Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pathos rhetorical analysis essay
Pathos rhetorical appeal is used
Rhetorical analysis on pathos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Pathos rhetorical analysis essay
Pathos rhetorical appeal is used
Rhetorical analysis on pathos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Dr. Patrick Miller gave an amazing and interesting speech on the issue of the Confederate flag and monuments. The presenter went through the history of what the Confederate flag once stood for and how it became a symbol that affects minorities today. I really like how he was able to relate everything that was occurring in modern times. Something that surprised me is the vast amount of monuments that are still stand to this very day. Dr. Miller told the audience the great lengths people have gone to remove anything that is related to the Confederacy, for example, the many schools in the south were renamed after Obama since they were originally named after Confederate fugues, such as: Robert E. Lee, Stonewall Jackson, and Jefferson Davis.
The monuments display grandeur through their great beauty and intricate details, which is what intrigues passersby from stopping and admiring these aspects. Even though they are different in scale, both of the monuments display a sense of monumentality that plays a part in catching the attention of viewers. The meanings behind the monuments is how they show permanence; the reason why each monument was built will be permanent in their history because their respective histories represent not only the history of Florida State University, but also how far the university has evolved since its former years. The historical meaning behind the Integration Statue and Legacy Fountain make them both intentional statues. The Integration Statue was created to display the steps that Florida State has made to integrating African American students into the school, and the three African American students who made milestones at the University.
It shows tribute to all the people who were lynched and killed during that time. It gives them recognition for losing their life and it allows history to be showed through the monument. An example of the lynching happening is when fifteen blacks were lynched during Watson election (Zinn, pg. 292). This just shows how innocent blacks were killed trying to bring peace and justice to them in America.
The 8th grade class took a 4 day trip to Washington. We did many things to explore Washington D.C. including visiting monuments. Some people think differently of how a monument should be made. Good monuments to some people could be to make people remember about the person or thing being remembered or to just reflect the person’s life or importance. In “The Follower Problem” by David Brooks, David thinks a good monument should show power and authority.
Kirk Savage suggests in Source A (Savage), “The public monument speaks to a deep need for attachment that can be met only in a real place, where
Barack Obama -- former president, civil rights advocate, Christian, husband, father, and African American -- delivers a speech commemorating the statue of Rosa Parks. Such a speech was presented at the National Statuary Hall of the United States Capitol building in 2013 in the midst of a time when African Americans were fighting for racial equality. During his speech, Obama employs various rhetorical strategies to impart the significance of standing up for oneself and taking action to bring about social justice, like what civil rights activist, Rosa Parks, fought so tirelessly for. Obama opens his speech by asserting why Parks deserves a statue in her honor in order to lend credence to the American people concerning Parks’ feats. Utilizing
Ambrose believes the Washington Monument and National Mall are appropriate symbolic locations for civil “controversy, protest, and persuasion” because it reminds us greatness comes at a price. Ambrose writes that over the past 100 years, the area has been a center for controversy such as the Civil rights movement, and protesting the Vietnam war. Ambrose also states that on the Mall “our national discord is on display” and that allows us to call for immediate action. We see today that Martin Luther King Jr’s “I Have a Dream” speech is revolutionary, but it also took place on the National Mall. The Mall symbolizes protest and it also acknowledges the great people who have stood for this country, such as George Washington and Abraham Lincoln.
Civil War Monuments The Confederate monuments from the Civil War in many cities, colleges, and universities are being asked to be taken down. The monuments are causing problems between the U.S. citizens. Many people are protesting and saying that the monuments are a symbol of racism, and symbolism of traitors to the U.S., and are used to show white supremacy. These monuments should be taken down from the public but they should not be destroyed.
The minority claim the statues represent honoring white
In the news today, a continual debate can be found about the significance of Confederate monuments and if they should remain or be removed. Confederate monuments that have been erected throughout the U.S. should be kept because of the preservation of America’s history. For instance, in the article, The Unbearable Lightness of Confederate-Statue Removal, the author lists how slaveholder monuments aren’t the only statues being vandalized, but the Lincoln Memorial and Mount Rushmore are other symbols of U.S. history that some believe need to “blow up” (Murdock). Every historical symbol can have both people who appreciate it and who oppose it. That doesn’t mean that we should tear down all symbols, but
The first strategy the statue employes is logic. The logic is seen all over the statue from its broken shackles to the island it sits on, everything is very logical and thought out. The broken shackles represent “freedom and the abolishing of slavery” (Source A) because this statue was given to the “United States by France as a gift” (Source A) after the Revolutionary War, as a result of this war, as also seen by the broken shackles, slavery was abolished and slaves earned their freedom. Freedom is also represented in another way by the statue. As boats come into New York Harbor the first thing they see is “Liberty Island”
Should monuments be removed? For many years people have been arguing whether certain controversial monuments, such as statues, should be destroyed or removed. A common type of monuments in this situation are the Confederacy monuments. These are various statues across the US which honor Confederate leaders or “heroes”. Many see these offensive since those people basically oppressed African Americans for years and were fighting to keep doing so.
As Ralph Waldo Emerson has stated, “great achievements build a monument which shall endure,” implying that monuments and memorials are important because they offer a method of recognizing and celebrating notable figures’ accomplishments. However, there are many complications that need to be addressed when constructing memorials and monuments that people do not realize. Agencies that construct memorials need to take into account the demands of various people in order to satisfy their concerns. Once the agencies can establish a plan for a monument that has a neutral position, they should begin to create them. Agencies should think about the significance, controversy, location, and the emotional connection when constructing a monument or memorial.
In the story Grandpa & the statue the recurring theme is that people take the statue of liberty for granted we see this theme represented in the character of grandpa monaghan throughout the play the grandpa takes the stance that the statue of was a waste of money and did not represent liberty in fact he believed it did represent anything grandpa monaghan eventually convinced child monaghan of his beliefs caused him to also not believe in the statue of liberty this sentiment of the statue of liberty not being much but a big statue in the middle of the water is something that is shared by many now in recent years simply because we never see how it truly benefits others. Now more than ever in 2017 are we aware and tuned into our political
Why doesn’t certain statutes get the same recognition as the main and attention as bigger memorials. Some memorials get more attention than others Americans find the making of large national monuments would stand out more than the smaller memorials. Argument, however, is without political meanings, and when the public space in question is the National Mall the political meanings are amplified. In many cases, these aesthetic arguments echo, and are perhaps proxies for, political arguments. The belief, expressed by many critics, that the memorial should not be where it is, that it destroys the integrity of the open mall, impedes vistas and disrupts the flow of space, can be read as basic resistance to filling open space with meaning.