ipl-logo

Were The Boston Colonists Justified Questions And Answers

1031 Words5 Pages

During late 18th century America, there was much debate regarding the topic of the where the American colonies stood: with Britain, or separate from them. The British crown with parliament continuously imposed taxes upon the colonies and with each tax imposed the colonists grew increasingly angrier. However, there still was the debate that the British were justified as well for the taxes they imposed since they had supported the colonies in the French-Indian war. While the British did have, a good argument regarding with their justification the colonies were justified in their actions of separating from the crown. The colonies were justified in their actions to rebel against the crown was since a vast amount of various taxes was imposed upon …show more content…

For example, in the Boston Massacre, the citizens of the colonies were outraged by this event and felt insecure by those who ruled them because now the British were now sending soldiers to kill them. From The picture that can be seen in Document 4, it displays a scene in which the British soldiers are firing upon the Boston colonists- essentially the Boston Massacre. The colonists are represented as defenseless and within the picture, and to see that the crown's soldiers attacking them at random, it can be examined as an act of tyranny. It is one of these reasons that the colonists were justified when they rebelled. Another example why the colonists were justified in their actions to rebel against the English “tyrant” was due the quartering act. This act was an example of how the King of England abused his power by forcing his subjects in the colonists to house and take care of the soldiers he had stationed there (Document 9). Due to these reasons the colonists by-factor would have been arranged in the king’s attempt to assuage upon his housing problem by weight of the issue upon the colonists. Essentially he was taking advantage of their kindness. Another reason why the colonists were justified in their attempt to rebel against the English monarch is because they sought to rid themselves of a monarch who only sought absolute power. Essentially, they wanted to seek what was best for themselves compared to the treatment they had obtained from the crown. They wanted the rights to life, liberty and property, as cited in John Locke’s writings (Document 8). The colonies were justified when it came out their rebellion due to the various taxes that did not allow them to have representation for each of them as well as the various attacks the soldiers had upon the people, but in some cases the British crown can

Show More
Related
318 Words | 2 Pages

The colonists had one interest. They wanted to be treated fairly. However, they believed the new laws were unfair, so they took action. The colonists resisted and wanted to be free because they thought the British weren’t treating them the way they should be treated.

Read More
756 Words | 4 Pages

“Highly burdened by taxes themselves, the British were merely asking the colonies to bear the expense of their own administration and defense.” So, Britain needed money because they were helping them out but when they asked for it, the colonists protested. By doing this they were hurting Britain. Overall, they didn’t show any respect towards the King who had helped them out when they needed

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

Introduction In the late 1700s, the British government taxed the American colonists. Many might ask if it was a substantial decision to tax the American Colonists as a way to make money. Taxing the American Colonists led to many events that would not benefit the British. The taxation of the American Colonists was not a prudent decision on Britain’s behalf.

Read More
1236 Words | 5 Pages

The final reason the colonists were unjustified was that they were the only reason Britain had treated them so poorly. As a result of the French and Indian War - which was fought for the colonists - the Stamp Act of 1765 and the Townshend Act of 1767 were used to pay for war efforts. Also, the Proclamation of 1763, which forced colonists to live east of the Application Mountains, protected the colonists from the Indians and prevented future conflicts between them. The Intolerable Acts of 1774 would not have existed if not for the Boston Tea Party - in which the colonists dumped about 1 million dollars worth of tea into the Boston Harbor: it only existed to demonstrate Britain’s power over the colonists. Finally, the Boston Massacre would have

Read More
722 Words | 3 Pages

The answer is that they were correct in their choice, and even justified in it. Although the British did have a debt to pay because of the French and Indian War, Britain still plunged the colonists into heavy taxes. First, the British forced many ridicules acts on the colonists, one of them being: the “Stamp Act” which forced the colonists to pay extra money for simple playing cards and newspapers. In addition, the “Sugar Act” was placed which had the colonists pay “duty”.

