ipl-logo

What Issue Or Issues Precipitate The Constitutional Convention In 1787

1119 Words5 Pages

The government was created by the people and for the people, so the people are the ones who have sovereignty in the US. The Preamble states “We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union… do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.” The Declaration of Independence supports this by saying the people are entitled to three basic rights; life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. If the government tries to dishonor these basic rights then the people have the power to abolish that government.

4. What was the name of the first constitution of the United States? Name at least two ways in which in it was different from the current constitution and at least two ways in which it was the …show more content…

What issue or issues precipitated the Constitutional Convention in 1787? What were the delegates empowered to do? What did they do? In your opinion, is the Constitution of 1787 legitimate? In your opinion, how should the Americans have responded to the proposed constitution in 1788?
The issues that precipitated the Constitutional Convention were the fact that “ … the framers sought to create a new government capable of promoting commerce and protecting property from radical state legislatures and populist forces hostile to the interests of the commercial and propertied classes.” The delegates were empowered to revise the Articles to meet the country’s needs, but they took it into their own hands and created an entirely new constitution. In my opinion, the Constitution of 1787 was legitimate in the social sense but was not legitimate by legal standards. The only reason that this new constitution was accepted was because it was what the United States needed at the time so the majority of the citizens agreed upon keeping it. I feel how the Americans responded to the proposed constitution in 1788 was correct because with any proposal comes people who agree and people who disagree, but they overcame their disagreements by compromising with the Bill of …show more content…

Do you see any points of agreement, either implicit or explicit, between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution? Please explain your answer. If you don’t see points of agreement, then explain how the two documents disagree or create confusion.
The main point of agreement between the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution is that they both are linked to the theory of natural law. The Declaration of Independence says “they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.” The unalienable rights that this excerpt is talking about are derived from John Locke’s theory of natural law that says no man should have their life, liberty, or property taken from them. The Constitution makes sure the government absolutely protects our natural rights, because if it doesn’t, it will be abolished by the people of the United States if they feel that it’s

Show More
Related
867 Words | 4 Pages

In the late 1700’s, it was America’s goal to create a republic that had a representative government that was based upon the approval of the people. Unfortunately, the people feared a strong central government because of the previous trouble the colonies had when they were ruled by Britain. They were always being unfairly taxed and had very few rights. In order to avoid this, a very weak government was developed that seemed to satisfy the people, but would not satisfy the well being of the country. It wasn’t until Shay’s rebellion which brought light to the fact that the Articles of Confederation were not going to cut it, so the Constitutional Convention was created and convened to find an alternative solution which was the creation of the Constitution.

Read More
827 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitution of the United States was written in 1787, but there was a grapple for its ratification that went on until about two decades after the ratification. Members of Congress believed that the first government of the United States or the Articles of Confederation, needed to be adjusted while others did not want anything to change. After the Revolutionary War, the people did not want a strong central government, because it reminded them too much of what they were trying to escape from. Under the Articles, each state had their own laws, and the need for a new Constitution was desired by many. The Constitution of 1787 created huge debates, arguments and splits in the nation that lasted for several year after its ratification between people who

Read More
790 Words | 4 Pages

The debate over the Constitution created much tension throughout the new country. From problems with the Articles of Confederation, western expansion, Shay’s rebellion, problem’s at the Constitutional Convention, slave trade, and the start of the War of 1812 all created tensions over the Constitution but nothing that the greats minds of the time couldn’t handle. Initially, the Articles of Confederation were the first written constitution of the United States, drafted in 1777 and ratified four years later by Congress (Lecture). The Articles of Confederation provided for a government by a national legislature but left the crucial power of monies, as well as all final power to make and execute laws, entirely to the states (US: A Narrative History,

Read More
372 Words | 2 Pages

The Constitutional Convention in 1787 held many problems however, they were resolved. The Constitutional Convention had two questions. How would they strengthen the national government without taking any power from the states? and, How would they balance the interests of both the wealthy and those that aren’t wealthy? 55 men agreed to make a compromise, and therefore the Constitution became a bundle of compromises.

