The Tragedy of Julius Caesar tells the story of Marcus Brutus’ struggle between the conflicting demands of honor, patriotism and loyalty. In the play, Brutus is the quintessential model of what a Roman man should be. He is both well-respected and honorable, and as men with such qualities do, holds himself to the highest standard. This is evidenced by his actions throughout the play, in which he only does what he believes to be the right thing for Rome. His decision to join and later lead the conspiracy against Julius Caesar is not one made out of malice, but rather out of love. This contrasts sharply with the other conspirators’ motives for joining the conspiracy; for example, Cassius is deeply resentful and envious of Caesar, and he allows these emotions to …show more content…
His words directed at Cassius in Act I, Scene 2, “Into what dangers would you lead me, Cassius, that you would have me seek into myself for that which is not in me?”, reflect his understanding that the plot is one that will go against his principles. In Act II, Scene 1, however, Brutus begins fashioning his case for Caesar’s death. He laments about Caesar’s impending coronation and uses metaphors that compare Caesar to a “serpent’s egg” as a means to convince himself that Caesar is dangerous. He is certain that Caesar cannot be crowned king, for his monarchy would rob the Romans of their liberties. What further solidifies this belief in his mind are the letters that he has received, purportedly written by Roman citizens begging him to save them from Caesar’s rule. These letters trigger Brutus’ sense of duty to Rome, reinforcing his philosophy to serve the greater good. This feeling of public responsibility to prevent Caesar’s ambition from undermining the Roman Republic is ultimately what convinces Brutus that he is acting honorably (Core