For centuries our ancestors have found a way to slander innocent people. In ¨Apology Plato's¨socrates was falsely accused of the following: 1)Being nosey 2)Teaching others bad behavior 3)Charging money to teach.However, he did no such thing all he did was go on a godly quest to find out the truth.Socrates is innocent because all he did was tell the truth and all he´s done is follow orders from the god. I picked this conclusion because throughout the text the people (Athenians) would slander him. All Socrates has done is tell the truth.This can be seen in line 40 of ¨The Apology¨ when he states ¨And then I tried to show that while he thought he was wise,he was no such thing.But that just turned him and many of those with me against me.¨In this line Socrates is seeing the expression of a person when they hear what they didn't want to hear,the truth. So they are mad, which is our natural response to when someone tells us something we don't wanna hear.This piece of evidence is relevant to the claim because it shows how when Socrates tried …show more content…
Socrates is innocent because someone will be mad at the truth and all he’s done is follow orders from the God.People should treat each other as equals.Socrates is innocent and shouldn’t have been convicted for something he didn’t