ipl-logo

Was Tiberius Gracchus Law Of Land Equal Between The Rich And Poor?

909 Words4 Pages

Land is a very controversial topic during the time of Tiberius Gracchus, especially between the rich and poor of the Roman Empire. Whereas the rich believed that in order to own land, a person must be of wealth; Tiberius Gracchus and many of the poor believed the laws for land were made to be equal between the social classes. The problem of land became a problem of conquest during the third Punic War, as Carthage was conquered by Rome and their military and tribune leader, Tiberius Gracchus (Movie). Tiberius Gracchus was an imperfect politician; he strived for equality and power. Once the land of Carthage was conquered, the poor (plebeians), had nowhere to go; the rich (aristocrats) took over the land. The plebeians had no land to live on and were forced to work for the aristocrats. Gracchus, being a proactive and thoughtful leader, changed the law of land to equalize the land to the rich and poor. This law limited the rich to 500 jurgras of land; therefore, distributing the remaining land to the plebeians for personal living and housing space (Movie). …show more content…

The rich saw the law of the land to be upsetting (Appian, 2). They couldn’t live the way they wanted as Gracchus forbid allotments (Appian, 2). Because of this, the rich formed groups to rally against Gracchus and the poor. The groups were designed get their land back, as many believed that the land from their ancestors were being taken away from the government and given to the poor. Furthermore, the poor started to over crowd the city, as it is believed from the start that the rich took their land. The plebeians grew in a lack of harmony as they waited for a tribune to be elected into the senate to serve as the plebeians voice (Movie). Not only did Tiberius Gracchus help between the disagreements between the rich, poor, and the Roman government; Gracchus also earned himself a well respected name in the eyes of

Show More
Related
199 Words | 1 Pages

I believe the plebeians were important to Rome for a few reason. The plebeians were instrumental in the war and in the army’s numbers to defend Rome for being taken by its enemies or the nearby Latium towns. Also I would think that them being the working class, that their taxes were important to the city. Plebeians could be observed as the working class or commoners who lived outside of the walls of the city (Morey, 1901).Their only rights after the abolishment of the kingship was the right to vote and the right to property/contract.

Read More
1226 Words | 5 Pages

Tiberius Gracchus was a tribune who lived in Rome in the early-mid 1st century BC. Frank Herbert, an American author commented that “The stakes in conflict do not change. Battle determines who will control the wealth or its equivalent”. The actions of Tiberius Gracchus do support the statement by Herbert as the direct challenge to the authority of the Senate he made provoked the Senate to act in an extreme way to maintain power. Tiberius Gracchus was motivated by the people and his position to introduce the reforms and by doing this he threatens the peace in the Roman society.

Read More
926 Words | 4 Pages

The Gracchi brothers, Tiberius and Gaius, had intentions of making Rome the best it could be, which contradicted the visions of the Senators. The two brothers grew up during a tough time in the Roman Empire, but they took it upon themselves to make a difference. “The Empire went through tremendous growth, through both acquisition of land, slaves, and various citizen classes.” This drastic growth ultimately led to a fall in the Roman political system. Tiberius, the older brother, founded the idea of the agrarian laws, which was later continued by his younger brother, Gaius, after his death.

Read More
1808 Words | 8 Pages

Tiberius and Gaius Gracchus, better known as the ‘Gracchi Brothers’ were a pair of tribunes descending from the plebs from the 2nd century BCE who sought to introduce land reforms and other legislations that aligned with their populist views/ideas. It can be said that the career of the two brothers was marked by murder, riots and outright manipulation of the power they were granted which completely altered the state of Roman politics- aiding in the breakdown of the Roman Republic. The legislation they sought to pass essentially redistributed major aristocratic land ownership among the commoners such as the urban poor and veterans. After achieving little success during the early stages of the reforms, both were assassinated by enemy parties.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

For example, a bill introduced by Tiberius was without consultation with the Senate, which “was not illegal, but it violated a custom of long standing.” Furthermore, upon receiving a veto by fellow tribune Marcus Octavius, Tiberius had him removed from office with his power, which was unconstitutional. Such actions on his behalf led the Senate to fear his growing alleged tyrant power which eventually led to a revolt in which Tiberius and many of his followers were killed. Similarly, Gaius Gracchus was killed along with his supporters by his political foes as a result of his agrarian reforms that were accumulating a massive public following. These events portray one of the biggest aspects of the Gracchi legacy, which was violence as a means of political resolution.

