ipl-logo

What Is The Difference Between The Washington Post And Alaskan Dispatch News

1266 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Case study for hate crime

These two articles, from The Washington Post and Alaskan Dispatch News discuss hate crimes from two different perspectives. Alaskan Dispatch News takes a more conservative look at hate crime laws, as the title is “Time to Scrap Hate-Crime Laws.” The Washington Post takes an opposite stance, and is more liberal, as the title states that “…Its More Important Than Ever to Fight Hate and Bigotry.” Just the titles of these two articles alone sets the stage for the side the article will be taking. The Washington Post has a heavy focus that hate-crime laws are necessary in order to maintain equality. The authors, Brooks and Greenblatt say that hate-crime laws demonstrate that bigotry will not be tolerated. Bigotry is when a person is intolerant …show more content…

Its biggest strengths are the author’s persuasive use of logos, which appeal to logic. The article uses the origins of identifying hate-crimes which gained currency in the 1980s. There are other captivating facts throughout the article such as talking about what makes a murder first degree. A second aspect to this editorial is the use of a real incident in the beginning. It brings the reader to reality and has them connect with a news story they had heard, but on a deeper level. The author uses the incident to frame the whole article in order to show the controversy. People initially reading the article will have their own opinions on the hate motivated incident, but the end of the article will sway these ideals; because after all, “Is the killer who shouts bigoted epithets more dangerous to society than the quiet sadist who first tortures his murder victim without comment?” (Hanson …show more content…

Both of the articles use persuasive techniques to evoke a reaction out of the reader. Each article has a different view on hate-crimes and they each use different persuasive techniques. The Alaskan Dispatch Network takes a more conservative approach on hate-crimes, saying they need to be “scrapped,” while the Washington Post takes a liberal side, saying that we need to fight hate. The articles both have the same purpose, to get the reader to view hate-crimes from their side. The editorials both talked about the media and how it influences the way that the public sees the issue of hate-crimes. Media plays an important role, and looking at it through a constructionist perspective, (or the social construction of reality) it is the most important factor that affects the way society views an

Show More
Related
520 Words | 3 Pages

“Why We Should Keep the Confederate Monuments Right Where They Are” by John Daniel Davidson is persuasive to an audience of U.S. citizens with the use of rhetorical strategies. Davidson gives the reader interest through the use of authority and expert testimony. He does this by describing President Donald Trump throughout his reading. The audience therefore becomes attracted to this text, because the mention of a big name such as the President, making this text effective. This article is also persuasive through the use of statistical evidence.

Read More
565 Words | 3 Pages

A black man falls casualty in a car accident after a white male driver fails to stop his car. On his social media page, posts containing racist comments are found throughout his page. The black community voice their outrage on this crime by commenting, "This is an attack against our society!" Many people argue, that for such cases, a hate crime law needs to be instated and enforced; however, in the article "Should Hate Be a Crime?" a man named James B. Jacobs argues against the legislation of hate crime laws.

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Today crime is no longer associated with murder, theft, and assault among other common offenses but rather the bracket encompassing crimes has increased. This is because in addition to these common offenses there are hate crimes and cyber crimes which are evolving as the world continues to change. The justice system has thus established crime laws that are meant to protect citizens in a nation against these crimes. The Mathew Sheppard and James Byrd act are hate crime laws designed to prevent hate offenses against individuals as a result factors such as gender, ethnicity, and culture (Mogul, Ritchie, and Whitlock, 2011).

Read More
1299 Words | 6 Pages

According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in 1998 there were over 7,755 hate crime incidents reported in America, which stemmed from people’s biased views towards people of different races (46.9%), sexual orientations (20.8%), religions (19.8%), ethnicity and (11.6%), and people with disabilities (0.9%). All 7,755 of the crimes were more than just violence; they were violence driven by hatred. They were hate crimes. The FBI defines a hate crime as a “a traditional offense like murder, arson, or vandalism with an added element of bias.” This is certainly the case of the murder of Matthew Shepard in Laramie Wyoming.

Read More
861 Words | 4 Pages

Defining a Racist On the FBI website the statistics for hate crimes committed in 2015, 59.2% of hate crimes were against African-Americans. A hate crime is defined as a crime committed against a certain group of person(s) which is why we need to define what a racist or racist comment is. Defining what a racist is could help decrease the amount of hate crimes committed against either Anglo or African-American people. Defining what a racist is could also help alleviate some tensions between Anglos and African-American, Jewish people and Christians, and Pakistanis and Indians. Malcolm Gladwell’s definition of racism helps clear out the misunderstanding and tension that some comments like Michael Irvin’s about Tony Romo’s athletic ability create.

