Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Was asoka an enlightened ruler
Was asoka an enlightened ruler
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Was asoka an enlightened ruler
Was asoka an enlightened ruler
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Asoka: Ruthless Conqueror Or Enlightened Ruler Asoka an indian ruler was more of an enlightened ruler like a nice person than an ruthless conqueror like hammurabi who killed a lot of people. There is a lot of evidence for why Asoka is an enlightened ruler. Some evidence is where he expanded his land. Also, how nice or mean Asoka was. Then finally, what his religion is.
Asoka could have figured out a peace deal with the Kalingan Empire so the Mauryan Empire could use the trade routes and the Kalingans could still have their kingdom. Instead, Asoka decided to conquer Kalinga, resulting in hundreds of thousands of deaths. Numerous pieces of evidence demonstrates that Asoka was an enlightened ruler who helped pave roads, supported and sent Buddhist teachers to spread the religion, and planted trees for shade. Unfortunately, his ruthlessness led to thousands of innocent lives taken, which is a greater loss than building roads and spreading Buddhist
Is Asoka a ruthless conqueror or is he a knowledgeable ruler? Asoka is one of the most acknowledged rulers of the Mauryan Empire. He ruled most of India over 2,000 years ago. Although he may be the greatest ruler of the Mauryan Empire, Asoka is still a merciless emperor because he has done many remorseful things that shall not be forgiven such as exterminating thousands of people and he has also conquered many lands to enhance his kingdom. Several individuals have been slaughtered by the hands of Asoka.
Alexander killed an estimated of 100,000 enemy soldiers, and innocent civilians throughout his rein. (Doc. E). He killed all these people just because he wanted more land to gain more power. Most of these people did nothing to Alexander and had no affect on his life except they were an obstacle in the way of him gaining more power. Also Alexander killed a full army in East India because he saw a major opportunity to take control of land from one of the biggest empires.
However, he warns that he may conquer them if they don’t agree. Although this seems vicious, it shows that he wants peace with other tribes. Also, historians believe that Asoka was the first important ruler to promote Buddhism. His messengers traveled as far as Egypt, Sri Lanka, Syria, and Greece to spread Dharma. This further supports that Asoka was an enlightened
Like many children her age, the girl in Julie Otsuka’s novel When the Emperor was Divine had the opportunity to attend a “summer camp.” However, the camps that the girl and her family endured were not like traditional summer getaways but instead state-sponsored prisons designed to keep the populace “safe.” Instead of enjoying the water slides and rope swings that other children her age got to experience, the girl struggled with establishing an identity that fit with the rest of her society. With her use of neutral tone and language, Julie Otsuka explores the creation of the cultural identity that is established by the Japanese-American people as they are confined in Concentration camps designed to keep the nation safe. Pulled from their homes,
Many people may say that Asoka was a ruthless conqueror because of his conquest of Kalinga which was a bloody battle where many people died and many more were driven out of their country, but I bet the evidence I will show you will make you believe he was an enlightened ruler. From 268 BCE to 232 BCE Asoka was the ruler of the Mauryan Empire, which is now known as India. During that time many of his actions shows that he was enlightened. First, the conquest of Kalinga which many people think was ruthless was something that the Mauryan people needed so I believe that battle was one of an enlightened ruler rather than a ruthless conqueror. Asoka can also be considered an enlightened ruler because he went on a pilgrimage looking for a teacher and after finding a Buddhist monk and following his instructions he was able to understand history, reject violence, and form ideas that had never been thought of before.
He found a Buddhist monk who guided him to enlightenment. This shows that Asoka was not only enlightened spiritually, but as a leader too. Asoka had gone out of his way to change his faith so he could discontinue what he realized was wrong. Finally, he not only changed his faith and mindset but also worked tremendously hard to be forgiven. According to Wood, Asoka had also given “rich gifts to the poor'' while on a path of nonviolence (Document C).
In Ancient India, the people named their flag after Asoka. He did great things for the Mauryan Empire that gave a good ending, but were the means of the ending just? Asoka ruled Ancient India and changed the history of it doing good and bad things for himself but for his empire. Was it being Ruthless or Enlightened? His responsibility for many deaths, his wanting of unfair wars, the unjust laws all clearly imply that Asoka is a Ruthless Conqueror.
He showed his sense of self when he became his own person with spirits, shrewdness, and imagination. (xviii) His transformation was proven in his journey of risk taking, danger, family, and friendships that can be told the next generation as well
Civil Disobedience by Thoreau is the refusal to obey government demands or commands and nonresistance to consequent arrest and punishment this had an extreme effect on Martin Luther King Jr and Mahatma Gandhi. They were fighting for different beliefs. However they both had the same believes about civil disobedience and they both end in the same place, jail. In the first place Gandhi believed that the only way to confronted injustice was with non-violent methods.
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
Violence was much more powerful than we imagine not only because it led tremendous dis- aster, but also due to the deep impact on individuals. In the book of the Outsiders, the violence of Johnny’s family, the other greasers, and their opposing gangs, the Socials, strongly affected Johnny. The Violence of Johnny’s family impacts Johny’s natural instincts, which means that some of his characteristics were already fixed since he was born, and influenced him in daily life. Johnny grew up in a family without care, love, and understanding.
His use of free will allowed for him to become the One and help the cause he
Compare the ways in which the poets strikingly portray the women and their lives in these two poems; Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers and Still Life In the poems; Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers, by Adrienne Rich and Still Life, by Elizabeth Daryush; there are certain themes that are presented to the reader in a contrasting manner. The poet in the poem, Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers, uses the idea of a tiger to convey the fears and desires of Aunt Jennifer; however, the poet in the poem, Still Life, uses the idea of a breakfast table to convey the level of freedom that the young heiress has. Firstly, in the poem, Aunt Jennifer’s Tigers, the tiger is described as an active yet, beautiful creature.