1830-1839 the five civilized tribes (The Cherokee, Choctaw, Seminole, and Chickasaw) were forced, sometimes by gun point, to march about 1,000 miles to what is present day Oklahoma.

Read More

Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

865 Words | 4 Pages

Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

Read More

Andrew Jackson's Economic Policy

1064 Words | 5 Pages

The results of assimilation demonstrate another method of removing the Natives from their territory, and in a process that was fabricated to fit the government’s best economic interest. On the other hand, removal could be seen as a change in the economic policy because it differs from the goal of assimilation. This proves to be incorrect when understanding that assimilation’s main purpose was to obtain more land for the US, which was also the reasoning behind Jackson’s removal of the Natives. Therefore, the identical US economic policy prevailed due to the country’s ongoing desire to take Native American

Read More

Why Is Andrew Jackson Wrong

552 Words | 3 Pages

The Indian Removal Act is going to be controversial bill that is going to help President Andrew Jackson complete two things which was pay the national debt of with Indian Land Sales and most importantly move the Native American out of East, especially Georgia, to open new land for eager white settlers. In a letter from Alfred Balch to Andrew Jackson on January 8, 1830, Alfred said that about the possibility of the removal act, “The removal of the Indians would be an act of seeming violence. But it will prove in the end an act of enlarged philanthropy.” He went on to write, “…cannot exist in a state of Independence, in the vicinity of the white man.”

Read More

Why Is The Indian Removal Act Called The Trail Of Tears

978 Words | 4 Pages

Trail of Tear In the 19th century, the U.S. decides to expand it territories into the homelands of the Cherokee, Creek, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole (also known as the “Five Civilized Tribes”). Destroying the homes of the natives all for growing cotton. Such an unlawful act for a selfish reason. Starting with Andrew Jackson and the Indian removal act leading to tension rising between the tribes. Contributing to the to the split of the cherokees at pea ridge and the battle of Wilson's creek.

Read More

Native Americans In The 19th Century

951 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the 19th century Native Americans were treated far less than respectful by the United States’ government. This was the time when the United States wanted to expand and grow rapidly as a land, and to achieve this goal, the Native Americans were “pushed” westward. It was a memorable and tricky time in the Natives’ history, and the US government made many treatments with the Native Americans, making big changes on the Indian nation. Native Americans wanted to live peacefully with the white men, but the result of treatments and agreements was not quite peaceful. This precedent of mistreatment of minorities began with Andrew Jackson’s indian removal policies to the tribes of Oklahoma (specifically the Cherokee indians) in 1829 because of the lack of respect given to the indians during the removal laws.

Read More

More about Was Andrew Jackson Justified In The Indian Removal Act

Related Topics

Open Document