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

Documents of 1776 The Revolutionary War began as a result of gradual tensions that involved wealthy and the “common people”. The wealthy elite were in positions of power within the government due to the fact that they owned more land than other colonists did. The reason why this occurs can be summed up from a gentry man himself. According to document number two involving John Adams, he states that “power always follows property”.

Read More
558 Words | 3 Pages

These devices strike sympathy in the plebeians for Caesar, but also a strong displeasure towards Brutus. By talking about his friend’s death in a tragic way, Antony not only persuades the plebeians to side with him instead of Brutus, but he also causes the plebeians to come together in a massive horde and become a violent riot through

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Unlike the Romans, Athenians had a strict but fair schedule that allowed them to enjoy citizenship equally. Equally, hard workers have brought Athens power just as much as hereditary leaders. According to Document B all citizens should be allowed to speak their opinion and have a share in election because of the hard work they do to make the city powerful. Athenians allowed poor and common men to win a position in government which was a transition from the wealthy having power to everyone having power.

Read More
375 Words | 2 Pages

But back then they thought that the social class was bad. For example “ Social class is not allowed to interfere with someone’s merit, and poverty does not block the way”. ( document A). I think that the social class should be able to interfere the any other. That's why I think that ancient athens was truly democratic because all the people should be able to vote and own their own land.

Read More
296 Words | 2 Pages

Who was Julius Caesar was he a hero or a villain? Julius Caesar was a hero to many plebeians because he made many great accomplishments of the government , Rome, and for the poor. Some people might think he was a villain, but some people think differently. First of all, Julius Caesar did many great effects to Rome. Julius gave land to the landless, like the poor and veterans who didn’t have land before.

Read More
581 Words | 3 Pages

Chapter 17 – Freedoms Boundaries, at Home and Abroad The Populist Platform Elizabeth Beeman History 207B - 73339 Also known as the People’s Party, in 1892 The Populist Platform sought for reforms to our Nation which they saw as being on the verge of ruin, caused by political and economic inequality. Corruption in government was rampant. People were demoralized by the conditions they found themselves in. It became necessary for voting in most States to take place in protected areas where the ballot boxes would not be stuffed, voters would not be intimidated and bribery could be held at bay. Because newspapers were largely subsidized they did not favor echoing public opinion.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

In Ancient Rome, the Romans had their own Roman Republic. The Roman republic reasonably met the common good. The way they did this was that they didn’t fully meet the common good in all areas, but in other areas they did. In public service I would give the Ancient Romans an A. One of the greatest achievements in ancient time was the waterway.

Read More
710 Words | 3 Pages

When the farmers they worked for lost their lands, they were left in a much more

Read More
1512 Words | 7 Pages

The composition and the governing structure of the Roman republic was not uniform throughout its existence, but some of the fundamental elements of its government came into being in the immediate aftermath of the monarchy’s collapse. Therefore, it is unsurprising that many of these institutions were created in reaction to the monarchy and its failures, and thus were shaped by this relationship. For example, the fundamental opposition to monarchy and the rule of kings that came with the experience of the Kingdom of Rome, remained quite strong in the Roman mindset throughout the existence of the Republic and into the beginnings of the Roman Empire, and its influence can be seen throughout Roman political discourse especially in the discussion

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

People who are drug addicted can benefit greatly from spending time at a drug treatment center. The center can be just what they need to overcome their addiction and live a happier life without drugs. If you are addicted to drugs, treatment is likely a necessity as it can be hard to get off of drugs without the right treatment. What does it have to offer an addicted individual?

Read More

More about Was Tiberius Gracchus Law Of Land Equal Between The Rich And Poor?

Related Topics

Open Document