What Were The Social Causes Of Slave Rebellions In 1820-1860

516 Words3 Pages

Social: 1820- 1860 (Slavery) In 1820 to 1860, there were plenty of slave revolts and it was getting out of control. In 1820, Missouri wanted admission to the Union as a slave state, which would have disturbed the balance between slave and free states. For this to happen, the Missouri Compromise was needed. Since, their had to be a new state to balance out the slave and free states, Massachusetts offered Maine up as the new free state. The line that was dividing the slave and free states was the 36°30′, which crossed the Spanish and Arkansas Territory. After this line, it was clear to tell apart the states that were free and slave states. The states above the 36°30′ were free states and the states below it were slave states. As slave revolts began from the 1800s, there were plenty of slave rebellions. In 1822, the Vesey Revolt was supposed to occur, but didn’t. The important slave rebellion that occurred in August 1831, was led by Nat Turner. In February 1831, Nat Turner, told other slaves about his plan and gathered his African American slaves. Then, they went to fight a very bloody and unsuccessful revolt fought against the white people. The revolt had an end with murders, defeat, and the leader of this Nat Turner Rebellion, was killed. Along with Nat Turner being killed, the slaves that were in the rebellion were killed too. …show more content…

They said that it was their job to Christianize the slaves. Then, the Fifth Amendment made slavery legal and was for slavery because slaves weren’t looked at as humans, they were looked at as

More about What Were The Social Causes Of Slave Rebellions In 1820-1860