There was not always a problem between the colonists and Britain. At one point the colonists were somewhat independent. After the British set up the Navigation Acts, which made the colonists not able to trade with anyone else without it going through Britain, first there was something called salutary neglect. Salutary neglect was an English policy of relaxing the rules on its colonies. During this time the colonies remained loyal to Britain. But, after this Britain went of control with power. They set up many unfair taxes and made the colonists like slaves to them. So yes, the colonists were justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain because they made unfair taxes or acts and they had too much power over the colonists. After the French and Indian war Britain was left with a lot of debt. To pay off the debt from the war …show more content…
The British became tyrants and did things just because they were able to. Britain had “an absolute Tyranny over these states.” (Document 7), it is saying that Britain had complete control over everyone and everything. The British treated all of the colonists like slaves and made the colonists do whatever Britain wanted the people to do. Like when Britain issued the Quartering acts, Britain made the colonists give up their homes and jobs just so the soldiers had a bed, food and money. The colonists had no one to tell Britain that the acts and taxes and what they were doing was unfair. In Document 5 it says, “What is to defend [the colonists] against so enormous, so unlimited power?” Meaning that the colonists had no one to speak out for them. Britain didn 't make the acts/taxes to pay off the debt from the war; Britain did it to show the colonists “whose boss. ” The British knew how much power they had and what they were able to do with it. Britain set up the unfair taxes because they wanted to and were able to do
After seven years of the fighting the French and Indian War, tensions had grown between Britain and its American colonies. In response to the substantial debt Britain was burdened with after the war, they began taxing the colonist with the intent of recuperating their losses. The colonist, who had not been given representation in the British parliament, felt the taxes were unfair. After more than a decade of increased restrictions and taxes, the prominent members of the colonial society were left with a decision to make: pay the taxes willingly or prepare for war ("Patrick Henry’s Speeches"). Although many colonists believed action against the British was necessary, only a few were willing to voice their opinions.
However, the British Government was in serious debt at the time of its extreme taxing of the colonists. National debt doubled from £75 million in 1754 to £133 million in 1763, as money to finance the war was borrowed heavily from British and Dutch bankers. (website about taxes) Because of this enormous debt, the British needed to make up for it by setting new taxes into affect. It is arguable that the debt was in part a burden of the colonists ' as the war ended to their advantage, and was undertaken upon their account. It is also debatable whether or not the colonies were obligated to help out their mother country in this way.
In our Social Studies book it states that the British kept making acts to put the colonists in line. The British made acts like the Quartering Act , (where British soldiers invaded colonists home and forced them to serve them) colonists barely had enough money to support their family and then the British enforce this law. Don’t even get me started on the Counting Act where King George III just had to come in and make some act just so he can put colonists in line. I mean I get that King George III had to pay for the French and Indian war but that just made the colonists angry so then they started to rebel and and then the King made more acts to wallop the
"Those who want to reap the benefits of this great nation must bear the fatigue of supporting it" (Thomas Paine). This quote relates to the struggles that the British had to endure while finding solutions for their many dilemmas. In order for the British to have full advantage over the colonial nation, they had to overcome these issues. They figured that they could press the American colonists to help share this burden, which would not only be a solution for their problems, but would also increase their power throughout the country. Therefore, the British desired to tax the American colonists due to the financial consequences of the French and Indian war, to demonstrate sovereignty, and for defense against the French.
For many years, historians reflected on such that has pondered us all, what started the revolution? The kickoff of the revolution varies between economics, and politics, even though some may believe it is undecidable. The colonists endeavored independance with a bit of work along the way, defeating the kings way of ruling and making it better for themselves. Although the prohibition of trade between other countries by the the king contributed to the feelings of melancholy and anger to the colonists, possibly starting the revolution, it was strongly precipitated due to the conflict of politics between the king and the colonists.
“Were the American colonist justified in waging war and breaking away from Britain?” There comes a time in history when a nation needs to break the bands that hold them down from becoming a great nation. In this case, the colonists had the right to break the bonds from the British Empire in the 1700s. About one hundred colonists left Europe to seek religious freedom and make the unknown their new home. As the colonist moved into their new homes in America, the British wanted to make some money from their new colonies in America.
(Document A) Overall, this shows how England was being a bad government and didn’t do their job correctly for citizens, which leads the colonists to be unhappy and revolt, so the colonists deserved,are justified, to be able to fight, or revolt, for a better life and government which they all fought for and deserved greatly. Using their bad governmenting skills is a valid way to show how the colonists’ wanting a better government and revolting was the right thing to
Neither the Revolutionaries nor Loyalists were particularly innocent in the Revolutionary War. The war, however, was only a facade. Only a small portion of the population of the Thirteen Colonies truly supported independence. Most colonists merely supported better representation in Parliament, were Loyalist, or simply refrained from opinion. The real reasons why the colonies seceded were because of the Boston Massacre, new taxes, and the Proclamation of 1763.
The act of taking land was an example of excessive force and the British taking their power as an advantage. That was not the correct way Great Britain should have punished the colonies if they really wanted to, which they did. To cap it off, page 151 of the textbook, explains, “The Boston Tea Party outraged the British government.” The British were furious of what had happened, which sparked the Intolerable Acts, because they thought the colonists had known to respect their other taxing. However, the colonists had no way to express their opinions and feelings about the British taxes, and they only way was to take action and make the British feel how the colonists had been feeling.
I believe that the colonists were justified in revolting against the government. The actions they took were extremely upsetting. The Proclamation of 1763. Doesn’t sound too bad, does it?
“The duty of a true patriot is to protect his country from it government.” We the people are upset with Britain due to British taxing us unfairly, and the British troops whom are invading our homes therefore we will take matter into our own hands! We the people shall take matter into our own hands. Without a doubt we shall break away from Britain. The time is now to declare independence for these reasons Representation in Parliament, Tyrannical Actions, and Success without Britain.
The American Revolution was, to date, the best event to happen on American soil, providing freedom and representation in government to the individuals who fought so hard for it. France and Spain aided our cause, helping this group of brave colonists to defeat the strongest army in the world. But, there is a question still not answered; were the colonists justified in breaking away from Britain? The American colonists were justified in breaking away from the British because there was taxation without representation, they had no freedom, and the British government violated their individual British rights. I believe the American colonists were justified for breaking away from Britain because there was taxation without representation.
The colonists wanted representation when it came down to being taxed, but the British government would not allow it. The government wanted full control over the people, so they made sets of acts and laws that were placed on taxation. For example, the Stamp Acts of 1765. These acts taxed all papers, pamphlets, newspapers, and cards. The Townshend Acts of 1767 were also a large part of taxation.
Because of the great amount of power Britain possessed, the colonists were under oppression, ultimately taking action to defend themselves. Namely, according to document 5, the author states, “what is to defend us against so enormous, so unlimited power?”. As the taxes began to mound on top of one over the other, the colonists began to feel overwhelmed. In response, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin, and three others, created the Declaration of Independence as a call to war, to offset British rule. Like the Stamp Act, the colonists answered with violence, and the violence only increased as the British made sure to oppress the
One reason the American Revolution was avoidable was Britain could have been fair to the colonists. As shown in the Legislation Bank, the colonists were victim to many different