ipl-logo

What Was Descartes Method Of Doubt?

1532 Words7 Pages

What is Descartes’ method of doubt? Can we use it to respond to the sceptic? In this essay I argue that Descartes failed, in the Meditations on first philosophy (Clarke, 1998) to demonstrate the rule of 'clear and distinct perception' for the reason that the argument supporting this assertion is fallacious. Before discussing this specific argument, I will describe Descartes’ project, detailing what the method of doubt is and showing how it is a response to the sceptic. The sceptical challenge consists in the idea that humans cannot acquire knowledge at all, and everything we think we know is doubtful. It typically argues that truth is not a notion that humans can access, or that if something were to be true it could not be known. A …show more content…

This method is special in that, while it accepts to engage into the sceptical argument, it is also used as a means to find truths. Thereby working to prove the sceptics wrong in their claim that there can be no knowledge. The apparent aim of Descartes’ in the Meditations (chapters) was to persuade everyone including the sceptic of certain things such as God’s existence. In order to meet this purpose, the method needed to obey strict laws that would leave no ground for the sceptic to object. The method is meant to identify ideas that can be trusted, using the absence of doubt as a criterion. Wilson referred to the method as a "selective filter" (2003, p. 35) separating ideas into two categories. Wilson called them the "TRUE/BELIEVE" and "FALSE/DOUBT boxes" (2003, p.42). Ideas are scrutinised and can be believed if and only if no doubt is found in them. The meditator (narrator) hopes to reconstruct his whole set of belief, removing doubt from …show more content…

In the third meditation, Descartes argues “(1) I am certain that I am a thinking thing. (2) Do I not therefore also know what is required in order for me to be certain of anything, namely, that there is nothing in this first thought other than a certain clear and distinct perception of what I claim. (3) Evidently that would not be enough to make me certain about something if it could ever happen that what I perceived clearly and distinctly in this way could be false. (4) It seems, therefore, that I could establish as a general rule that everything that I perceive very clearly and distinctly is true.” (Clarke, 1998,

Show More
Related

Ucor 132 Basic Philosophical Questions

1656 Words | 7 Pages

In what follows, I will argue that the meditator has adequate reasons to doubt everything he has come to experience

Read More

An Analysis Of René Descartes Mediations On First Philosophy

1654 Words | 7 Pages

However, Descartes is indeed certain of the fact that he is a thinking being, and that he exists. As a result of this argument, Descartes makes a conclusion that the things he perceives clearly and distinctly cannot be false, and are therefore true (Blanchette). This clear and distinct perception is an important component to the argument that Descartes makes in his fifth meditation for the existence of God. This paper explains Descartes ' proof of God 's existence from Descartes ' fifth meditation, Pierre Gassendi 's objection to this proof, and then offers the paper 's author 's opinion on both the proof and objection.

Read More

Descartes Non Deceive God Analysis

726 Words | 3 Pages

We know clear and distinct perceptions independently by God, and his existence provides us with a certainty we might not possess otherwise. However, another possible strategy would be to change Gods role in Descartes philosophy. Instead of seeing God as the validation of clear and distinct perceptions, rather see him as a safeguard against doubt. This strategy, however, is a problem since it re-constructs the Meditations – Philosophical work of Descartes –.This is because it would not be God, who is the ultimate foundation of knowledge, but the clear and distinct

Read More

Rene Descartes Meditation Summary

1509 Words | 7 Pages

MEDITATIONS ON FIRST PHILOSOPHY René Descartes Meditation I. Of The Things Of Which We May Doubt. QUESTION 1. What was Descartes’ reason for writing his “Meditations”? People hold many erroneous beliefs and accept them without doubts.

Read More

Essay On Desecrate's Book 'Discourse On The Method'

1532 Words | 7 Pages

Discourse on the method, by Desecrate is a famous philosophical book, which focuses on doubting, certainty and existence. In his book, Desecrate constantly shifts from doubting to certainty. Although Descartes believes that everything can be doubted he finds ways to became certain of his existence mainly through quote “Cogito, ergo sum”, which means, “I think, therefore I exist”. Despite this phrase is one of the best in the world, and many people rushed to Descartes says, I see that it doesn’t have much significance as people think, he did not come up with any thing new. We have different kind of people, which are divided into religious, atheists and lost people.

