ipl-logo

What Happened At Tasha's Trial?

742 Words3 Pages

What happened: Well in this event there were two main parts, the first part being the Tasha’s father’s lawyer suggesting Tasha to go to court for her father 's bail hearing. So basically what happened Tasha went to go see Tasha’s father 's lawyer and he suggested to Tasha that she go to court but she was confused because it was going to be a school day. Then the lawyer explained that if Tasha went to court it would show the judge that Leonard’s family cared about him and believed in him enough to go to court and support him and possibly let him out on bail. The lawyer also suggested Tasha to cry about for hope the judge would have sympathy for her. Tasha agreed to everything, she would do anything to get her father free. The next day was the trial, …show more content…

THe court began and after a long bail hearing the judge thought that letting Leonard out to spend time with his family would be good, but the judge deemed Leonard to be too dangerous and set him for no bail and to stay put in his cell till his trial …show more content…

Where did the event happen: The event happened in two different places the first place being in Tasha’s father’s lawyer office, that is where him and Tasha had their meeting about Tasha’s going to the trial and what for her to do at the trial. The other place the event took place was at a courthouse in the city of Toronto (where the book takes place) to have the bail hearing for Leonard Scanlan.
Why did the event happen: Well the reason there was a bail trial was to decide if Tasha’s father should be kept in jail until the trial or if he should be able to be on parole and be able to spend time with his family. The reason Leonard’s lawyer told Tasha to go to the hearing and to cry at it was to show the judge that Tasha’s family misses him and to hope the judge showed sympathy and let Leonard on parole until the trial. The judge chose to keep Leonard in jail cause the judge deemed Leonard too dangerous to be let free and also to s=take away the chance of him fleeing

Show More
Related
1232 Words | 5 Pages

Trial was scheduled two months later, and Clarence was unprepared (David J Shestokas par 12). This was due to the fact that he was unable to afford a lawyer (David J Shestokas par 12). Logically, Clarence

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

This level of court is appropriate because Slager had one state charge and two federal charges. Key characters in the case Slager, Mr. Scott, lawyer Andrew J. Savage III, prosecutor Scarlett A. Wilson and Judge David Norton are the key characters in this case. Slager was just doing his duty by pulling over Mr. Scott for having a broken taillight. Mr. Scott, according to his family, probably ran away fearing that he would be arrested for failed child support payments. Andrew Savage III and Scarlett A. Wilson agreed to the plea of guilty.

Read More
1304 Words | 6 Pages

RESPONDENT’S ANSWER In response to the first issue, Marshard explains “my file notes state I met with Mr. Sylvia to explain that the Court would appoint him an attorney to explore his 5th Amendment right and to discuss with him whether he wished to waive or assert that right.” Marshard maintains that she wanted Silvia to know he was a victim in this matter and not a defendant. She states this was important because “(1) the pending clerk’s hearing where charges were being pursued by Mr. Petersen and (2) Mr. Sylvia had often been a defendant when the court appointed him an attorney.” Marshard claims Silvia “does not always appear to accurately grasp the situation.”

Read More
692 Words | 3 Pages

Reports circulated through the internet that when Joe arrived at the prison to turn himself in, he was drunk. He was supposed to be checked into a minimum-security section of the jail, but because he was drunk, he was sent to the maximum-security side. The prison officials could not believe that Joe would arrive drunk and that he “made a mockery of the court by immediately breaking the rules.” The people who drove Joe to the prison had to stop off for coffee in order to sober him up before he arrived, but it did not fool the prison officials.

Read More
280 Words | 2 Pages

But, after a shooting happened in the neighborhood and a baby is killed in a hit and ru Tia finds out the truth about her dad. Her dad had shot a girl while trying to commit a robbery years ago and  got sent to prison for murder. Keisha tries to tell Tia to give up and stop trying to find out more about her father and that he committed a serious crime and should not be forgiven.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

The District of Columbia courts needs to waive and remit before he is able to be tried. At this time there was a motion filed to have him receive the case waived. The judge filed for a ‘full investigation’, which lead to Kent’s case being waived from the juvenile courts. He was then tried in the District Court. The jury found Kent guilty of six counts of housebreaking and robbery.

Read More
343 Words | 2 Pages

Hank and his crew were jailed, but later released due to a biased judge, a lack of evidence, and the denial of counsel. This factor had clearly provided fuel for the

Read More
1170 Words | 5 Pages

Williamson could not gain assistance from his parents as they passed away. Williamson’s sisters however did acknowledge he needed assistance and their support before and during his trial. Unfortunately, they were left with very limited ways to help him such as convincing police to grant him limited permission to attend the family funeral before the trial. Describe District Attorney Bill Peterson’s legal tactics and motivation in convicting Williamson and

Read More
943 Words | 4 Pages

As he sat down at the police office, the guards asked questions with the intention of finding him guilty. He knew they wanted to get inside

Read More
468 Words | 2 Pages

He spent over 5 months in jail until the judge decided that he can’t force Scarce to testify. The judge then released Scarce out of

Read More
972 Words | 4 Pages

He appealed his conviction and sentence to the Fourth District Court of Appeal and they affirmed that the Act does not violate any constitutionality challenged the defendant. Facts 1. The defendant committed to serve time for certain crimes and he was prison released in August 1996. 2.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

The woman claimed to witness the stabbing of the father. She says that she saw the boy stab the father and run away. He then asks if they don't believe the boy then why believe the woman if she is from a slum as well. Juror 8 then thinks of the obstructions in the woman's view. He remembers that there is an el train in between the woman's window and the boy's house.

Read More
655 Words | 3 Pages

In Salem, Massachusetts a series of hearings and prosecutions started, commonly known as the Salem Witchcraft Trials. The witchcraft trials in Salem became a big concern after two-hundred innocent people were accused and twenty people were executed. Many people of Salem believed the court was just in accusing all these victims. A seldom amount of people went against the court in saying that the court was a fraud and that the decisions were biased being made. Abigail Williams held all the power in the court and determined who was “guilty” or not.

Read More
367 Words | 2 Pages

The trial starts very tediously with the court spending over three hours trying to force Joan into swearing an oath, but they end up letting Joan give the oath in her own manner

Read More
1271 Words | 6 Pages

“Johns hearing is on the 13th of August, 9 o’clock in the morning and here is my card call me if there is anything you need to talk more about.” It instantly clicked for Chelsea why she had been given the case. John just needed to some to represent him and speak for him at court. Michael was was going to do the rest for him. Miss Walker was someone that would let people walk over her so that's why she asked or now she believes recommended to take the case.

Read More

More about What Happened At Tasha's Trial?

Related Topics

Open Document