There is no maximum farthest point to the dangers men will take keeping in mind the end goal to succeed, and if there is a furthest breaking point for ladies, they will succeed less." (Clay Shirky, 202) Shirky, the author of "A Angry speech about Women" argues that women must become more aggressive and demanding to (in the end) complete their/reach their goals. No matter how (community of people/all good people in the world) reacts, men take on any action, going around the "Golden Rule" to complete their/reach their goals and desires. On the other hand, ladies do not have this technique in their look for self-advancement, Shirky argues. However, in Chisholm's speech "Equal Rights for Women", Chisholm argues that the definitely true reason for …show more content…
First off, both authors share quite almost the same viewpoints, but I do believe one is stronger than the other; Shirky's position is stronger than Chisholm's. While Chisholm argues that the root of (women and men not treated equally) is the lack of opportunities women are given at work, she does include that women need to become more aggressive to fix that. More than that, while Shirky mainly describes how women need to become more aggressive and demanding, he does provide the fact that women are unfairly treated. As Shirky describes, "Some of the reason these (success plans/ways of reaching goals) succeed is because we live in a world where women are unfairly treated." (pg. 203, p 15) However, one article provides more of a procedure to fix this issue rather than stating all the (event(s) or object(s) that prove something) to show the issue exists; and that is Shirky's article. Rather than blaming (community of people/all good people in the world) for your problems, Shirky goes into detail what women themselves could do to change the (state where two things are not the same) between men and women. As Shirky illustrates, "It would be good if more women got in the habit of raising their hands and saying, 'I can do that. Sign me up. My work is awesome," no matter how many people that behavior upsets. It's not that Chisholm's argument