Read More
840 Words | 4 Pages

In his essay, “Just Walk on By: A Black Man Ponders His Power to Alter Public Space”, Brent Staples uses the rhetorical strategies of anecdote and diction in order to convey his message that due to racial discrimination black people (mainly men) have to change the way they naturally conduct themselves in public for they run the risk of something terrible happening to them. Staples uses anecdotes to bring in the personal side of the message to the audience. Staples creates a persona of innocence and almost alienation in his writing. Anecdotes such as his both instances in which he accidently scared women on walks and the time in which he and another reporter were mistaken for murder suspects or robbers are used to show real life proof of his message.

Read More
164 Words | 1 Pages

Anti-Muslim hate crimes have been recently rising in the US. Hate crimes are destructive, and harmful to the victim. A hate crime is an offensive like murder, arson, or vandalism that is inflicted on the victim because of the victims race, color, religion, or natural origin. Attack numbers on Muslims like 5,479 in 2014, and 5,850 in 2015 are not right and continuing to increase.

Read More
140 Words | 1 Pages

Capital punishment, especially in the face of hate crimes, is on the rise in the United States. With it comes the raised question: What crimes should elicit the death penalty? Moreover, is the death penalty even humane? Hate crimes are considered especially odious in the comparison of other crimes, therefore receiving harsher punitive measures than most other crimes. The proposal of issuing the death penalty in the face of hate crimes and incidents is steadily gaining popularity as well as harsher criticism against the overall humanity of capital punishment.

Read More
1481 Words | 6 Pages

Hate crime What distinguishes a hate crime from other crimes is an underlying motivation based on the victim’s group membership. There has been much debate over the constitutionality of hate crime laws and which groups (if any) should be protected by such legislation. Those against hate crime laws argue that it is a violation of First Amendment protections of free, association, and freedom of thought. The Supreme Court confirmed that freedom of thought is implied by the First Amendment in R.A.V. v. St. Paul which those against hate crime laws argue makes such laws unconstitutional.

Read More
307 Words | 2 Pages

Hate crimes are defined as a crime motivated by racial, sexual, or other prejudice, typically one involving violence. Not everyone believes hate crimes are a real problem in this country. Many believe it’s a media-exaggerated issue and therefore don’t believe there should be laws against hate crimes. However, while hate crimes have received considerable attention in recent years, the epidemic is far from new. A majority of this nation has laws against hate crimes, but the severity of punishments differs from state to state.

Read More
1355 Words | 6 Pages

Hate crimes have been around for hundreds of years. To this day, it continues to negatively impact the world. It especially affects the people who experience it. Whether it be because they are gay or because they are Muslim. Hate crime can apply to anyone who has been assaulted by someone who is motivated by bias over a group.

Read More
532 Words | 3 Pages

The people who support these hate crime laws argue that the laws will stop further hate crimes. In reality, these “hate crimes” will not be stopped with a couple laws because criminals will continue to commit crimes no matter what laws are in place. Hate crime laws should not be enacted for the reason stated previously, and they should not be enacted because the punishment for the crimes committed will not change. Laws for “hate crimes” will not put an end to criminal violence with prejudicial intent. Criminals who would want to harm another person based on

Read More
842 Words | 4 Pages

Hate Crime is a “criminal offense against a person or property motivated in whole or in part by an offender's bias against a race, religion, disability, sexual orientation, ethnicity, gender, or gender identity.” If an African American commits the same crime as an Caucasian it is more likely for the black person to be charged and arrested due to the racial issues we have today. There are many pros and cons towards the issue of racial crime, but hate crime is still a very difficult issue for our country to overcome. In order to overcome the issue of hate crime it would require changing legislation, public and police attitudes.

Read More
481 Words | 2 Pages

So the laws should be more severe. All and all, I told you about Hate crimes and the issues that comes with it. What do you think if you were in James Byrd Jr shoes or life what would you have done? What I think is, we should not commit horrid crimes because of someone's belief or disabilities. In 2012 Over 1,000 people died from Hate crimes.

Read More
2345 Words | 10 Pages

looks at how it ultimately affects society and targeted groups. There are a myriad of arguments for and against the allowance of hate speech. Some citing Democracy and the first amendment others stem from the fear of eroded freedoms of expression and have valid points, but ultimately, it corrodes society’s human rights and freedoms. The two fold issue being intolerance of the freedom of self-determination and the fact that some are born a color or culture and have no choice. Therefore, hate speech is anti-social and damaging to society as a whole.

Read More

More about What Is The Difference Between The Washington Post And Alaskan Dispatch News

Related Topics

Open Document