that there exist other “legitimate” vehicles of change, and that allowing such actions in a time of war would be tantamount to declaring the constitution a “suicide pact”.
Eugene Debs, political leader of the Socialist Party of America and candidate for the American Presidency, faced similar restrictions on his free speech during wartime. Presenting an anti-war speech protesting the United States involvement in World War I, Debs was arrested under the Espionage act of 1917 and ultimately convicted, for openly protesting against the war. The State’s case against Debs was founded on a document written by Debs called the Anti-War Proclamation and Program, apparently illustrating that Debs' original intent was in fact to openly protest US involvement
…show more content…
United States, Abrams was guilty of a crime also very similar to Schenck’s. Caught disseminating flyers he had received from an anarchist meeting out of the fourth story window of a building, the flyers themselves contained a critique of the Woodrow administration for their involvement in the Russian Revolution. The actual crimes Abrams’ and his associate’s were charged with were the intent to hinder the production of the materials necessary to continue the progress of the war. However this case is interesting because it marks a shift in the positions of pros and cons with regard to the application of the clear and present danger test, given that the “bad tendency” test was used to decided it. The founder of the doctrine Judge Holmes dissented when it became obvious to him that the court was deviating from the precedents first established in Schenck and subsequent cases. He believed individuals expressing their opinion or beliefs should enjoy full protection from the first amendment, “but that expressions made with the specific intent to cause a criminal harm, or that threatened a clear and present danger of such harm, could be punished.”3 Essentially he made clear his position that honest representation of ones beliefs was vital to the American tradition of a marketplace of free ideas and that, “The best test of truth is the power of the thought to get itself accepted in the competition of the market, and that truth is the only ground upon which their wishes safely can be carried