ipl-logo

What Are The Good Guards In The Stanford Prison Experiment

1092 Words5 Pages

Stanford Prison Experiment
What prevented "good” guards from objecting to the orders from tough/bad guards? Give 3 possible reasons.
The "good" guards may have succumbed to the pressure of conforming to the roles and expectations associated with being a guard. The simulated prison environment created a social dynamic where the guards were expected to assert authority and maintain control. The "good" guards may have felt compelled to align their behavior with the prevailing norms and expectations, even if it meant following the orders of the tough or bad guards. The guards' behavior in the Stanford Prison Experiment could have been influenced by a diffusion of responsibility. When individuals are part of a group or system, they may feel less …show more content…

How do you think the prisoners felt?
The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted over a relatively short period of time (six days) and ended abruptly due to ethical concerns when the guards saw each other in civilian clothes again and witnessed the reconversion of the prison setting to a regular hallway, they might have experienced a sense of relief and disorientation. They would likely realize that the intense power dynamics and the authority they held during the experiment were no longer applicable. Some guards might have felt a release of the pressure associated with their roles, possibly feeling a mix of guilt, self-reflection, or confusion about their behavior during the study. They may have also experienced a shift in their perception of their fellow guards, as the dynamics and roles that shaped their interactions were suddenly stripped away. The prisoners, upon seeing the reconversion of the prison into a hallway and the guards in civilian clothes, might have felt a sense of freedom and relief. They would likely recognize that the harsh and dehumanizing environment they were subjected to during the experiment was over. The prisoners might experience a range of emotions, such as resentment, anger, or confusion, as they process their treatment and the psychological impact of the role they were forced …show more content…

Was it right to trade the suffering experienced by participants for the knowledge gained by the research? Why or why not? (The experimenters did not take this issue lightly, although the Slide Show may sound somewhat matter-of-fact about the events and experiences that

Show More
Related
842 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was a social psychology study that aimed to investigate the effects of power and authority on human behavior. In the experiment, participants were randomly assigned roles as prisoners or guards in a simulated prison environment. The results of the experiment showed that the participants' behavior was heavily influenced by their role and the power dynamics at play. The guards became increasingly authoritarian and abusive, while the prisoners became submissive and

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

In Kyle Patrick Alvarez’s The Stanford Prison Experiment, 20 college aged boys are selected to play different roles in a simulated prison located within Stanford. This experiment was thought of and carried out by Philip Zimbardo, a professor of psychology. The boys, who were also students at Stanford, were randomly selected to be a guard or a prisoner. The prisoners were taken by real police officers to the Stanford jail. When the experiment started, most of the prisoners thought of the situation as it was intended to be, an experiment.

Read More
444 Words | 2 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment (SPE) had a main goal to find out how much of an influence a specific setting location could have on how individuals behave. The experiment took place in 1971 and many psychologists used as a reference to analyze people’s mind under certain circumstance. Young individuals were given the roles of prisoner and guard in prison-like setting located at the Psychology department Stanford University. I strongly believe that this experiment was ethically wrong and did not surprise me at all, since the participant in the study were not fully aware of how dangerous the experiment could turn. Furthermore, the guards were acting like real inmate’s officers

Read More
751 Words | 4 Pages

In 1971, Philip Zimbardo set out to conduct an experiment to observe behavior as well as obedience. In Philip Zimbardo’s Stanford Prison experiment, many dispute whether it was obedience or merely conforming to their predesigned social roles of guards and prisoners that transpired throughout the experiment. Initially, the experiment was meant to test the roles people play in prison environment; Zimbardo was interested in finding out whether the brutality reported among guards in American prisons was due to the sadistic personalities of the guards, disposition, or had more to do with the prison environment. This phenomenon has been arguably known to possibly influencing the catastrophic similarities which occurred at Abu Ghraib prison in 2003.The

Read More
347 Words | 2 Pages

Second, The Stanford Prison Experiment was a psychological study that was too inhumane to continue because of the behavior of the prison guards when handed with superiority and the mental breakdowns of the prisoners. E: “Now, you 'll all be given sunglasses and uniforms to give the prisoners a sense of a unified, singular authority… And from this point forward you should never refer to this as a study or experiment again,’’ (Dr. Phil Zimbardo).

