ipl-logo

Was Caesar Responsible For The Collapse Of The Roman Republic?

687 Words3 Pages

Did Julius Caesar destroy the Roman Republic? By Zoe Fewtrell Introduction: Gaius Julius Caesar is a controversial figure who’s commonly held accountable for the collapse of the Roman Republic, although it remains debatable. He initiated lots of serious and long-lasting reforms that benefited Rome, yet that good was thought to be done through politically devious means for power hungry motives, leaving many differing perspectives following Caesar and if his motives were primarily why the Roman Republic fell. His complex legacy continues to be contested in our modern-day world by historians and individuals, globally. Caesar's actions were perceived as either justified or an irredeemable dictator. Body Paragraph 1: According to historians, Greg …show more content…

Strauss believes that Caesar's rise to prominence and willingness to undermine established institutions ultimately impacted the Republican system and while Woolf and Gruen state that pre-existing matters were relevant, Syme and Strauss majorly rely on Caesar’s actions and express Caesar's motives as a significant figure to whose actions caused the downfall of the Republic. His actions were perceived differently and led to the understanding that Caesar destroyed the Roman Republic. Body paragraph 3: Following this, senators believed that Caesar was to blame and needed to put an end to his dictatorship. Many disliked him, for in 44 BCE, he was announced “dictator for life” which caused an uproar in senators, as it threatened the traditional authority of the senatorial class. They saw him as an “egotistical power hungry monster” and the Senate greatly disliked him. Caesar's actions were blamed for the diminishing of the Republic as they significantly altered the political situation of Rome and did not abide by the institutions. Caesars centralised power and inability to abide by these institutions was unseen before, and was deemed disrespectful for republican

Show More
Related
1993 Words | 8 Pages

Death of the Republic 91202 James Morrissey Power in a name Julius Caesar was popular among the citizens of Rome. Caesar had gained this popularity due to his successes in war for Rome and the laws he created for the wellbeing of Rome. The reason Caesar was assassinated in 44 BC was due to declaring himself dictator for life of Rome. This is because the term dictator was considered a toxic word in Roman politics as almost all previous dictators had been tyrants in Roman history. The senators who assassinated Caesar believed that they would be celebrated for killing Caesar .

Read More
934 Words | 4 Pages

One interpretation is that Caesar’s life long dictatorship imposed in 44 BC, marked the true end of the Roman Republic. Sulla’s intentions arguably were to bring back peace and stability to Rome, Cicero explains Caesar’s to be extremely different. He writes that Caesar was a 'man who conceived a great desire to be king of the Romans and master of the entire world’.(Cicero, On Duties 3.83) This showcases how Caesar’s march on Rome and subsequent dictatorship was different from Sulla’s as his intentions were to create a long-lasting tyrannical rule. Guy Williams cites how Caesar’s rule imposed more of a threat to the Roman Republic, and that Cicero who had favoured Caesar began to resent the growing power of Caesar.

Read More
665 Words | 3 Pages

He stabilized the empire, and thus destroyed the republic. His short reign ended what was left of the republic. People contemplate whether or not he was a good leader, and if he is the main reason for the fall. In reality, the fall of the republic was inevitable. Caesar just sped it up slightly.

Read More
1273 Words | 6 Pages

Did Julius Caesar destroy the Roman Republic? By Zoe Fewtrell Introduction: Gaius Julius Caesar is generally regarded as a controversial figure who is commonly held accountable for the collapse of the Roman Republic. This perspective is highly contested, as Caesar instituted numerous substantial and long-lasting reforms that benefited Rome, yet these reforms were frequently perceived as “politically dishonest” and “power-hungry” behind his actions and ambitions, calling his legacy into question. While some view him as a significant reformer, others perceive him as an irredeemable dictator whose actions triggered the Republic's collapse. His complex legacy continues to be contested in our modern-day world by historians and individuals, globally.

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

The eventual assassination of Caesar and the subsequent power struggles marked the end of the Republic and the beginning of the transition to the Roman

Read More
913 Words | 4 Pages

Many different internal and external pressures lead to the destruction of the Roman Republic. Cornelius Sulla, a Roman general, dictator and optimate, anticipated and was aware of the results of many powerful and

Read More
774 Words | 4 Pages

Caesar was also a great ruler of Rome, he was feared by many people. A group was created to assassinate Caesar. These things happened because of the Ruler's actions that led to people's reactions. When nothing is checked in a power, the power will corrupt.

