ipl-logo

What Were The Goals Of The Federalist Papers: Taxation

946 Words4 Pages

The Federalist Papers: Taxation The Federalist papers provided the reasons to support the (then) new plan of government characterized in the Constitution and replied to all critiques of the plan. The Federalist papers were analyzed on how creating a strong government would be harmful to liberty. What the critiquers were not understanding was that an active government is necessary to the survival of liberty. The Articles of Confederations plan did not completely protect these human liberties. The plan did not act significantly on the people and could not enforce its laws. In the pages to come I will describe what was the goal of the Federalist papers? Challenges of the Constitution and how the federalist papers addressed these challenges. Then I will discuss taxation and why the constitution was the best solution. The American people, "after an unequivocal experience of the inefficacy of the subsisting Federal Government,"(Hamilton, Federalists paper #1) weren’t called on to consider the creation of a new Constitution. It involved "nothing less than the existence of the UNION . . . the fate of an empire, in many respects, the most interesting in the world."(Hamilton, Federalist papers #1) A wrong decision in this matter would "deserve to be considered as the general misfortune of mankind."(Hamilton, Federalist paper #1) Expecting criticism …show more content…

“(Hamilton, Federalist paper

Show More
Related
975 Words | 4 Pages

In the early 19th century, the United States of America was still just a young nation trying to find its way. Two parties emerged as competitors for the people’s votes and the opportunity to enact their view of how the young government should be handled. On opposing sides were Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. The Federalist philosophy of Hamilton was less trusting of the common man and more valid for the time period given the state of the United States in the early 19th century than the Anti-Federalist views, divisive actions, and philosophy of a strict constitutional interpretation of Thomas Jefferson. Alexander Hamilton authored a great many of The Federalist Papers of the late 18th century.

Read More
1511 Words | 7 Pages

(1).” This group did not the Constitution did not properly state the rights and powers of the three branches of government, states’ rights, etc. In order to please the Anti-federalists, the Preamble was put into place to allow American citizens know the central government’s rights, and states’ rights. Lecture 15 “Questions to Consider #1”: In what ways does the modern American economy resemble the plan set out in Hamilton’s three great reports?

Read More
622 Words | 3 Pages

Since they were all for the new constitution, they wanted to go ahead and make it. But the Anti-federalists didn’t want this. They were hesitant on this new government. So, that is why the Federalist papers were created. These were a series of 85 essays that tried to convince Anti-Federalists to ratify the Constitution.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

The question of why Americans supported or feared the Constitution of 1787 is imperative for it provides further insight into the founding of the United States. The young republic of America had several reasons to strongly support or fear the Constitution of 1787. To many, it would provide stability, but to others, it would take away their individual rights. Those who supported the Constitution (generally the Federalists) felt it was enough—no need for a Bill of Rights. Those who feared the Constitution (generally the Antifederalists) demanded a Bill of Rights to protect citizens.

Read More
373 Words | 2 Pages

This week I read the Federalist No. 1 [Alexander Hamilton]. The purpose of the Federalist is to persuade reluctant New Yorkers to adopt the proposed new Constitution. In the Federalist No. 1, Hamilton mainly reveals the motivations and ambitions of a certain class of men who support separate confederacies and introduces the following papers he proposes to defend the Union. Since the Federalist is such popular collection of America, I start this week reading with great curiosity and passion.

Read More
585 Words | 3 Pages

Following the Revolutionary War, America had just gained independance from Great Britain and needed to form a new government. The Articles of Confederation were established as an attempt to create a government that was unlike Britain’s. Unfortunately, the Articles of Confederation had several weaknesses. When in the process of repairing those weaknesses, the Federalists and the Anti-federalists formed. The Articles of Confederation were very weak as well as useless to America and because of this, the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists could not agree on a new type of government.

Read More
682 Words | 3 Pages

Publius provides a convincing case for ratification by thoroughly addressing the Anti-Federalists’ two primary concerns including a potential consolidation of government, and the dangers of hastily ratifying the Constitution The Federal Farmer outlines his concerns with the following statements: “The plan proposed appears to be partly federal, but principally however, calculated ultimately to make the states one consolidated government. The first interesting question, therefore suggested, is, how far the states can be consolidated into one entire government on free principles” (111). This would manifest in blurred lines between the three branches of government.

