State Rep. Randy Dunn D-Kansas City, has filed House Bill 497, which would adopt an agreement to elect the President of the United States by the nation popular vote instead of by the decision of the Electoral College. House Bill No. 497 comes in response to outdated and unjust Electoral College system. “Every Missourians’ vote should count the same,” said Dunn. “Whoever the majority votes for that given person should be the victor.
In my own words some of the pros and cons of the Electoral College are as followed and explained. My pros are that it maintains the federalist system, and allows for minority interests to be represented. It helps maintain the federalist system by keeping all of the branches of government equal. It helps allow for minority interests to be represented by helping the interest and have the ability to be represented and backed up by bigger parties to help get votes. My cons of the Electoral College are that is does not reflect the popular vote, and lowers voter turnout.
I. The Electoral College is an unnecessary institution that undermines democracy by not ensuring the victory of the presidential candidate who wins the plurality of the popular vote, by creating a system in which not all votes are equal, and by incentivizing politicians to focus on the needs of specific states while ignoring others. II. A. The Electoral College is a body of people that represent each state within the United States and formally cast votes for their state in the election of the president.
Nathan Palm Mr. Baker American Government Electoral College or Not In the 1787 Constitutional Convention, one of the hardest questions to resolve was how to elect the president. (Roos) The Founding Fathers debated for months and came up with the compromise known as the Electoral College. Alternatives such as Congress picking the president and a democratic popular vote were discussed, but the electoral college was the method agreed upon by the Founding Fathers.
The United States of America has a rich history filled with success, failure, courage, and drive. Millions have come seeking the “American Dream” and to live in the land of the free. The past is what has shaped this nation’s present and future. Yet, as time drifts, the world around us changes. What was once deemed acceptable can now seem outdated in today’s society.
Ever since the election involving Bush and Gore, the viability of the Electoral College has become a heatedly debated topic. The question is whether the Electoral College is still an effective system considering the conditions the United States faces today as opposed to the conditions that the Founding Fathers faced when they created it. For over one hundred and fifty years, the United States has used this system, and controversy has followed it ever since. It was created in an effort to protect the people and institution of America by putting the final vote of the presidency in the hands of a trusted and respected few. These few have the power to disregard the popular vote due to the fact that there is still no federal law demanding electors
The Electoral College has been one of the most debated topics in politics ever since its inception. The original idea behind the College was that, back in the 1700s, when communications were slow, voters were uninformed, and votes were counted by hand, the Framers needed a streamlined and efficient system for electing the President. The college worked – and made sense – back then. The question is: does it still apply today? Today, Americans have the technology to vote directly for a President, yet they don’t.
There are many different opinions on whether the electoral college is outdated: People say there is no point for it being there anymore or there is still good uses for it. But despite opinions, the electoral should stay as it is because it allows an equal voting system. For example, To win a presidency they would need 270 electoral votes. The states also get one elector per state. As shown on the picture above, Wisconsin receives 10 votes-other states vary.
« The Constitution is the guide which I never will abandon. » George Washington declared. Indeed, the United States of America adopted the founding law on June 21, 1788. This Constitution, still enforced today, defines the Federal Republic.
When the making of the Electoral College, the founding fathers took into condensation that the small states might not be noticed, so they had to take some of the electoral votes from the bigger states. And to add on to the existence Allen Guelzo and James Hulme go on to say that “It may appear inefficient. But the Founders were not interested in efficiency; they were interested in securing “the blessings of liberty.” With this in mind we can conclude that we do need change within its system, but its core values are at heart a system to help us. With this in mind, there has been many articles that help you explore the
Do you want a voting system that can be a disadvantage to you? The Electoral College is not useful in today’s elections. In most electoral college elections there are only two candidates, this can lower the diversity of the candidates that the people can vote for. Furthermore, if we switch to a Direct election it would be much simpler and eliminate the need for the Electoral College which is very complicated. Importantly, the Electoral College is a complex voting system that may be confusing to many voters and it decreases the variation on which candidate to choose.
Throughout the years, there have been many qualms regarding the electoral college. Does the Electoral College properly represent the will of the American people? Is the electoral college an outdated system? Recently, these questions resurfaced as the election of 2016 resulted in the projection of Donald Trump triumphing over Hilary Clinton, even though Clinton received more popular votes at the end of the election. I believe that the Electoral College should be removed and changed to a more balanced system which reflects the needs and wants of each individual residing in America rather than society that does not account for the greater population of America in an old-fashioned system where the framers of the Constitution did not trust the American people to elect a leader worthy of the title.
Throughout history, there have been around eleven thousand constitutional amendments proposed. Over one thousand of them have had something to do with the Electoral College, mostly being proposals to change it into a popular vote. Yet, well over forty years have passed since congress has seriously considered a constitutional amendment to abolish it (Williams). From the number of proposals and alternatives for electoral reform that have been introduced since the Constitutional Convention, some have been seriously considered and some have been just plain bizarre. For example, Senator James Hillhouse’s proposal in 1808 that would allow retiring senators to choose a president by drawing colored balls from a box (Hardaway).
In 1787, years after the founding of the United States, the Constitutional Convention met to decide how the new nation would govern itself. The delegates understood that the need for a leader was necessary but still bitterly remembered how Britain abused of its power. The delegates agreed that the President and Vice President should be chosen informally and not based on the direct popular vote, thus gave birth to the Electoral College. The Electoral College is defined as “a body of people representing the states of the US, who formally cast votes for the election of the president and vice president.” Since 1787 the Electoral College has been the system for voting in the United States, but with our nation ever more changing and growing it
Election day 2016; the current political state is looking grim. More than half of Americans are upset that their majority voice has not been heard. I pondered the idea of the electoral college for quite some time looking into all the facts and reasons our founding fathers included such a system. Coming back from this experience with a changed outlook on this particular topic. I believe that the electoral college is a necessity for our government's framework.
