ipl-logo

Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil

491 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Ethical dilemmas

The logical problem of evil is a problem between theists and atheist. Theists say that God is all-powerful (omnipotent), all-knowing (omniscient), and wholly good (morally perfect), while atheists say that there is a disagreement between the fact of evil and the idea that God is perfect and good. If God is all-powerful, all-knowing and wholly good, then why He doesn’t stop the evil from doing all bad things in this world? As a result, evil exist in this world, while God doesn’t exist. There is a difference between moral and natural evil. Moral evil is caused by people who make bad decisions in life includes slavery, crimes, fighting, suicides and others. Natural evil is not caused by human beings but by the nature includes tornadoes, …show more content…

According to Plantinga the free will means that a person is free to do any action and there are no laws or any settings to determine either that he will perform or not perform the action. He was trying to show that there is a possible world where both evil and good exists. God creates free creatures and those creatures could not be free if God creates them to do only the right things. Some free creatures used their freedom incorrectly and that’s why there is moral evil. That’s means there is a balance between the freedom of moral good and moral evil. Mackie didn’t agree with the free will defense. The objection was that if God creates free creatures that they can freely choose to take good or bad decisions, why He didn’t create creatures that live in the best possible world where they choose only to do good decisions where no moral evil exists? Mackie thinks that supporters of the free will defense must show that this world is the best possible world if God is omnipotent. He thinks that the free will defense is inconsistent with the idea that God is omnipotent. In other words, if God was powerful; He could have created the best possible

Show More
Related

Free Will In Slaughterhouse Five By Kurt Vonnegut

388 Words | 2 Pages

This passage from Slaughterhouse Five by Kurt Vonnegut, takes place on the planet of Tralfamadore, where the tralfamadorian is talking about the concept of free will, which is apparently, unique to earthlings. The passage goes on to further say that out of hundreds of planets, only on earth does the idea of free will exist. This passage argues that faith is futile, due to our lack of control of situations that occur around us. The tralfamadorian cannot understand the concept of free will. Free will, is the ability to make one’s own choices, however Slaughterhouse Five suggests throughout the novel, that free will, is not as free thinking as what was once thought.

Read More

How Does Cresco Influence Criminal Behavior

1222 Words | 5 Pages

Free will is an expression used to describe a person perfectly capable of making his or her own decisions without the influences of antecedent conditions (notes, free will). In other words, Cresco did not have to lead the young man into the alley way and he did not have to stab him repeatedly because it was in his complete control if he did or did not. He acted freely. Many people believe in free will because not to believe in free will questions the very essence of the human being—questions whether a person as a self even

Read More

Strawson's Basic Argument Analysis

493 Words | 2 Pages

Philosophers are on a constant struggle to determine if free-will is real or an illusion. Joshua Knobe believes we will do a better job addressing philosophical questions if we “can arrive at a better understanding of the way our own minds work” and free-will is a very important part of our brain, if it were to exist (Experiments in Philosophy, Pg.3). Some philosophers may argue that if free will is an illusion “you couldn’t come up with a philosophical stance on […] new information and act on it, because that implies choice and choice is a product of free will” (If scientists unequivocally proved free will was an illusion, how would society change, if at all?, Pg. 1). So to my wonder, would there be philosophical thinking without free will?

Read More

Mackie's Evil And Omnipotence

933 Words | 4 Pages

In Mackie’s Fallacious Situation, there are four main points that are discussed. One of the points is “Good must exist with evil”. Another is that “Evil is necessary as a means to good”. Another one is that “The universe is better with some evil in it that it could be if there were no evil”, and lastly is “Evil is due to human freewill”. These ideas try to explore the co-existence of evil and good in the same

Read More

Richard Swinburne Why God Allows Evil Analysis

436 Words | 2 Pages

In theory, he thinks that if God exists then evil should not, but it does. So he creates and argues a theodicy to show that God and evil can exist at the same time. He comes up with the “Free Will Theodicy” which states that humans are the cause of evil, not God. The Free Will Theodicy discusses two kinds of evil: moral evil and natural evil.

Read More

Socrates And Euthyphro's Argument Analysis

893 Words | 4 Pages

This is so because it becomes difficult to know whether moral goodness is independent of the will of God or if it is as a result of His will. The Euthyphro dilemma offers two intensely differing sides. On one side of the argument, theorists are of the opinion that morality is whatever God wills. This position then brings into question the goodness of God’s will if His command vindicates what is wrong. Arguing that goodness is the determined by God shows that what is rights is so because God wills it to be right.

Read More

JL Mackie's Argument For The Existence Of God?