Read More
319 Words | 2 Pages

1. The Constitution’s ratification process included arguments for and against ratification by Federalists and Anti-Federalists, respectively. Describe and evaluate the arguments expressed by both of these groups. The arguments the Federalists used in support of the ratification of the Constitution include a decrease in strength and authority of the federal government under the currently designated Articles of Confederation (Bardes, Shelly, Schimdt, 2015, pp.

Read More
978 Words | 4 Pages

The Federalist No. 10” is a persuasive argument written by James Madison in an attempt to ratify the Constitution. He wrote a series of documents called the Federalist Papers under a pseudonym to convince others to approve of the Constitution. He says that factions are not good for America, neither is a pure democracy. Madison provides extensive arguments and remedies for the problems he is addressing. James Madison is attempting to ratify the Constitution by analyzing the way to deal with factions, comparing a republic to a democracy, and by comparing a small government to a large government.

Read More
686 Words | 3 Pages

The Federalist Papers came at a time of uncertainty in America. Having just broken away from the overbearing British, Americans were reluctant to give much power at all to their newly independent government. Under the Articles of Confederation, the first written constitution of the young nation, the federal government lacked the power to intervene in trouble within the states. One issue that soon arose after the inception of the Confederation was that of taxation. With debt rising and the need for resources increasing with it, the federal government was simply not getting enough money to continue functioning.

Read More
932 Words | 4 Pages

This document (the Federalist) will provide all the reasons to support the new plan of government described in the U.S. Constitution, and responses to each of the criticisms of the plan. Opponents to the new plan criticize it most on it creating a strong central government that will be abusive to individual liberty. However, an energetic government is crucial to the protection of individual liberty. The plan of government under the Articles of Confederation was unable to effectively protect individual liberties because it did not act directly upon the people, and had no authority to enforce its laws.

Read More
584 Words | 3 Pages

Also deTo defend the Federalist position on the constitution the Federalist wrote a document known as the Federalist papers. The central idea of the Papers was to give the central government “just enough power to benefit the country and keep it together (without a fony war), nut to oblige the representatives to stay within the bonds set by the document”. The Federalist predicted “people would eventually give away all the freedom they had fought for”. Madison argued with Patrick Henry’s firebrand objections to secure approval of the Constitution. Madisons wittiness and reasoning got him elected into the House of Representatives.

Read More
592 Words | 3 Pages

In this edition of the Federalist papers, Alexander Hamilton stresses over and over again the importance of unity between the states. Without unity, it seems as though our country will cease to exist as we know it. While Hamilton does not come right out and state, we need unity, he does make his point very clear. In using the Constitution as the perfect example of what the United States needed at the time, Hamilton manages to bring everything back to one central theme. We cannot have unity between the states if we do not introduce the Constitution.

Read More
1893 Words | 8 Pages

The Federalist party was comprised of Alexander Hamilton, John Jay, James Madison, George Washington, Charles C. Pinckney, DeWitt Clinton and Rufus King the paramount objective set by federalist Members was a fiscally sound and nationalistic government which promoted the system of checks and balances laid out in the US Constitution for the three branches of government. The federalist Party can be perceived as elitist, and its leaders scorned democracy, widespread suffrage, and open elections, however, the acceptance of these notions didn’t escape Ramifications as they lost the support of the general population due to their favoritism of the exclusive class group. The Federalists despite their invalidation etched a lasting legacy in America politics in the form of a strong federal government with a sound financial base and they decisively shaped Supreme Court policy for another three decades through the person of Chief Justice John

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Federalists The purpose of the government is to maintain and to organize citizen’s rights and prevent confusion in our country. The articles of confederation were absolutely no good for the united states because the congress had no control over taxation, there was no executive branch and no court system. The constitution should definitely be approved because it would help balance out our government between three branches and bring together our country under one leader. In order to keep our country from falling apart we need balance.

Read More

More about What Were The Goals Of The Federalist Papers: Taxation

Related Topics

Open Document