Read More
959 Words | 4 Pages

(Document 1) Even our 1st president said that the Articles of Confederation were garbage. He added that “We have probably had too good an opinion of human nature in forming our confederation.” Which meant that they were being too nice when creating the government, which would lead to a atrocious layout of the country. But as a response for all the criticism about the Constitution, the Massachusetts Constitutional Ratification Convention, held in 1788, went

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

The question of why Americans supported or feared the Constitution of 1787 is imperative for it provides further insight into the founding of the United States. The young republic of America had several reasons to strongly support or fear the Constitution of 1787. To many, it would provide stability, but to others, it would take away their individual rights. Those who supported the Constitution (generally the Federalists) felt it was enough—no need for a Bill of Rights. Those who feared the Constitution (generally the Antifederalists) demanded a Bill of Rights to protect citizens.

Read More
771 Words | 4 Pages

Many Americans found that the Confederation needed to be revised. In 1787, at the Constitutional Convention, a New Constitution was made, but not all agreed. Due to this, there was a major debate among many people. In my opinion, I think the New Constitution should be approved.

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Edwin Vu Professor Manny Ontiveros Political Science G180 8 September 2016 Description of Three Proposals On May 25, 1787, the Philadelphia Convention was held with the purpose to fix certain problems and weaknesses of the Articles of Confederation. For example, the Articles of Confederation lacked the power to tax and regulate trade which made it unable to maintain government functions and services and helped contribute the economic depressions that occurred during the 1780s. However, it became apparent to the delegates of the convention that modifying the Articles of Confederation would not be enough; it had to be scrapped completely and be replaced with a constitution that has a stronger federal government with greater powers like taxation.

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

1. The Constitution’s ratification process included arguments for and against ratification by Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. Describe and evaluate the arguments expressed by both of these groups. The arguments the Federalists used in support of the ratification of the Constitution include a decrease in strength and authority of the federal government under the currently designated Articles of Confederation (Bardes, Shelly, Schimdt, 2015, pp.

Read More
303 Words | 2 Pages

Declaration of Independence and the Declaration of the Rights of Man have many similarities some of their similarities are that they were both created by rebellious groups, they were both influenced by the Enlightenment ideas, they were both created by movements that started because of high and unfair tax, also each of declarations were upset and wanted to change high taxes, taxation without representation. Lastly each declaration had the same demands of freedom of speech, freedom of religion, fair and equal trial, fair and equal tax, 1 of 3 inalienable right, and redefined and reconstructed government. In the Declaration of Independence it states “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal” and with about a third

Read More
947 Words | 4 Pages

The assembling of the Constitution was a long and hardening process for the framers to take on their own during the summer of 1787. That being said nothing good is created without a little dispute. Although by the end of the Convention they had established the Constitution, there were still some unsettling ideas that needed to be set straight for the people. These deference's in ideals separated the United States people into the Federalist (supporting the ideas of the Constitution fully without any changes), and the Anti- Federalists (persons who wanted an established and undeniable writing that the rights and liberties of the people were secure among other things). These strains of the people were necessary in order for our Constitution to

Read More
844 Words | 4 Pages

The Constitutional Convention was a meeting held in Philadelphia in 1787 to frame the Constitution. During this convention, the thirteen original states or colonies were the first to ratify this document. Under the Articles of Confederation, many leaders believed that the central government did not have enough authority. Therefore, instead of amending the Articles of Confederation, delegates, from different states, drafted a new written document with rules and regulations for a new federal government. In this government, three branches of government were formed: legislative, judicial and executive.

Read More
211 Words | 1 Pages

Why was the Constitution a controversial document even as it was being written? Established in 1787 The Constitution was a controversial document because it was a document that could both solve the nation’s hardships and warped the Republican foundation. The Constitution on one hand would give the people a voice and the other would control the nation through a monarchy system. One of the controversies that arose from the creation of the Constitution was the question of management of commerce.

Read More
200 Words | 1 Pages

After the failure of the Articles of Confederation, numerous delegates met for a convention, now known as the Constitutional Convention in 1787. At first, the convention’s purpose was to fix the Articles of Confederation. But, the delegates ended up making a new document called the Constitution. This document set the base of the United States’ government, as it established various laws and basic needs for the government.

Read More
1002 Words | 5 Pages

John Locke was a philosopher and political scientist. He had many interests and produced a number of writings that influenced future leaders. One of these leaders was Thomas Jefferson, who was involved with the aid of America and the act gaining independence from Britain. The Declaration of Independence and Locke’s views on government contain many similar aspects. These ideas includes the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness (natural rights); the protection that is provided by the government for these rights; and the altering or abolishment of government if it fails to provide and protect the rights of the people.

Read More

More about What Issue Or Issues Precipitate The Constitutional Convention In 1787

Related Topics

Open Document