THEORIST 1: Thomas Hobbes, a 17th Century philosopher, argues that man is selfish and can justify the demeaning and condescending actions during the Crusader’s football game. Thomas Hobbes is well known for his political philosophy and his philosophy of man. His main concern is of social and political order, in which he contemplates how humans can coincide with one another in peace, and in avoidance of uncivil encounters. One of his works pertaining to the philosophy of man, “Of the Natural Condition of Mankind as Concerning Their Felicity, and Misery” in book, Leviathan. explains that man is inherently selfish. His argument is separated into three ideas. He believes man will compete to secure the basic necessities of life and to make other …show more content…
Sally Gearhart is a modern day theorist who is still alive, and is very passionate about feminism and political activistism. Gearhart explains that the feminism of rhetoric is trying to switch from a male perspective to a female perspective. In her opinion, rhetoric is not just language; it is any sort of action or thought towards another person. As Gearhart explains, “any intent to persuade is an act of violence” (241). She believes that this is the reason for all of the violence in the world today. Furthermore, the feministic and male rhetoric parallel the theory of “nature versus nurture” concept. The male version is the nature side, which is harsh and cruel. The feministic approach is the nurture side, which is respectful and caring. These apply to all situations in life where there is the opportunity to present a genuine and benevolent response, or a blunt and crude response. Gearhart states that communication should be viewed as a “woman-like process” (200). When followed, communication can thus turn into a calming act and create a peaceful environment. If the defensive player and his father approached the football game with a more feministic approach, the game could have commenced without any racial tensions. Therefore, presenting a new and better alternative to the situation. However, a feministic …show more content…
This shows the lack of effect mistreating blacks ultimately had on our country. Even though the pivotal landmark of blacks becoming American citizens occurred, discrimination is still evident in our world today. Numerous discriminating acts occurred throughout The Blind Side. The movie shows two opposite ends of the social class spectrum. The lesson the audience receives is that not all rich white Americans hold the belief they are better than others. Also, the audience receives the lesson that black Americans are not defined by their class in correlation to where they end up in life. This movie was shown from a side that glorified white Americans for being benevolent. However, it showed that they were humbled by their