Was Darwin Wrong David Quammen Analysis

1156 Words5 Pages

Over the eras, many scientists have expressed concerns with Darwin's evolution theory and in "Was Darwin Wrong?" by David Quammen one can learn about the proof behind the theory of evolution. Many people do not believe in evolution due to an overall unawareness about the theory and religious upbringing. However, Quammen clarifies the truth behind evolution in his article. The article states five positions of evidence biogeography, embryology, morphology, paleontology, and the bacterial resistance to antibiotics discovered in humans. In this summary of "Was Darwin Wrong?" by Quammen I will explain the evidence behind the theory of evolution and evaluate each of the five categories of evidence of evolution. Darwin proved evolution in multiple ways each of which Quammen discusses. First, to prove his position, Quammen expressed the scientific evidence behind theories their strong standing in the scientific community. Quammen does this by using examples such as the atomic theory and the theory of continental drift both of which are strong beliefs in the science community. Therefore, he expressed the strength of the theory of evolution and explained how it is more than just an idea. …show more content…

Darwin noted that small different heritable traits in animals form from their chances of survival in natural selection. Darwin also believed in agenesis, the single transformation of a species and speciation, the isolated genetic changes in a species. The splitting and specializing phenomenon was another strong principle to Darwin's discovery of Evolution. The splitting and specializing phenomenon was the idea that two species could form from one species. The amount of shared characteristics between any species specifies how soon they have evolved from a shared lineage. Overall, Darwin knew that species were transforming and evolving over