What Is The Moral Of Looking For Richard By Al Pacino

909 Words4 Pages

Conceptual values are envisioned jointly while demonstrating exemplary differences, the modern adaptation of Pacino praises Shakespeare's work even in a different context. The play Richard the Third is adapted and reinvisioned into a hollywood film as shown within the docu-drama Looking for Richard by Al Pacino. Within the Elizabethan era Shakespeare conceptualises Richard as a damned evil that Pacino manipulates to characterise him with human motivations and ambitions that relate to a Post-Cold War modern time. The evolution towards secularism in the modern era disjoints the perception of key roles such as women, whose old time values are misinterpreted. Pacinos documentary wishes to conceive Shakespeare to a wider audience and adapt Richard …show more content…

Elizabethan morals are majorly based upon christian beliefs, rulership of the throne was said to have been precedent which relate to the chain of being. Richards core value of ambition negates this belief and does whatever means necessary to achieve his goal, sin that disbands the divine right of rulership. Where by the end of the play he dreams of the consequences of his actions, “Murder, stern murder, in the direst degree; All several sins, all used in each degree, Throng to the bar, crying all, Guilty! Guilty!”. The sincere tone of the scene emphasises his despair as he repeats the lines “guilty” and “murder” to the highest “degree”, portraying the protagonist at the lowest point of the story. The proclamation of his guilt to all of his sins and that no matter what he is the murderer that killed his family, upholds the belief that the tyranny Richard enacts is evil and even he knows it. But Shakespeare himself developed bias towards the development of Richard from the fact that the then monarch reign of Queen Elizabeth oversaw the project, aptly proclaimed propaganda of tyranny and the past war of the roses. The modern political landscape has shifted, Pacino adapts to the individualistic capitalism of America where Shakespeare is …show more content…

Shakespeare was out of his time to demonstrate true power within women with the influence of the queen; the portrayal of women was carefully crafted to appeal and innovate the social views society had at that time. An interview with a scholar ignites the discussion that the manipulation of Lady Anne, purely from oratory skill whereby her husband's wounds open to the sight of Richard, serves a void purpose. The carefully crafted structural nature of Act 1 Scene 2 in which Lady Anne first expresses long emotive cruelty and curses towards Richard for killing her husband, he himself only replies in short decisive flirtation, eventually switching roles and developing in the outlandish conclusion of marriage. Pacino's main purpose of the documentary is to extrapolate Shakespeare's hidden intention that is unbeknownst to a modern audience. An in-depth insight was outburst by actor Penelpoe, “By diminishing their actions, you diminish his” notifying the importance of female characters. Pacino exemplifies the importance of women as an asset that is used to enhance the story. Modern social perception is inclined to mitigate the vulnerabilities of women, but the old societal values that a woman needs a man to pose any action is necessary for Richard III. Power given to women is the power of emotional oration and knowledge portrayed by Lady Anne for her anguish and spitefulness of Richard. For Richard to

More about What Is The Moral Of Looking For Richard By Al Pacino