Literature frequently shows the deep understanding of human nature and the society dynamics that are often hidden in the logical versus traditional beliefs. In The Murders at the Rue Morgue and The Lottery by Shirley Jackson, this battle is revealed by different narratives. Poe tells about Dupin, who uses logic and reasoning to solve difficult enigmas in order to demonstrate his intelligence, whereas in Jackson’s case people just follow tradition. Moreover, the contrast between Dupin’s rational approach and the villagers’ traditional beliefs underscores that rationality leads to true understanding and equality, whereas its absence results in atrocities and loss of humanity. The sharp difference amid Dupin’s system and methodical reasoning with the villagers’ unthoughtful …show more content…
Auguste Dupin, who uses logical analysis and reason to solve otherwise unsolvable mysteries and brutal murders. Dupin’s methodical approach contrasts with the chaos of the crime scene, highlighting the power of human intellect to impose order and clarity. His reasoning process is meticulous and based on evidence that was observed, such as the clues left at the scene and the testimonies of witnesses, which he dissects. This portrayal of the use of reason underscores the ideal of rational thought to uncover the truth. Conversely, in The Lottery, reason is conspicuously absent in the villagers’ blind adherence to tradition. The villagers prefer to conform to old beliefs blindly than think of what they are doing, and that is why they keep on making the same mistakes. In conclusion, Murders in the Rue Morgue follows a protagonist named Dupin who makes sense of things in a systematic manner by solving what looks like an impossible crime using logic as well as careful analysis of evidence, while The Lottery highlights the use of reason in emphasizing a community that carries out a heinous rite without interrogating why and how it