Read More

Descartes Third Meditation Analysis

1238 Words | 5 Pages

Having asserted with absolute certainty his existence, Descartes attempted to remove the basis for doubting, a deceiving God, by first classifying in the Third Meditation which category of thoughts would be susceptible to doubt. Descartes divided thoughts into three categories: imagery, volitions and judgments, of which the third category could be most erroneous since judgment could lead to false ideas, a problem which could be resolved by considering them different modes of thoughts. These ideas could be further divided into three categories - innate, produced by one or adventitious. The last category was of particular importance: in term of representation, these ideas conveyed different degree of objective reality with omnipotent deities

Read More

Rene Descartes 'Allegory Of The Cave'

562 Words | 3 Pages

For an example, rather than believing that a person is bad, someone can believe that a person is trusted. Epistemology which is knowledge, is the study of how a person obtains knowledge and how they asses and learns from that knowledge. Knowledge asks us, “how are suppose to know what we know?”.

Read More

Did Rene Descartes God Exist

924 Words | 4 Pages

René Descartes, a famed mathematician and philosopher, enacted a thought project where he applied radical doubt to everything in existence, including himself. He wrote a treatise about the experience, called “Meditations on First Philosophy”, of which there are six parts. After first establishing his own existence as a “thinking thing,” Descartes wonders about the existence of God (153). Descartes then follows to prove, through a series of arguments, that God exists, and that the existence of God merits the existence of a material world.

Read More

Descartes Method Of Doubt Analysis

508 Words | 3 Pages

Explain Descartes’ method of doubt. What is Descartes purpose in exercising this method? Descartes begins Meditation I by stating that in order for him to establish anything in the sciences that was constant, he would have to start from the foundations of all knowledge. By claiming this, he is adopting skepticism which is not him rejecting his beliefs, but doubting them.

Read More

Descartes Second Meditations

991 Words | 4 Pages

Descartes’ claim that he has a mind, which further proves his existence, is literally the first and only thing he is certain of. It appears odd to me that someone who read the First and Second Meditation would write an objection like Gassendi’s. By claiming we can infer our existence, indubitably, from any action, he is assuming that we know indubitably that we do engage in different actions. However, to the extent of the Second Meditation, Descartes has not even established he has a physical body. Thus, the claim that other actions can prove existence appears to me not only incorrect, but also oblivious.

Read More

The Influence Of René Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy

750 Words | 3 Pages

He then takes you through the thought process that led him to the one thing that lies beyond all doubt. He finds certainty in the statement Cogito, ergo sum or “I think, therefore I am.” FOOTNOT The first Meditation in Descartes Meditations On First Philosophy, is based on doubting almost everything he once believed as true. When Descartes found that beliefs he had were false, he realized all of his beliefs could be threatened.

Read More

Rene Descartes Meditations On Philosophy

319 Words | 2 Pages

In Rene Descartes meditations on Philosophy, he is seen constantly trying to question what he knows to be real or not. To settle the doubts that bother him, he tries to rid himself of all his pre-conceptions, hoping to rebuild what he does know from the ground up, determining what is absolutely certain, and what is still questionable. In the first meditation, Descartes reflects on all things false he had believed in his life. He goes through a process in which he separates himself from his senses and the world, so as not to be deceived.

Read More

Descartes Views On Meditation And The Existence Of God

487 Words | 2 Pages

Meditation one sums the doubts of everything (p.101) therefore Descartes realizes he must begin at the lowest step imaginable. Meditation two concentrates on the conclusion that the mind is the key to removing the doubts and concluding that “I am a thing that thinks, which doubts, understands, conceives, affirms, wills, refuses, imagines and feels” (p.104). This brings the act of thinking as the one point that is indisputably independent of externalities; therefore “I exist”. The four conclusions in meditation two all revolve around the conceptualization of thinking and how it proves one’s existence.

Read More

Compare And Contrast Descartes And Hume

1404 Words | 6 Pages

Descartes Epistemology: Descartes attempts to discover a foundation of knowledge as seen in his book ‘Meditations on First Philosophy’. He is essentially looking for total certainty. In order to do so, Descartes doubted everything, coming to the realization that he can only prove his

Read More

René Descartes 'Method Of Doubt'

1396 Words | 6 Pages

René Descartes was a 17th century mathematician and philosopher who was exceedingly intrigued about his own existence and the existence of everything he believed to be true and real. Descartes’ curiosity triggered him to discover the ultimate truth of reality. He was curious to learn if anything was true or false. Due to his curiosity, he created an intense experiment that reconstructs philosophy known as the Method of Doubt. He was highly aware that his senses were not reliable and can be deceived.

Read More

More about What Was Descartes Method Of Doubt?

Related Topics

Open Document