ipl-logo

Where To Find Human Flaws In Nonmoral Nature By Stephen Gould

777 Words4 Pages

Where to Find Human Flaws
What are the flaws of humans, and where do we find them? Many researchers like Charles Darwin struggle with this question. Their research runs on the basis of genetics, evolution, and the fact that nature lives in its own independent state-unrelated to foolish humans. However, many natural theologians believe God creates everything for a purpose so why does evil rear its ugly head in nature and in humans? According to Darwin’s logic evil helps humans survive, while natural theologians believe evil obtains a greater purpose; natural theologians conclude God is moral and benevolent so the evil in nature and humans must be moral as well. Throughout “Nonmoral Nature” by Stephen Gould these two sides dispute about evils …show more content…

Natural theologians rely on God as a scapegoat for eveything that happens in our world. When humans commit an uninmaginably evil act, they look at God to find the morality in the situation. A situation of evil in nature recalls the glorified “ichneumon flies.” Gould works in a continuous metaphor of humans to the “ichneumons” as he explains in paragraph 3 they represent habits of an enormous tribe-humans. Gould portrays “The ichneuomon, like most wasp, generally live freely as adults but pass their larva life as parasites feeding on the bodies of other animals, almost invariably members if their own phylum, the Arthropoda” (Paragraph 4). Gould utilises exemplification of “ichneumon fles” to illustrate a major habit of selfishness within humans. Not only do “ichneumons” kill other living animals, they feed “on the bodies.” Larva feed on the other animals so that they themselves grow big and flourish in nature, while the victim withers away with each bite taken from the wasp. Humans according to Gould do the same in society just as the “ichneumons” do with their victims. Natural theologians face upward, as opposed to looking at themselves, to try and find a happy ending in these …show more content…

However, this troubling mindset alters when Gould uses an anecdote of when “The Reverend William Kirby, rector of Barham, and Britain’s foremost entomologist, chose to ignore the plight of caterpillars and focused instead upon the virtue of mother love displayed by wasps in provisioning their young with such care” (Paragraph 17). Gould exhibits Reverend Kirby ignores creulty to focus on “the virtue of mother love.” Selfishly turning a blind eye to evil, as so many humans do, invites more space to obsess over love an animal uses during a murder of another being. As one species flourishes exceptionally in nature one group diminishes into the background noise. Natural theologians find a reason for creulty and they are able to believe in God and his values. Even so, what’s at stake if people decide caring for young trumps the plight of ceterpillars? Humans choose themselves and society begins to crumble with every action of ingorant

Show More
Related
767 Words | 4 Pages

We are all familiar with the notion of “pleasure.” Simple pleasures are ever-present in our lives but complex, extended pleasures are fulfilling yet fleeting. They bring about intense experiences to gratify our desires, although they are not a necessity, in the same way slaughtering and plating an overhunted species is not absolutely imperative. However, despite my own belief that an endangered species is not to be poached upon, I commend Liz Alderman for completing “Chefs Fight for Songbird” in a way in which she successfully set key points from both sides of the arguments while also discreetly and strategically establishing and backing her own position in the feud. For those completely unfamiliar with the topic, Alderman might be able to

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

Foremost, Carson evokes pity towards the defenseless birds, and anger toward the farmers for their actions, with emotionally-charged words. The repetition of the word “killing” supports Carson belief that the destruction of birds is savage path farmers choose, because the word connotes evil. The evil, associated with the word, arouses anger at the farmers for their ill doing; additionally, the word

Read More
822 Words | 4 Pages

“To be human is to be beautifully flawed. ”(Eric Wilson). All humans are flawed. That is what makes them human. Flaws sometimes are hurtful, but they make the character interesting.

Read More
782 Words | 4 Pages

In this paper, I will focus on Bonnie Steinbock’s claim on whether or not we should give equal moral consideration to species outside our own species group. I will first determine what moral concern means, according to Peter singer, and explain how he views the human treatment of animals. I will then outline Steinbock’s argument against Singer’s position and explain how her criticism is part of a much broader issue: that is moral concern. I will finally make my argument against Steinbock as well as address any issues she could possibly raise against my argument. Peter Singer believed that all species, whether it be human or non-human, deserve equal consideration of interests and quality of life.

Read More
813 Words | 4 Pages

While returning to his first arguments about how critics often argue that hunting is immoral because it requires intentionally inflicting harm on innocent creatures. Even people who are not comfortable should acknowledge that many animals have the capacity to suffer. If it is wrong to inflict unwanted pain or death on an animal, then it is wrong to hunt. Today it is hard to argue that human hunting is strictly necessary in the same way that hunting is necessary for animals. The objection from necessary harm holds that hunting is morally permissible only if it is necessary for the hunter’s survival.

