ipl-logo

Welfare And Arguments Of Welfare

954 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Food stamps being abused essay

There have been countless debates and arguments concerning welfare over past years. Many consider welfare a bad way to help people, but others believe it has helped society to advance and grow. Welfare provides financial stability to the poor and also allows one live. They come in different appearances with the most common one being the food stamp. Food stamps allow families to get the food they need. Many families depend on welfare to be able to support their families. Without it, families would fall into a state of great poverty in which they would not be able to do anything to get back on their feet. But that is why welfare exists. Welfare acts as a precautionary measure for families so they do not have to become dirt poor. To support these …show more content…

People cannot live without food or water. However, welfare has allowed some people to have access to food and water. The income that people get from welfare allows them to live by letting them have the money to be able to eat and drink. The income also helps people to get clothing for the cold winters, so they do not freeze to death. Income is very important to everyone trying to live. In this world, money is basically everything. Without money, one cannot do anything. But with the small bit of income that welfare provides for one, they could use that to try to get back on their feet (Virginia). Another reason why welfare is good is that it can provide healthcare to families. Medicaid is the form that welfare exists in to help people in providing medical needs for their families. Everyone is vulnerable to getting sick or hurt. When people get sick or hurt, they go to the doctor’s office or the hospital. However, some families cannot do that because they do not have the money to afford it. But with welfare, they could get the help they need. Society would be much healthier too since sick people would not be walking around the streets and in buildings …show more content…

Welfare has decreased the percentage of people in poverty by a significant amount and will continue to do so (NCPA). Without welfare, many people would be in desperate need of money and could start doing illegal stuff just to get what they need. People wouldn’t be able to get medical needs to help themselves. Everyone would get sick because sick people would be walking around town and in buildings. Children would get hungry and some might even not be able to go to school. People would die left and right from starvation or from the cold. Therefore, welfare should not be removed but should be improved to help the lives of the poor. The poor needs to be helped even if they don’t have the money. Many people depend on it to live and many others will need it to live in the

Show More
Related
648 Words | 3 Pages

The idea of welfare might represent that there is always a way to make things work, even when times are tough. The idea that we can overcome difficult circumstances and achieve success

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

The Welfare Reform Act of 1996 was a landmark legislation that drastically altered how the U.S. government approached poverty. Passed during Bill Clinton's presidency, the reform aimed to decrease the dependency on state support by promoting self-reliance and employment among the populace. This initiative gave birth to the Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) program. However, despite the seemingly positive intentions, the Act arguably created a plethora of issues. In fact, many have criticized the reform for its unrealistic assumptions about the reality of poverty in America.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

Welfare State is a program of government programs that transfer money and services to Canadians. This Welfare State program began in 1938, right before the start of World War 2. This Welfare State program helped millions of Canadians with problems such as poverty, homelessness, unemployment, aging, illness, workplace injury, disability, and the needs of children, women, gay, lesbian, and transgendered people (Moscovitch, 2006). Obviously having all of these problems was not a good thing for Canadians, but the government found a way to help their citizens. The Welfare State program was a significant improvement because many Canadian citizens benefitted from this.

Read More
907 Words | 4 Pages

The term “welfare” generally has a negative connotation when being discussed because it represents lack of resources. Many people think that it’s recipients may be “milking the system” or “lazy” and don’t want to go out and earn their living however, welfare can and should be used as a positive asset to society. However, it tends to be used as a crutch for longer than appropriate but, after conducting in depth research it has become obvious that this is rarely the recipients defect. The government creates these programs that are designed to help those in need and they generally do for some amount of time. But when an individual strives to obtain a higher paying job, it doesn’t even have to be much of a pay increase, they are at risk of losing for example, their rent assistance.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

It is obvious that only the kids want welfare but, why is that? Rose Mary states, “Once you go on welfare, it changes you. Even if you get off welfare, you never escape the stigma that you were a charity case” (188). This statement from her tells the reader her why to not accepting welfare. In this sense welfare is symbolizing negativity and disservice to the family.

