(U) The Revolutionary Armed Forces of Columbia (FARC) never has and never will conduct a cyber-attack against the United States or its interests. Prior to June 2016 FARC was a violent guerilla organization. Although they would have benefitted from cyber warfare strategies, they only ever utilized traditional guerilla and terror tactics. The FARC was not technologically adept enough to be a cyber threat.
Introduction The Joint Terrorism Task Forces and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Fusion Centers are two crucial intelligence-gathering programs in the United States. Both programs play a big role in preventing terrorist attacks and other criminal activities, such as drug and weapon smuggling. These agencies are responsible for collecting and analyzing intelligence information to identify potential terrorist threats and prevent attacks. Understanding the history and impact on the United States is essential to ensure effective law enforcement and national security measures. This paper will examine the history of the Joint Terrorism Task Forces and DHS Fusion Centers, the benefits of the programs, the impact of the programs on national security
The only difference is that our enemy is more imminent; instead
Conflict resolution in the United States may be achieved by the cooperation of states, opening up proper channels for information to flow, and through the prevention of Russia taking any further action which may cause harm. While the institutions and rules put into place do not explicitly assist states in achieving their respective self-interests, through cooperation these states, such as the United States, increase their security and chance of
Since its initial discovery, America has intricately intertwined itself in international affairs. Ranging from outright enemies to close allies, the United States has experienced a wide variety of foreign relationships. During World War II, the nation found itself at odds with the dictatorships of Germany and Italy. More recently, America has suffered conflicts with countries such as Vietnam and Afghanistan. Yet, throughout its history, the United States has also entertained alliances with numerous different countries such as Poland, Australia, and Canada.
For the comparison between these two is that the way they began. For the civil defense era it all began during the 1970s when the World War II was happening in that time. For the creation of Homeland Security it was all established in the year of 2001 after the huge disaster of 9/11 occurred in New York City. Another comparison between both Civil Defense Era and Homeland Security on how they use federalism. For the civil defense era, they are shown to have a better use for federalism while homeland security was shown to be more of a failure because of “. . .
1. CJCS fulfills the role of principal military adviser in the National Security Council system. The CJCS is the senior most military advisor to the President and in such provides that guidance directly to the President, and by participating in National Security Council Principals meetings in person. During these meetings he provides his best professional military advice to the President and the other cabinet members of the NSC. Additionally, he will send his senior most policy advisor the Joint Staff J5 to sit in on Deputies committee meetings and give his guidance at this next level down.
The battle highlighted intelligence capabilities, such as interrogation
In accordance with the 2014 Quadrennial Homeland Security Review, the terrorist threat is one of the prevailing challenges that pose a significant risk level to the United States as well as to American citizens abroad and many U.S. allies (Department of Homeland Security, 2014). In the United States, the Federal Government assumes the responsibility for leading the efforts that seek to manage the risk level of the terrorist threat. That is why the Federal Government has created the Department of Homeland Security (DHS), whose main mission is to prevent terrorist threats by managing their risk levels (DHS, 2014). Since the terrorist threat is a very complex threat to manage for one entity or agency alone, the DHS is able to accomplish its main mission by working in partnerships with many federal agencies; State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial (SLLTT) Governments; private and public organizations; international partners; and communities all across the United States (DHS, 2014). In all of those partnerships, the Federal Government through the DHS plays a leadership role
Similarity in the due process – this involves the process through which the federal and states law enforcement individuals gather evidence, interviews the apprehended, and make arrests. 2. Similarity in the court proceeding – Both the federal and the state courts similarly conduct their court proceeding 3. Similarity in sentencing and appeal – even though they have a different sentencing guideline for different crimes, they do have a similar appeal
As Disrupters The strength of future militaries will be compared to our own; the expansive reach of the US military is the largest on Earth. From conflicts in South America to the Middle East and Asia, the US has always thrived during wartime, gaining much of its power from the aftermath of World War II. By much of the world today our country is seen as democratic invaders; bringing a message of democracy and freedom while still firmly holding our weapons. In this way, our country has shaped the world drastically; influencing both the progress of technology and the equivalent sizes of foreign militaries.
Strategic intelligence collection is a critical component of national security efforts, enabling decision-makers to gather, analyze, and disseminate information essential for protecting the interests of the United States. Within the US Intelligence Community, multiple intelligence disciplines are employed to gather intelligence from various sources. This essay explores the capabilities and limitations of strategic intelligence collection within the US Intelligence Community, with a focus on the benefits and use of each intelligence discipline. By examining human intelligence (HUMINT), signals intelligence (SIGINT), imagery intelligence (IMINT), measurement and signature intelligence (MASINT), and open-source intelligence (OSINT), we gain insights
Defence is also understood to be an important contributing factor in a nation's economic strength and diplomatic influence in global
Introduction Does having the CIA be the responsible body for carrying out covert action create a conflict of interest when CIA/National Clandestine Service is responsible for both covert action AND collecting and feeding information to CIA/Directorate of Intelligence for strategic intelligence analysis? To answer this question, I will analyze who the CIA delegates human intelligence collection to as well as covert action through the Directorate of Intelligence and the National Clandestine Service, to identify a conflict of interest in any instances over time. The Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is a massive federal government agency that primarily works overseas, in other countries, conducting operations, collecting intelligence, and analyzing it. Discerning whether there is a conflict of interest can only be done by understanding what the National Clandestine Service and the Directorate of Intelligence do and an instance in which may have compromised both the Directorate of Intelligence and the National Clandestine Service, to cause a conflict of interest.
Personal vision about the future of cyberwarfare Cyberwarfare already exists in reality and has been spread out among countries or organizations over the past few decades. The rising technologies including artificial intelligence and computational neural networks used by future computers will not only be significant in a new era of power and communications, but will also broaden the channel for cybercrimes, attacks and warfare. Future cyberwarfare will continue to scale up attacks against governments, corporations and even civilians in the next decade where it will be on par with traditional military and will might surpass these tactics. Future cyberwarfare will not just be targeted against military agencies or other government agencies.