Read More
1558 Words | 7 Pages

Between 1763 and 1775, there were three ‘Imperial Crises’ which occurred between the British and the American colonists. The conflict that was produced during this period arose through an undefined balance of political and economic power between the two parties. In 1763, Britain had just concluded the French and Indian war and was left with an immense and almost crippling debt of around 140 million pounds sterling (“Turning Point In American History”). In Britain’s eyes, the most effective way to reduce this debt was increased taxes. Unfortunately, the people of England were already massively overtaxed, which meant the last option for the British was to tax the American colonists.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

The Boston tea party of 1773, to reduce tensions in the colonies, parliament repealed almost all of the Townshend acts. However it kept the tax on tea, British officials knew that the colonial demand for the tea was high despite the boycott . But colonial merchants were smuggling most of this imported tea and paying on duty.. 2 The Townshend act in June 1716 parliament passed the Townshend act.

Read More
714 Words | 3 Pages

They believed they had the right to “assemble, consider their grievances, and petition the king” if they found the grievances against the British to be many (Document 6). The colonists must have risked their lives, money, and pride in order to achieve equal representation and total liberty rather than just attaining lower taxes and lowering trading restrictions. Even before the American Revolution, the colonies had viewed themselves as self governing. However, once the British ended the salutary neglect the colonists had blissfully enjoyed, it became clear that the British were beginning to restrict their local representations by shutting down their town meetings and placing soldiers everywhere as an attempt to stop the smuggling of goods and to enforce their taxation acts by issuing the Quartering act, which obligated the colonists to house the British soldiers. As a result of these new acts imposed by the parliament, nine colonies sent out a representative to New York in 1765 to discuss these acts with each other.

Read More
656 Words | 3 Pages

The French and Indian War was important to the American Revolution because the debt from the war was the reason that Parliament started taxing the colonists. Also, the French and Indian War made Britain very weak, making the colonists’ actions work a whole lot better. Since France was not happy with the outcome of their war with Britain this was a main reasons for France’s interest in helping the now Americans throughout the Revolutionary War, which was very important to the colonies’ victory. ​The reason why Britain started to tax the colonists was because of the debt resulting from the French and Indian War. The first tax was the the tax on sugar, which was put on the colonists to help pay off the war debt.

Read More
779 Words | 4 Pages

In debate Darla Davis discusses the Taxes imposed on the American Colonists by Parliament. First not everyone in parliament believe that taxation of the colonies was right thing to do. According to Darla’s Article, Will Pitt and Edmund Burke, were two members of the parliament that under stood why the colonist were opposing the tax. Colonist were opposing men felt that the opposition from the colonists concerning the taxes existed, because the colonist had been practically ignored by England since having been established.

Read More
426 Words | 2 Pages

During the Colonial Era (1492-1763), colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain; due to the inequitable Stamp Act, the insufferable British oppression, and the perceived tyranny of King George III, the king of Great Britain, however, the colonists were unjustified in some of their actions. In Colonial America, colonists were justified in waging war against Great Britain, because the Stamp Act was unfair and viewed as punishment. Because of the war, Britain had no other choice but to tax the colonists to pay for the debt. For example, according to document 2, the author states that the act was not only for trade but for “the single purpose of levying money.”

Read More
448 Words | 2 Pages

Lastly it was unncesary for the British to tax the colonists. These are enough reasons to cause the colonists to break away from England and become their own independent

Read More
580 Words | 3 Pages

The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Although, in the same respect the English saw the failure of mercantilism and cost of war as reason enough to take action and create tariffs to create much needed funds. Regardless, of the reasoning behind the tariffs the colonists didn’t think they represented their best interest and felt they weren’t getting proper representation in British Parliament. This is when the famous saying, ”no taxation without representation” became an extremely popular chant embodying colonies animosity towards the the levying of unwanted taxes. Parliament saw the colonies as being spoiled which is a fair accusation considering their economy was built off smuggling and definitely had some control in their decision making. One must not forget the impact of the Salutary neglect and it’s contribution to leading americans on the road to

Read More
329 Words | 2 Pages

Britain was forcing the colonists to house the British soldiers and there was no compensation. The British government also violated the colonist’s rights by restricting trade by preventing other nations from purchasing products form the North American colonial market. Obviously, the Founding Fathers were justified in rebelling because the British government was taking advantage of the colonists. Parliament applied various taxes, and forced the colonists to house British soldiers which violated the rights of the colonists.

Read More

More about Were The Boston Colonists Justified Questions And Answers

Open Document