Read More
460 Words | 2 Pages

What causes savagery behavior ? Biology can make people do bad things. It can cause savage and immoral behavior. Just like in the novel The Lord of the Flies. In the book, The Lord of the Flies, by William Golding, he writes about character who are kids whose plane has crashed on an island.

Read More
600 Words | 3 Pages

The differences between light and dark, good and bad, are blurred in the Iroquois Creation Story. The narrator captured two different views in this story, blurring the line between what is considered right and wrong. The Iroquois Creation Story does not have just the black and white, but also the gray areas as well. It makes readers question what is really good and what is bad. The overall use of light elements gives the story a light feel, but also has a dark undertone when looked at closely.

Read More
497 Words | 2 Pages

According to Elizabeth Harman, an action that kills an animal even painlessly, is an action that harms the animal. If we indeed have strong moral reasons against causing pain to animals, Harman argues we must also have strong moral reasons against killing animals. This raises an objection to the Surprising Claim, which states that we have strong reasons against causing intense pain to animals, but only weak reasons against killing animals. The First View claims that killing an animal deprives it of a positive benefit (future life) but does not harm the animal.

Read More
436 Words | 2 Pages

In this reading reflection I will be discussing Richard Swinburne’s argument on “Why God Allows Evil” which starts on page 254 in “Exploring Philosophy: An Anthology” by Steven M. Cahn. This was also discussed in class on 9/15/16. In his argument Swinburne states that “An omnipotent God could have prevented this evil, and surely a perfectly good and omnipotent God would have done so. So why is there evil?”(Swinburne, 254).

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

The Lowest Animal by Mark Twain shatters the illusion that the human species is superior in every way to animals. The essay satirizes that animals are superior to the human species through the use of made up experiments. Twain utilizes these experiments to demonstrate the parallels between the behaviors of animals and man. These experiments showcase how animals are the “higher animals”. Even more, the experiments are attempting to prove how we, as man, have descended from these higher animals only to lose a few of their favorable traits.

Read More
1558 Words | 7 Pages

The introduction: In life, there are the cheerful people (optimistic) and there the frown faced ones (pessimistic). Taking one side remains illogic in the course of life, as it is better to strike a balance between these two extremes. Candide is torn between being naïve and a kind of lamb in the herd led by an optimistic Shepard, and his famous saying’ in this best of all possible worlds’. (Voltaire, 1761, p.4). And the shocking discoveries that he makes later on his journey to meet his beloved baroness.

Read More
732 Words | 3 Pages

In nature, predators inflict pain upon their prey through their actions. William Buckland, a theologian, argued that predation is necessary for reducing the inevitable suffering that victims would experience with old age and also to helps maintain population and food resources. Gould uses the predatory behavior of the ichneumon wasp to argue against this natural theological justification. He argues that the cruelty in which the parasitic ichneumon wasp implants it young into living prey contradicts this statement, comparing the event to that of medieval torture. He argues that natural theologians’ attempt to justify the actions of the ichneumon wasp by applying human emotions and intentions is

Read More
155 Words | 1 Pages

Human nature I believe is evil. This might sound a bit harsh in some ways but subsequently, Humans are definitely prone to do bad things. This feeling was also experienced by some philosophers that we have studied this year, Philosophers such as Thomas Hobbes believed that human nature is inherently tainted. He believed that people will act immorally based on the extent on their corrupted nature if left without order. This might explain why anarchy leads to higher amount of crime and bad deeds, because there is no controlling leader.

Read More
877 Words | 4 Pages

On the other hand, theists like Swinburne, believe that evil is necessary for important reasons such as that it helps us grow and improve. In this paper I will argue that the theist is right, because the good of the evil in this specific case on problems beyond one’s control, outweighs the bad that comes from it. I will begin by stating the objection the anti-theodicist gives for why it is wrong that there is a problem of evil. (<--fix) Regarding passive evil not caused by human action, the anti-theodicist claims that there is an issue with a creator, God, allowing a world to exist where evil things happen, which are not caused by human beings (180-181).

Read More
506 Words | 3 Pages

My adoration of Batman procures from his skills in unarmed combat, deductive reasoning and as a detective. Somewhere in my mind I admire his courage and persistence too. Batman is an embodiment of principle and restraint. Throughout his 75 year run as a character he has never killed any of his foes. We see him struggle with the decision to kill issue after issue, always considering the fact that killing The Joker would save hundreds of lives.

Read More

More about Where To Find Human Flaws In Nonmoral Nature By Stephen Gould

Related Topics

Open Document