ipl-logo

A Good Argument Analysis

853 Words4 Pages

A good argument has to fulfill the Logic Condition. There are two significantly different ways for an argument to satisfy the Logic Condition, which are if the argument is valid and if the argument is strong. An argument is valid if it has the following the conditional property such as if all the premises are true, then the conclusion cannot be false. An example of valid argument: 1. All ladies are teachers. 2. Suzy is a lady. Therefore, Suzy is a teacher. From the example given above, we know that the first premise is false because not all ladies are teachers. However, the argument is still considered valid. It is because if the premises were true, it would be impossible for the conclusion to be false. In other words, in a hypothetical …show more content…

However, an invalid argument can be classified into strong and weak. A strong argument is an argument that usually can be supported by facts and reasoning. The premises of a strong argument usually are plausible and relevant to the conclusion. It is rarely happens that the premise is true but the conclusion is false. For a strong argument, it gives us some pretty good reasons to believe the …show more content…

Every weak argument is bad because an argument that contains false premises is never considered a good one. The premise and the conclusion of a weak argument are usually not related. Moreover, a weak argument does not give us any information about the conclusion whether it is true or false. Therefore, we have no reason to believe or disbelieve the conclusion that we previously had when we are encountering a weak argument. Here are some examples for strong argument and weak argument. Example 1 All of the Year 3 students from SJKC Min Hui visited the museum last Saturday. Lily is a Year 3 students from SJKC Min Hui. Therefore , she visited the museum last Saturday. This is a strong argument because the conclusion is proven by the premise. Example 2 Johan is a teacher. Therefore, Johan doesn’t swim. This is a weak argument because it does not prove the conclusion is true or false and the premise is unrelated to the conclusion. In conclusion, a strong argument is more credible than a weak argument. In most of the situations, a strong argument is more preferred than a weak

Show More
Related
275 Words | 2 Pages

Logical fallacies happen when we draw improper conclusion from evidence or we reduce the evidence that we do have. Heinrichs explained when examples do not hold up by being in the correct category it is considered a sin. Heinrichs describes bad proof

Read More
122 Words | 1 Pages

In conclusion, both of these examples strongly support the main idea

Read More
892 Words | 4 Pages

The author will usually rely on his examples to prove is arguments. He does not explain the claims he makes, which decrease the strength of his arguments. For example, he mentions that a high-five is “not the mutual appreciation of achievement, but the feeling we get upon the achievement of mutual appreciation”. This statement is arguable, some people perform the high-five to actually show appreciation of achievement rather than of trying. The author does not signify whatsoever why the high-five does not mean “job well-done”.

Read More
476 Words | 2 Pages

There statements divides the argument by fallacies, brief reviews set of numbers, critical thinking, analyzing arguments, proposition, mathematics politics, and truth

Read More
679 Words | 3 Pages

According to OWL, also known as Online Writing Lab, “a good argument will generally use a combination of all three appeals to make its case”. Since, her logos

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

The argument must be fueled by logical claims and assisted by emotional appeal. Lastly, an argument must provide a rational and simple solution to the spat. Weak arguments

Read More
835 Words | 4 Pages

Whitman uses two kinds of proofs in order to persuade his audience. Firstly, whitman uses a proof known as Examples: “For example, X and Y demonstrate that Z happens.” Whitman implements this proof by first making the claim, “America led the world in race-based law making…(Whitman para. 3 ).” Whitman then supports this claim by providing an example of

Read More
828 Words | 4 Pages

I believe the speaker used a logical

Read More
520 Words | 3 Pages

In regards to Hart and Daughton, the role of analysis in rhetorical criticism plays an important role in a variety of ways. From persuasion, to structure and form, to syntax, each showcases a significant faction of analysis in rhetorical criticism. Persuasion, relates to several differential logic forms – human and informal, which tie together arguments considered thin, and those considered higher in class. In analyzing, persuasively, it is important that an individual does not immediately classify a reasoning put forth by a rhetor, to be not credible. This is due to the assumptions, or biases people bring with them in daily life; such as, the idea that people have reasons for doing what they do, and the idea that persuasion is generally credible.

Read More
590 Words | 3 Pages

Overall, her argument was unsupported, and it lacked logical

Read More
121 Words | 1 Pages

Unit 2: EA2 Argumentative Essay Reflection What I feel I did well on this argumentative essay was my research. I had many sources that provided me with facts and statistics and they helped me to decide what side I was on. There were many sources that I did not use but that I had read through. What I struggled with was commentary.

Read More
678 Words | 3 Pages

Her argument is made effective, additionally, by her use of

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

The reason why i thought it was a better argument he/she stated better information than the other

Read More
1783 Words | 8 Pages

Fallacies are mostly used in the beginning when they are developing their argument. This is used extensively by those who initially started by saying that the young boy is guilty. Most of the jurors who initially say that the boy is guilty, use inductive reasoning to prove that what they are saying is correct, whether it makes sense or not, or if it has logic incorporated into their reasoning and conclusion that they were trying to present. On the other hand, the man who says from the start that the boy could be innocent used mostly deductive reasoning to prove his points. He wants to make sure that the logic he is providing or the inductive reasoning he is trying to prove right or wrong, is based on logic rather than speculation.

Read More
986 Words | 4 Pages

A fallacy is defined as a mistake in an argument that arises from defective reasoning or the creation of an illusion that makes a bad argument appear good. In layman terms, Dictionary.com defines a fallacy as a deceptive, misleading or false notion, belief, etc. It is a misleading or unsound argument. Both inductive and deductive arguments may contain fallacies and if they do, they are usually uncogent or unsound. Fallacies are divided into two groups which are formal fallacy and informal fallacy.

Read More

More about A Good Argument Analysis

Open Document