The question who discovered America has been a debatable question amongst scholars of many areas or individuals in general. With regards to the initial discoverer, many theories began appearing throughout the years to answer such a question. Few of the scholars were anthropologist and sociologist Scott Fitzpatrick and Richard Callaghan an archeologist. As well as John Ruskcamp, an amateur epigraph researcher and retired chemist. Lastly, there is Iver Langmeon, who is Medical Doctor and known in the neurosurgery department in Norway. Anyhow, the three men portrayed many rhetorical aspects that were similar and dissimilar. A brief summary of what Ruskam’s article that dated back to 2014 was primarily about who discovered America along with Langemon and Fitzpartick. However, the theory that he suggested was that the Chinese had been in America about 2,500 years ago. Thus, the article just like Langeomon and Fitzpatrick’s article suggest that Cloumbus was not the first outsider to discover America, due to further research and evidence. Ruskcamp includes thirteen figures to his readers for a reference or guide of what he discovered on the rocks n New Mexico and Arizona. …show more content…
He discusses how the Polynesisans genetics in South American natives may indicate their presence before Columbus times. Furthermore, he focuses on using current research just like Ruskcamp to support the theory. The idea Polynesians might have encountered the south Americans by using their navigating skills gave scholars the idea to also include a simulation. This simulation was mentioned in Fitzpatrick’s article by using nine figures to represent their work and a good length of how the Polynesians genes transferred was made and