Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston massacre summary
The boston massacre summary
The boston massacre summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The boston massacre summary
The boston massacre summary
The boston massacre summary
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The boston massacre summary
Colonist Perspective On the evening of March 5, 1770, five innocent civilians were brutally murdered in the streets of Boston at the hands of corrupt British Red Coats. Our brothers and sisters, we peacefully protesting the corrupt, British imposed taxation without our representation. Among those whose lives were taken was Crispus Attucks, a former Black slave. The brutality expressed by the British is foreshadowing for more restrictions and intervention to come. The only way we can defeat British corruption is by coming together as one under this pertinent cause.
One thing lead to another and in 1770 the troops fired on the crowd as they feared for their lives, 5 colonists were killed and this tragic occurrence became marked down in history as the Boston Massacre. (doc 2) although this occurrence outraged the colonists they still weren’t looking to break away from the crown. However once the tea act was passed colonists were infuriated. A large group of colonists banded together, dressed up as native americans and went on to British ships containing tea and they threw the tea into the Boston harbor.
The Declaratory Act was passed by the British parliament immediately after the Stamp Act was repealed. It did not require anything from the colonists except an understanding of their subordinate role to the British crown. It was designed for the relationship of Britain and America. The Townshend Act were a series of acts passed by the Parliament of Great Britain relating to the Britain colonies in North America.
On March 5 1770, a street fight occurred between British soldier and a crowd of colonist, assembler at the custom house in Boston and started insulting the British soldier who was guarding the building; Those colonist where protesting because of the occupation of their city by the British troops sent there in Boston to authorize a taxation measure passed by the British parliament and needed American representation, and also call a Townshend Acts. While colonist was protesting outside the building, the British captain and commanding officer Thomas Preston, requested his soldier to settle their bayonets and join the other guar outside the building. The colonists reacted be tossing snowballs and different items at the British regular, and private
In 1765, the Stamp Act was placed on colonists, which placed a tax on many types of printed materials. As a result of the sudden tax placement, almost all of the free colonists were furious and began to riot. Groups such as the Loyal Nine opposed the Stamp Act and expressed their anger through violence. English colonists were determined to have freedom since they believed that the Stamp Act imposed by Great Britain “violated their liberty” (Foner, 179). The determination to achieve colonial liberty established a huge divide between the colonists and Great Britain.
Edward Buckley here reporting live from Boston where a massacre has just outbroke. British troops were sent in to maintain order of the colonist. The colonist didn't seem to be too happy about that. Large groups of angry colonist came together and began taunting the British soldiers. Along with the taunting, the colonist began throwing snowballs and showing hostile actions towards the British soldiers.
The town of Boston had been uneasy even before the “Massacre”. Tension had been building up since the early 1760s because the town was affected by the forces of migration and change. With the new slate of taxes known as the Townshend Duties, people like Samuel Adams encouraged the townspeople to increase their remonstrates. In
In dire need of paying off war debt, the British Parliament decided to tax the colonists due to the debt being their fault. Along with taxing the colonists, the East India Company boosted the income for the Parliament and benefited the George III by hurting the colonists economically by enacting the tea act. Blending “lethal politics, personalities, and economics”3 the American Revolution was bound to happen between the colonists and British, having little supporters of the idea of war. With the tension build up between the colonists and British Parliament, the Boston Tea Party occurred with the colonists rebelling against the Parliament’s political decision towards the colonists, symbolizing the starting point for a revolution and a step
They shouted, “No taxation without Representation!” The Boston Massacre and The Boston Tea Party angered the colonists and the king. This caused trouble between the Patriots and the British which led to the American Revolution. To start with, The Boston Massacre was just
The king punished Boston for their act of rebellion with Coercive Acts These acts closed the Boston Harbor and forced colonists to house redcoats and feed them. The colonists called these acts the “Intolerable Acts”. Colonists were astounded, but also enraged that the king had begun to
Lexington and Concord Responding to the Boston Tea Party in 1774, the Parliament of Great Britain implemented a series of laws and regulations known as the Coercive Acts/Intolerable Acts over the colony of Massachusetts. These Acts took away many of the rights that the colonists believed they should have under British law. One of the Acts that probably caused the greatest tension between Patriots and Loyalist was the Massachusetts Government Act. British Parliament wanted to control and assert authority over Massachusetts, by taking away their political rights. Although the Intolerable Acts were meant to cause fear throughout the colonies and ostracize Massachusetts, these Acts sparked greater distrust towards Great Britain and caused colonies
Eventually, the government was able to form a militia and end the rebellion, but as we can see, having virtuous and politically involved citizens was not enough to prevent this tragedy. Without any power, the government couldn’t stop Massachusetts from creating a new and unfair law or from creating money to pay its promised war
The Boston Massacre or “Bloody Massacre”, was probably the most infuriating to the colonies. Because according to History.com “A squad of British soldiers, come to support a sentry who was being pressed by a heckling, snowballing crowd, let loose a volley of shots. Three persons were killed immediately and two died later of their wounds”. Again according to History.com “In an effort to demonstrate the impartiality of colonial courts, two Patriot leaders, John Adams and Josiah Quincy, volunteered to defend Captain Preston and his men. The prosecution produced little evidence, and Preston and six of the soldiers were acquitted, two soldiers were found guilty of manslaughter, branded on the hand, and released”.
Taking care of an army that was unnecessary and not welcome was considered taxation without representation and an important grievance. This act was a violation of the principle that government derives its just powers from the consent of the people. Being under the watchful eye of the British antagonized feelings of insubordination and mistrust. This common mistrust led to the Boston Massacre, where troops sent to intimidate the people fired upon civilians
As a result of the widespread protests against the Townshend Acts, one thousand redcoats were dispatched to Boston so that they could ease the unrest. These soldiers were underpaid, as such they searched for part-time jobs from the populace often requesting lower wages. These actions caused the populace of Boston to hate the redcoats, the redcoats likewise began to hate the colonials. Insults and tensions raised steadily for two years and the city seemed ripe for revolt. Eventually on March 5, 1770, a mob of protesters surrounded a lone British sentry on King street, who promptly cried for assistance.