Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
Autonomy and patient rights essay
Medical principle of autonomy
Respect for patient autonomy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Autonomy and patient rights essay
Medical principle of autonomy
Respect for patient autonomy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Autonomy and patient rights essay
Patient Privacy and Consent Hinders Medical Advancements In the medical world, many disagreements revolve around the idea of patient privacy and consent. Some say it is an unethical act to not inform a patient on research that will be done on their cells. I say without informing the patient and avoiding possible risks of not being able to conduct life-saving research, many discoveries would be made. Consent for certain things would hinder advancements, and create a gap in medical development and progress that could possibly save someone’s life.
Privacy is of the utmost importance within a medical practice, ethically a patient’s privacy is very important as a medical record contains information regarding a patient’s health. According to
In Joseph Collins article, “Should Doctors Tell the Truth?” he states that doctors shouldn’t tell the truth to their patients that deals with their life and death. Collins argued that doctor should withhold the truth on any circumstances. For example, when Collins blamed himself because of the death of a lawyer who suffered from kidney disease, only if he had lied to the lawyer about his health issue, the lawyer still could have been alive. However, I believe that doctors should always tell the truth to their patients regardless of the circumstances because withholding information violates patient’s autonomy and harms the doctor-patient relationship.
I respectfully disagree with you. In your post you stated “I believe that as a nurse I might have more knowledge of what is best for the health of the patient.” I don’t believe that a medical professional always “has more knowledge [or always knows] what is best for the health of the patient”. The Josie King story is a good example of the nurse thinking she “had more knowledge” and knew what was best for the patient. Mrs. King questioned the nurses several times throughout the care of her daughter, and if a nurse had listened to her, we might not be having this discussion today.
If the patient were to die during surgery or procedures, the physicians would not be held accountable if the patient signs the consent form stating they were aware of the risks to their care. It’s important for the patient to ask any questions if they are confused on any information that was given to them. Even though, if the patient is diagnosed with a life-threatening disease or infection they have the right to refuse from signing the consent form. Since the patient is legally competent to make their own decisions that regard their health, they can still disregard any treatments that are being done to them. In most cases, doctors that perform experiments on the patient without their knowledge and without their consent is known as unethical human experiment.
Theses steps are imperative to maintaining the patient’s privacy. When disclosing
Similarly, all clinicians need to gain consent from nearly every patient, either verbal or non-verbal, unless in an immediately life-threatening condition. To refuse consent, a patient has to have all information presented to them by the clinician including; the risks they may face, other alternatives to the initial treatment plan and likelihood of success (SCAS, 2016, 5.3). Consent given by a patient under unfair pressure from a friend/family member or clinician, is not considered consent as it is not the patient’s decision. If a valid consent has been given, then a patient is entitled to withdraw their consent at any time. If a patient lacks capacity to give consent, and has no nominated person with Lasting Powers of Attorney, then no one can give consent on their behalf (SCAS, 2016,
Electronic Health Records and Patient Confidentiality Technology has become an essential part of our everyday life therefore, it makes sense that doctors and hospitals get rid of the old fashioned paper charting and use technology to access patient records. Electronic health records (EHR) provide quick access to information, as doctors no longer have to wait for other providers to fax previous records to them. The accessibility of Electronic Health Records assist medical providers to make quick medical care decisions, by accessing previous care provided to patients including treatment and diagnosis. Quick access to information through EHR enables health care providers to treat patients faster as there is no need for records to be mailed or
If a patient does not wish to share a medical problem with their family or anyone else then they have the right to patient confidentiality. When administering medication, it helps if the doctor has the patients full health records, this helps determine which medicines are best for that particular person, and this will also help the doctor to understand if the patient has an allergy to any type of
Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act established in 1996 sets standards for health care information. These laws protect patient’s sensitive health information. The purpose of this discussion is to review a former UCLA employee’s HIPAA violation. Additionally, HIPAA laws and penalties for violation up for examination. Ending this discussion with the possible charges that the employee may receive.
Ms. Lewis was referred by Maricopa county correctional health services to receive an evaluation for potential to transfer to the mental health unit. She was serving a 10-year sentence for manufacturing and possession of illegal substances. She had served 1-year of her sentence and reported symptoms of anxiety, obsessive rumination, and sleep disturbances. Notification of Purpose and Limits of Confidentiality Upon arriving for her appointment, the Informed Consent and confidentiality agreement was discussed both verbally and in writing with Ms. Lewis. The purpose of evaluation was reviewed along with mandated reporting laws and danger to self (DTS) and danger to others (DTO).
One may disagree with these reasons, however, and say that it is not justifiable for a doctor to withhold information from their minor patient in any case. For example, children may hear whispering or talk surrounding them and know that a secret is being kept. According to Cole & Kurdish (2013), research shows that “withholding information may result in the child’s imagining a worse scenario or a least a different scenario.” This imagined situation could then create the same anxiety and depression that withholding the information was intending to prevent. Also by withholding the diagnosis, the child is prevented from participating in therapeutic resources such as support groups or cognitive therapy that could help them cope with the disease much more completely and quickly than a child who has been denied access to these resources.
During Richard Branson’s childhood, he struggled tremendously with school. Branson’s dyslexia caused him to nearly fail out of Scaircliffe School, at the age of 13. In an effort to help, Branson transferred to a new boarding school in Buckinghamshire, England: Stowe School. While attending Stowe School the headmaster told Branson he would “either end up in prison or a millionaire,” little did he know how accurate this statement would be. (Stone, 2014)
The Singapore Nursing Board (SNB) Code of Ethics and Professional Conduct states that confidentiality means to protect the privacy of clients’ personal information (SNB, 2014). According to Lockwood (2005), confidentiality could be viewed as information that a doctor learns about a
Everything in the realm of medicine deals with the topic of confidentiality. The medical definition of confidentiality is, “The right of