Had I been a delegate to the state convention, and I had to choose whether to ratify the Constitution or not, I would have chosen to support the ratification of the United States Constitution. Therefore, I would be a federalist at the time. Being a federalist, I would believe that America was in need of a strong central government, with less power to the individual states. Additionally, I would discourage local power and the states controlling the economy, as opposed to the nation handling it. One of a federalist’s beliefs includes a balance of the branches of government’s power, which is known as the checks and balances principle. Conclusively, as a self-proclaimed federalist, such principles of the Constitution were much-needed in the late …show more content…
Most supporters were wealthy and upper-class citizens; they also tended to be well-educated. One of the most significant points federalists believed in was the checks and balances principle. The checks and balances principle encouraged a stability of authority among the branches of government — legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislative branch had many responsibilities, but they are best known for making laws. Some examples of how the legislative branch can balance out the executive branch’s power are that they could declare war, override vetoes of the President, implement a tax, distribute funds from taxes, and authorize the replacement of the Vice President. To balance out the judicial branch’s power, the legislative branch could change the size of the Supreme Court, commence amendments of the Constitution, and declare inferiority of courts to the Supreme Court. Correspondingly, the executive had much power balancing the other branches’ command, but this branch is famous for executing laws made by the Legislature. Regarding the Legislature, the executive branch had the ability to temporarily suspend appointments, outlaw power, and declare adjournment if, in any case, other houses cannot decide on adjournment. Concerning the Judiciary, the executive branch could employ judges, and this branch also had the power to pardon some crimes. Finally, the Judiciary was also able to hinder the abuse of power of the other two branches of government, and the branch also interpreted the law. The judicial branch could use a judicial review on either of the two other branches. When the branch made checks on the Legislature, the Judiciary decided that seats on the legislative branch were appointed by respectful behavior. When the branch made checks on the executive branch, it was decided that, during an impeachment of the President, the Chief Justice acted as the