John Locke discusses within in his book, “Second Treatise of Government,” the concepts of natural rights of individuals as well as the legitimate exercise of political power. Within his writing, Locke links his beliefs to a theory of personal property. This joining of ideas helps Locke make an argument against mainly unjust governments. In addition to his argument, Locke aims to explain how he believes that people have the right to rebel against their own government. In fact, he promotes people to rebel against their own government because everyone should have a government that they trust. Overall, this is what Locke aims to make apparent in his book. Locke’s integration of his concepts of natural rights as well as the legitimate exercise of …show more content…
For one, Locke makes an argument against the divine right of monarchs. In his book, Locke criticizes the argument that is in support of the divine right of monarchs. According to Locke, such an argument cannot be correct because the theory states that every man is born a slave to the natural born kings. Locke refuses to accept such a theory because of his belief in reason and in the ability that every man can govern himself according to God’s law. Locke believes that the people should be in control of choosing who their leaders are. He believes that citizens should be able to make their own choices towards their happiness and general well-being. He also believes that this freedom is a citizen’s natural right and should be granted to them. According to Locke, a government should be established as a way of preserving the rights of individuals. Locke felt that if the government overstepped its boundaries or abused its power, then the citizens would have every right to rebel. The argument in support of the divine right of monarchs encourages individuals to conform and live a controlled lifestyle, which in turn, was the main reason why Locke did not