According to Kant’s moral philosophy, corruption can only be fought by tackling the real reasons behind corruption acts, however corruption in some cases is allowed by the law despite the society terming it as unethical behavior. Corruption is a vice that has harmed operation efficiency of many institutions, organizations, companies and governments. It is considered an unethical behavior by the majority in the society, because of its ability to misuse power or authority granted upon by the goodwill of the people in the case of governments or abuse of code of ethics of organizations or companies. However, an interesting analogy to look at, is based on the fact that various global legislations refer certain corruption practices legal despite the negative implications the name brings along. Corruption therefore in a moral definitive concept can be called negative or positive depending of the main reason the party want to achieve. This analogy to some extent contrast Kant’s Categorical Imperative aspect. Kant is the famous philosopher behind the deontological ethical theory, the reason underlying categorical imperative. Categorical imperative in …show more content…
It is considered unethical to a larger extent by the society, because it goes against the existing accepted moral culture. Negative corruption is immoral because it entails abuse of power and authority imposed by the law or constitution. This corruption, involves personal benefit at the expense of the society and it’s therefore considered immoral by the society. The immorality aspect in negative corruption captures sign of greed, inequity, favoritism, abuse of discretion and clientelism. This corruption has negative effects on political, social and economic systems of any given demographic region. According to philosophy, corruption moral aspect is defined by the degree of the society’s general acceptance; it can either be accepted or not