Read More
1174 Words | 5 Pages

Though the fall of the Roman Republic is largely attributed to Julius Caesar’s crossing of the Rubicon, the seeds of destruction have long been sown. 3 men in particular were especially responsible for the decline of the Republic: Sulla, Scipio Aemilianus, and Gracchus. Through their disregard for the Roman Constitution, abuses of power, and disrespect for political customs, they demonstrated and exploited the weakness of the Roman Republic, opening the door for Caesar to reap the fruits of their efforts and replace the Republic with the Roman Empire. For his egregious actions, Sulla was the most responsible of the 3 for the decline of the Republic, Scipio was the 2nd most responsible by being the first to blatantly disrespect the Republic’s

Read More
485 Words | 2 Pages

He is destroying the republic because he is taking away government and trying to replace it with a monarchy. This is important because it not right for more rome should be known as a republic. Another reason he is destroying the republic is he is trying to demand a dictatorship for life! This is a terrifying idea because if he becomes a dictator he would gain too much power and when one gets an over amount of power they start to bring the world under their hands and destroy every bit of freedom we have. Finally caesar threatened to take away our power as senators so we can’t do anything to stop him.

Read More
455 Words | 2 Pages

It is obvious that greed and corruption were the leading causes of the fall of the Roman Republic. Julius Caesar’s victorious actions against Pompey allowed him to become a dictator, one of which was considered a threat by the Senate to the possibility of becoming a tyrant. This fear eventually led to a simple and effective solution, assassinating Caesar. How did such a powerful government become a playground for cupidity and murderous solutions? In my opinion, the events involving the Gracchi Brothers were the most significant circumstances that greatly contributed to the fall of the Roman Republic.

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

It seems that the fall of the Roman Republic was not a singular event that occurred instantaneously, but rather a long process that saw the increasing use of methods outside of Republican institutions to settle conflicts between members of the aristocracy over political power. Even as the Roman government transitioned form Kingdom to Republic and then to Empire, the competition between aristocratic families remained a relative constant in across the centuries. So too has the desire to mythologize the past. The romans attributed both the fall of the Kingdom of Rome and the fall of the Roman Republic to moral rot, while a more reasonable assessment might place the blame on a dissatisfied and competitive elite class and an inefficient and unresponsive governmental system that was unwilling or unable to address their concerns. In much the same way, modern observers of the Roman Republic have tended to mythologize the fall of the Republic in the service of creating a moral narrative about the unconscionable tyranny of Cesar and the righteousness of the Senate, or whatever alternative narrative is befitting of the historical moment and audience.

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

The phrase “quality over quantity” is often used to describe many scenarios in life. When it comes to life itself, many define a good life by the amount of years lived instead of the amount of times one encountered happiness. Louis Profeta, an emergency physician, argues that it is ethically wrong to prolong a dying patient’s life trapped in a hospital bed rather than allowing the patient to feel free in a familiar setting in his article “I Know You Love Me – Now Let Me Die”. Profeta invites his readers to feel a sense of responsibility for their loved ones through his use of second person point of view. In the beginning of the article, Profeta uses a transition from a patient’s scenario of “familiar sounds, [room, and smells]” to “[y]ou see, that’s how she (the patient) used to die” (Profeta).

Read More
834 Words | 4 Pages

Individuals, such as Cassius and Brutus, in the senate were afraid of having their power decreased because Caesar, as Brutus states, is an “unhatched serpent’s egg” (Act 2, Scene 1, Line 33). Caesar has the potential of becoming a danger in the senate members point of view due to the fact that Caesar is gaining all the glory from the Plebeians and being compared to a god. Many of the Plebeians do not respect or think highly of the senate members as in Act 1, Scene 1 the cobbler uses puns and jokes to address Murellus and Flavius. Thus, Caesar was murdered out of fear and jealousy and not his rising power and therefore making his murder not

Read More
494 Words | 2 Pages

He was able to use his political savvy and military might to maneuver his way into the position of dictator, effectively ending the Roman Republic and paving the way for the Roman Empire. This breakdown of the traditional system of government and the rise of powerful individuals had several consequences. It led to increased corruption, as powerful individuals used their positions to enrich themselves at the expense of the state. It also led to social unrest, as ordinary citizens became disillusioned with the government and its inability to protect their rights and interests. Finally, it led to military expansion, as powerful individuals used their armies to conquer new territories and expand their power and influence.

Read More
1255 Words | 6 Pages

Julius Caesar was a Powerful Roman politician and general, who served as a god to the Romans. He played a key role in the events that led to the downfall of the Roman Republic and the rise of the Roman empire. His reign from 49 B.C to 44 B.C illustrated his dominance in controlling a commanding army and ruling a nation. Many historians have different opinions on Caesar's command. Some saw him as a leader for the people, whereas others saw him as a man searching for power and power alone.

Read More

More about Was Caesar Responsible For The Collapse Of The Roman Republic?

Open Document