ipl-logo

What They Fought For Sparknotes

1999 Words8 Pages

In the book, What They Fought For by James McPherson, the topic is the motivation behind the soldiers that fought for the Confederates as well as the Union, along with their perception of slavery during the Civil War from 1861-1865. This work gives a plethora of diverse quotes from soldiers living in the deep south of Louisiana to up north in Massachusetts with everything in between, which makes it impossible to assign this book to one location. The author presents the thesis that both armies were composed of men who were able to read, and knew what they were fighting for. Ultimately, after reading the literature, I think the author achieved supporting his thesis with an abundance of facts and research. McPherson organized this piece …show more content…

The North suprised the South by fighting back, as the South thought they’d secede unopposed. The North fought because if they didn’t, they would end up losing their property, country, and freedom. Parallel to the South, they felt they were fighting to uphold what the founding fathers would want, which was to keep the Union together in their opinion. A soldier from Missouri said, “We fight for the blessings brought by the blood and treasure of our fathers.” (p.28) This theme of sacrifice and determination found in the Confederate’s letters are also seen abundantly in the Union’s letters. In fact, 67% of Unionists expressed patriotic convictions while only 66% of Confederate soldiers did the same. The northerners were convinced that if they left the South alone, it would result in the representative government coming to an end. To them, secession was a deadly challenge to the foundation of the United States of law and order. If this was destroyed, anarchy and despotism were sure to ensue. It is easy to be skeptical of the Union’s convictions but the letters from two Quaker brothers solidify the North’s argument. These brothers are an example of ideological convictions overcoming pacifism. One brother said, “If I die for cause of Unity of this government, that is the way a man should die.” (p.34) The attitude the Quaker brothers had is a good representation of how thousands of other Union soldiers felt when it came to the Civil War. One important difference to note between the Unionists and Confederates was that patriotic convictions were shared more evenly across class lines among Unionists. In short, Unionists and Confederates shared the same degree of patriotic convictions but the larger disproportion of officers in the Confederate letters skews the percentage upward. The lower classes of Confederates didn’t seem to

Show More
Related
176 Words | 1 Pages

In chapter one, Lincoln and Liberty, of Chandra Manning’s What This Cruel War Was Over, (2007), Manning explains that although there were many reasons for why a solider white or black, Union or Confederate, slavery was the ultimate cause of the Civil War. At first Manning lists all the reasons soldiers from certain backgrounds enlisted but then she shows how those reasons were connected to slavery or how slavery very quickly became the reason someone was fighting. She does this in order to show the reader that slavery affected everyone is some way or another and that is why it became the main cause of the war. I believe Manning is successful in showing the relation between slavery and the soldiers fighting for its continuation or its end. Manning

Read More
1004 Words | 5 Pages

What this Cruel War was Over: Chandra Manning Chandra Manning opens up her important book with a quote that states, " The fact that slavery is the sole undeniable cause of this infamous rebellion, that it is a war of, by, and for slavery, is as plain as the noon-day sun. "(p.3) This book is about what soldiers thought about slavery and what it has to do with the civil war. In 1862 the white southerners did not agree with the Wisconsin men on a lot of things but one thing they did agree on was that any man who believes that this is not a war for the freeing of blacks is either a fool or a liar. Getting to the question on how did white Union soldiers’ understanding of slavery change during the course of the war, well two years later black men

Read More
1077 Words | 5 Pages

Throughout Booth’s manhunt, the reader encounters many different Confederate supporters, and they discover how many people were actually loyal. As the book reads on pg. 23, “...Booth came into contact with sympathetic secret agents in Canada, New York City, Washington, D.C, Maryland, and Virginia.” Across the United States, so many people felt sympathetic towards the Confederates. It is a common misconception that the North and South were quite split on slavery, and that almost all of the North wanted slavery abolished while the South didn’t. Through reading this book, I, as well as anyone else who reads it, will discover the truth on how split the country was, and how major of a political and moral divide the issue of slavery was.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

In September 1862, a battle was fought in a small town in Maryland. More lives were lost than any other battle or war that the United States has ever experience before or since. This battle had no true winner but it did have consequeses that changed the course of the Civil War. In James M. McPherson’s book Crossroads of Freedom Antietam The Battle That Changed the Course of the Civil War, he shows how small events added up to lead to the Battle of Antietam and ultimately to the North winning the Civil War.

Read More
156 Words | 1 Pages

In chapter one of What They Fought For, I learned about the letters and diaries of the Confederate soldiers. The themes of the letters were home-sickness, lack of peace, and the defense of home against their invading enemy. The thought of soldiers fighting for their homes and being threatened by invaders, made them stronger when facing adversity. Many men expressed that they would rather die fighting for a cause, than dying without trying and this commitment showed patriotism. Throughout the letters, soldiers claimed their reason for fighting, was for the principles of Constitutional liberty and self-government.

Read More
370 Words | 2 Pages

Chapter One Q: How did Union Commanders and President Lincoln characterize the “Nature of the Rebellion?” In regards to the nature of the rebellion, many Northerners, Republicans, and Union Commanders strongly believed in the theory that the South had been hoodwinked into secession by a wealthy slaveholding handful of upper class men which they referred to as the Slave Power Conspiracy. In addition, Southerners didn’t have much of a choice in the decision to the leave the union and accepted it as a fait accompli engineered by their social betters. Moreover, President Lincoln stated that “it may be well doubted whether there is, today, a majority of the legally qualified voters of any State, in favor of disunion.”