295 Words | 2 Pages

JL Mackie was persuasive in his argument by showing that belief in an almighty God is not rational. He proves this by posing the problem of evil. According to JL Mackie, if God exists and is omniscient, omnipotent, and good then evil would not exist. However, evil exists in this world, sometimes in the form of undeserved suffering (diseases that affect humans, earthquakes, famines ...) and others perpetrated by man (murders, wars ...). If God exists and has the capability to be powerful, good, omniscient and omnipotent, why would he let evil be perpetrated?

Read More

Walter Sinnott-Armstrong's Argument Analysis

2349 Words | 10 Pages

The problem of evil takes into account three defining features of God: all-good, all-knowing, and all-powerful and questions whether such a God would permit evil and not interfere. Sinnott-Armstrong discusses his stance by countering responses he coins as the Glorious Response, the Modest Response, and the Overriding Response. Whereas, Craig counters the arguments made by Sinnott-Armstrong. The Glorious Response Thus response suggests evil is

Read More

Moral Evils: Swinburne's Solution To The Problem Of Evil

1006 Words | 5 Pages

There are two main ways in which natural evil operates to give humans those choices. First of all, natural evil provides chance for humans to learn how to bring the evil. For example, I can choose to ignore my sick friends instead of showing compassion towards the sufferer. If I get sick, I can either choose to spread it to others or subdue to disease and prevent it from spreading. Humans have the free will to choose to be good or evil.

Read More

Problem Of Evil Mackie Analysis

1089 Words | 5 Pages

This logical incompatibility between evil and God’s actuality can be made evident in two additional principles provided by Mackie. These are if something is omnipotent, it can do anything and if something is omnibenevolent it will eliminate as much evil as possible. Mackie claims God’s omnipotent characteristic is dependent on him being all powerful. If God is omnipotent than the subjection to limitations, such as the inevitability of evil, should not arise. This first premise is in relation to the second and third because if God is all powerful, wholly good and in existence, the product of his work, our world, should be a reflection of his being.

Read More

Rowe's Argument For The Existence Of God

1372 Words | 6 Pages

Mackie focuses on the broader logical inconsistency of proposition 1 to 3. This take on the argument shows a lot of loopholes in the argument which philosophers like Plantinga and Rowe can easily debunk. To do this all they needed to show were examples of certain circumstances where both God being omnipotent and benevolent can coexist with evil. It is evident that there exist sufferings and evils in the world which seem to not benefit anyone. Also, in this world there exist numerous people who claim that God exists in many forms, like through religious experiences and theistic proofs.

Read More

Cultural Differences Between Good And Evil

1242 Words | 5 Pages

Another Milestone that effects the way we define the notion of “Good and Evil” is largely based on our religion. Therefore, the way we see right from wrong, heaven and hell, light and darkness, Good vs. Evil and God and the Devil comes from the moral criterion that we attempt to apply to our worldviews. However, given the conspicuous contrasts amongst religions, ranging from Christianity to Islam to Judaism. Many people believe that due to the simple fact of religious diversity, this provides the basis to discredit any assumption of moral truths. Some religions define evil as “the result of human sin” or that “Evil is the result of a spiritual being who opposes the Lord God”

Read More

The Argument For The Problem Of Evil

929 Words | 4 Pages

A lot of arguments have been known to prove or disprove the existence of God, and the Problem of Evil is one of them. The Problem of Evil argues that it is impossible to have God and evil existing in the same world. Due to ideal characteristics of God, evil should not have a chance to exist and make human suffer. In this essay, I will examine the argument for the Problem of Evil, a possible theodicy against the argument, and reply to the theodicy. First of all, to be clear, the Problem of Evil is an argument that shows that God cannot be either all- powerful, all-knowing, and/or all good.

Read More

The Human Struggle: Good Vs. Evil

810 Words | 4 Pages

People of virtue go out of their way to put others first and think about how they can help others and the world around them. Conversely, evil is understood to be morally repugnant behavior or acts which intentionally cause harm to others. Someone who is bad only thinks about themselves and how they can use others to their own benefit. I think that good and evil is inherent in all of us, as humans, and has been within us since the beginning of our existence.

Read More

Definition Of Evil Essay

638 Words | 3 Pages

Evil is a simple word that we learn at a young age and that we understand is bad. However, our youth and innocence prevents us from knowing the weight the word holds. As our understanding of evil develops, we begin to see evil all around us. Although we hold common societal definitions of evil, each person is bound to view evil slightly different from others. Someone might consider alcoholism evil, while others consider it normal: someone might believe racism is evil, while others believe it is natural.

Read More

More about Moral Evil Vs Natural Evil

Related Topics

Open Document