Read More
1676 Words | 7 Pages

After the experiment, the students who played the guards were interviewed and found to still be shocked by their behavior within the fake prison environment, unrecognising that side of them or that they were even capable of doing such evil and abusive

Read More
810 Words | 4 Pages

The guards were instructed to maintain order anyway they wanted without using physical violence. Zimbardo wanted the guards to seem intimidating while the prisoners were made to look inferior and were to be referred to with their ID number only. After the prisoners were assigned their roles and the guards took their post was the effect of the experiment finally setting in. On the morning of the second day the prisoners began to rebel against the guards by ripping off their ID numbers and barring the doors while taunting the guards. This event was the first step down the slippery slope that would follow.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment is one of the most infamous and controversial psychological experiments to ever take place to this day. In 1971, Phillip Zimbardo created an experiment that tested the changes one endures when they have to adapt in a prison environment and provided an explanation for the dehumanizing effects of the penile system. 24, college-aged, men were chosen to participate in the 2 week long experiment by flipping a coin to decide whether they’re given the role of prisoner or guard. After their roles were determined, they were given uniforms, cells, identification numbers, etc. Little did he know that the results of this experiment would give some of the most ethically challenged results of time.

Read More
876 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford Prison Experiment was conducted by Phillip Zimbardo at Stanford University in 1971 and was funded by the US Naval Office. The experiment consisted of 24 volunteer college students who were paid $15 a day to serve as guards and prisoners in a simulated prison environment. Prior to the experiment, each volunteer was given a diagnostic interview to eliminate anyone with “psychological problems, medical disabilities, or a history of crime or drug abuse.” The experiment “was intended to measure the effect of role-playing, labeling, and social expectations on behavior over a period of two weeks,” but Zimbardo ended it after six days due to abuse by the guards and the psychological wellbeing of the prisoners. By the second day of the experiment, Zimbardo already noticed behavioral changes in both the guards and prisoners.

Read More
1154 Words | 5 Pages

The only way for the teacher to end the experiment was to clearly disobey the orders of the experimenter (Milgram 579). One would think that most of, if not all, people would end the experiment immediately after the learner had any inkling of distress, but that was not the case. Instead, the teacher continued the torment so they could feel that sense of satisfaction that comes with following

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

The Stanford jail experiment, which was carried out in 1971 by Phillip Zimbardo, was designed to examine the function of power in a prison environment. In a mock jail setting, subjects were randomly assigned to the roles of "prisoners" and "guards." The experiment was intended to run for two weeks but was discontinued after six days. In the Stanford experiment, a few ethical principles were not adhered to.

Read More
858 Words | 4 Pages

This connects to the idea of guards having the capability of turning evil through an atmosphere of the prison environment where they can turn evil and have no remorse feelings towards the prisoners. From the article, "Stanford Prison Experiment," by Saul McLeod, he explained that the evil tactics that were made by the guards were from the atmosphere of the prison environment because the norm for a prison guard is to act tough and have no remorse feelings towards the prisoners when assigning punishments. He also added that guards acted this way because they lost their sense of personal identity when they dressed up as a guard, which can show they may have believed that they were actual guards and the experiment was real, which might’ve triggered their dark side with harsh punishments. Therefore, losing their personal identity in a prison environment may have been the factor where they triggered their evil side during the prison

Read More
599 Words | 3 Pages

Stanford Prison Experiment Philip Zimbardo questioned, “What happens when you put good people in an evil place? Does humanity win over evil, or does evil triumph?” (Zimbardo, 1971) In 1971 a psychologist named Philip Zimbardo conducted an experiment on the effects prison has on young males with the help of his colleague Stanley Milgram. They wanted to find out if the reports of brutality from guards was due to the way guards treated prisoners or the prison environment.

Read More
1129 Words | 5 Pages

The second aspect that should be highlighted from the author’s hypothesis is that guards themselves, the authority was in a specific mind-set which comes with the role, and most significantly the uniform which played a major role. This enabled them, psychology to commit the negative acts against the prisoners in the experiment. What reinforces this idea the uniforms enabled this is the experiment encouraged negative as well as positive engagement with the prisoners. However most of those involved in the guard roles engaged almost entirely in negative behavior.

Read More
633 Words | 3 Pages

The novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley has many characters with flaws that are dynamically complex interplay between individual characters that play critical roles in the meaning and makeup of the story for the reader. Since 1818 when the novel was first published, people have been reading this miraculous novel and learning many valuable lessons from Shelley’s writing. In the story, the character Victor creates life which is “the Creature,” and is horrified by his creation and abandons it. The Creature in the story is the character that evolves the most with the story and is changed by every encounter. The creature demonstrates this by learning from each situation and applying the same or enhanced plan to achieve his goals.

Read More

More about What Are The Good Guards In The Stanford Prison Experiment

Related Topics

Open Document