Read More
1102 Words | 5 Pages

That is not what welfare should be used for though, it should be used as an extra last resort support system for an individual until they can get back on their feet. This is why there are so many people on the street and in homeless shelters, because the government is giving them free money. This is why it should in the end be up to private organizations and charity. This is because if it is a small group of people working with the less fortunate they can get to know them individually and try to help them off of welfare or the support that they are getting. Granted there are some things that the less fortunate should have the opportunity to have and that is health care.

Read More
1041 Words | 5 Pages

While some insist the Welfare programs help families in need. They imply without such programs a person would not be able to support themselves nor their children. Both sides have a valid argument and both sides

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

A welfare state insures social, educational, and economical equality among all Regardless of the cost to society. With having your standard of living dependent on your government you forfeit a portion of your personal liberties and with it go ones ambitions and most importantly the will to improve your surroundings and better your community for future generations. Therefore, the community would benefit from less government regulations. Dr. Dalrymple offers logical, although contradictory arguments to explain the cycle of evil but not any clear ideas on how to stop the cycle of evil and improve these circumstances for future generations. Unfortunately , I believe the

Read More
333 Words | 2 Pages

If there were no welfare state then we could have freeflow of people across the border. You could work, leave, follow the work. There wouldn 't be a net loss in terms of the tax dollar. You would not be paying taxes then taking benefits.

Read More
1288 Words | 6 Pages

Today many women work, so welfare reformers adopt this value into welfare programs. Requiring welfare recipients to work for benefits gives people hope and opportunity, and gives them a chance to work. Everybody can do something and should be expected to do something, even if it is menial work, in order to get their pay, so that there’s a connection to the state sending them money to be able to do something to earn that money. The public wants welfare recipients, who are able to work, to take jobs, and the public wants welfare recipients who can’t find jobs to work at jobs that the state provides in welfare-to-work programs, and require everybody to do something for their pay. The biggest problem with requiring welfare recipients to work is there’s no new money for job placement, employment education, and job training.

Read More
1265 Words | 6 Pages

No Test, No Check Ronald Reagan said, “We should measure welfare’s success by how many people leave, not by how many are added.” People should find a way not to rely on the government for assistance unless it is truly needed. Welfare is defined as a program designed to help those in financial need or the unemployed by distributing goods or money. Welfare is made for those who need assistance for a short amount of time and is not meant to be long term. It is a privilege for those who are not financially stable enough to support themselves or their families.

Read More
824 Words | 4 Pages

Conrad, Calvin, and Beth make up the Jarrett family. Beth is the mother, Calvin, the father, and Conrad, their remaining son. Buck, their other son, was killed before the novel took place in a boating accident. The dysfunction begins at the beginning of the novel, which takes place a year or so after Buck is killed. AMPP would have been very useful for the family, especially the mother.

Read More
641 Words | 3 Pages

Over 35.4 percent of the United States is registered for welfare. An average family of four, that receives money from the government, can expect as least $500 in food stamps, and at least another $1,500 for whatever else, and top it all off, the government pays all bills and also for any medical visits for the family. So

Read More
579 Words | 3 Pages

According to statisticsbrain.com, their are 110,489,000 Americans who are on welfare and more and more Americans are applying for welfare each year. Many Americans rely on welfare for their families and for individual needs. Welfare recipients should not be permitted to take a drug test because drug testing is expensive for states and the country, drug testing is unconstitutional and welfare recipients do not do drugs any more than people who do not receive welfare. Drug testing is expensive and cost states a lot of money one drug test cost averages to about 42 dollars, not including the cost for equipment and hiring people to conduct the test. States start programs that require welfare recipients to take a drug test and the programs end up costing them up to 1 million or, even more, depending on the number of welfare recipients that reside in that state.

Read More
153 Words | 1 Pages

Capitalist argument Capitalism allows the producer to contain his own material to sell, thus earning a profit. Those that have private owned stores are able to change the price to benefit the consumer, however socialist can not. Socialist producers follow the government or communities orders, like if the price goes up or down. For example the gas station's gas price is the same no matter where you go. This affects competition because if the gas is the same everywhere than there's no competition, however, if a capitalist gas station opened up then the price would be lower than the socialist gas.

Read More

More about Welfare And Arguments Of Welfare

Related Topics

Open Document