Read More
1636 Words | 7 Pages

In the 1950s, Texas was at the forefront of two major, but very different civil rights movements—the African-American movement and the Mexican-American movement. Fighting Their Own Battles by Brian Behnken describes and compares the separate battles for rights of the two movements. People in Texas knew what was happening and newspapers reported about the different events that occurred throughout the 1950s. In hindsight, and with the help of Behnken’s book, one is able to see the subtle influences of both civil rights movements in the Texas newspapers. At the time however, these differences in strategy between the African-American and Mexican-American movements were not so easily understood.

Read More
997 Words | 4 Pages

Even though soldiers wanted to win the war for their side so badly, they wanted to see their enemy suffer just as badly, but possibly even more. A quote McPherson included from a soldier’s journal on page 153 reads, “’[We] will have an eye for eye and toth for toth…if I live, I will be revenged. Yes I will draw their blood and mutilate their dead bodies and help send their souls to hell.’” Even though there are many motives for why men fought in the Civil War, revenge was a shared motive for both sides that pushed men to their limits during the Civil War. Through McPherson’s use of soldiers’ diaries and letters, it is clear that revenge was an irrefutable motive for soldiers to fight and continue to fight until the

Read More
461 Words | 2 Pages

In “What They Fought For 1861-1865,” prize winning author James M. McPherson writes a conflicting non-subjected book that explores the major motivations of the men who enlisted and fought the Civil War. McPherson examines in a non-biased tone the reason why the men in gray and blue fought in the bloodiest war in American history. James M. McPherson discusses the significant characteristics of the theme and ideas of the book that explores ideology. Within the conflicting book, McPherson analyzes the major theme and idea of ideology or “what Civil War soldiers believed they were fighting for” (McPherson pg. 1). McPherson encounters the quarrel that many historians disagree upon: whether or not the soldiers during this war knew their intentions of fighting the war.

Read More
1533 Words | 7 Pages

While the popular image of the Confederacy, and indeed the Secessionist Southern States as a whole, are looked at as containing white populations uniformly supportive of the Confederate cause, the reality is more complex. As portrayed in Victims: A True Story of the Civil War and Free State of Jones there existed sizable pockets of dissent among the populace whom the Confederate government failed to convert to the cause. In places like the mountains of western North Carolina and southeastern Mississippi this led to desertion, passive resistance, and even outright armed rebellion which sapped Confederate resources that were needed to continue to fight the Union. Though this anti-Confederate feeling would often translate into support for the Union, this was not based on some inherent loyalty to the Federal government. As shown in Victims and Free State of Jones the disunity within the Confederacy stemmed from the failure of the Confederate government to get their non-slave holding lower classes to buy into the pro-slavery ideology of the nation, which was compounded by the lower classes bearing many of the harsh measures of the war including the draft and the

Read More
935 Words | 4 Pages

The Civil War remains one of the most devastating, horrific conflicts in American history. During this period of time, relationships with family and friends disintegrated as everyone decided whether they would side with the North’s cause, the South’s cause, or stay neutral. Men were being killed left and right, both on the Union and Confederate side; they urgently needed more men in their armies. In order to obtain a larger army, people must be persuaded that putting their lives on the line for this cause is what they truly want to do. Though that may seem like a rather arduous task, Alfred M. Green proved with his speech delivered to slaves in 1861 that persuasive words and tone is key.

Read More
1063 Words | 5 Pages

The living legacy of the United States Civil War is a complicated time in American history one finds difficult to describe. The ramification of the war prior, during and after still haunt the current citizens who call The States their home. Tony Horwitz’s book Confederates in the Attic: Dispatches from the Unfinished Civil War looks at the wide gap of discontent that still looms in the late 1990s. For some southerners, the Confederacy still lives on through reenactments, stories and beliefs. For others in the South, reminders the land was dedicated to the Confederacy spark hatred and spite.

Read More
1162 Words | 5 Pages

Harte’s Attack on Social Injustices In the realistic short story, “The Outcasts of Poker Flat” by Bret Harte, the social injustices are exposed. Harte wants to tell the world that the standards of society are dragging everyone down and making it impossible for people to live truly free.

Read More
1074 Words | 5 Pages

Perhaps no one were expecting the secession of eleven states and creation of Confederate States of America in 1861 would be the beginning of a civil war that lasts four years and takes so many lives. Although the election of President Lincoln and slavery could have been the causes of the Civil War, the soldiers’ motivation in enlisting themselves for this war; depending on the geographic location and the time of the enlistment, could vary and partially or even totally be something different. Considering soldiers’ motivations variety and changes based on location and time factors during the four year civil war, this paper by looking for clues in soldiers’ letters as a precious and reliable source, claims the “community pressure” as the dominant

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

‘Gone with the Wind’ is an American epic historical romance film produced in 1939. It was based on the 1936 Pulitzer – winning novel of Margaret Mitchell. The story is set in Clayton County, Georgia and Atlanta during the American Civil War in the 1860s. This period is also known as Reconstruction Era. Originally, the name of the novel is ‘Tomorrow is Another Day’, according to the sentence ending story.

Read More

More about What They Fought For Sparknotes

Open Document